From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/23] sched/fair: Compute task-class performance scores for load balancing
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:15:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzK/QisKmix6hrKG@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220909231205.14009-9-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 04:11:50PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> +static void compute_ilb_sg_task_class_scores(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *class_sgs,
> + struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
> + int dst_cpu)
> +{
> + int group_score, group_score_without, score_on_dst_cpu;
> + int busy_cpus = sgs->group_weight - sgs->idle_cpus;
> +
> + if (!sched_task_classes_enabled())
> + return;
> +
> + /* No busy CPUs in the group. No tasks to move. */
> + if (!busy_cpus)
> + return;
> +
> + score_on_dst_cpu = arch_get_task_class_score(class_sgs->p_min_score->class,
> + dst_cpu);
> +
> + /*
> + * The simpest case. The single busy CPU in the current group will
> + * become idle after pulling its current task. The destination CPU is
> + * idle.
> + */
> + if (busy_cpus == 1) {
> + sgs->task_class_score_before = class_sgs->sum_score;
> + sgs->task_class_score_after = score_on_dst_cpu;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Now compute the group score with and without the task with the
> + * lowest score. We assume that the tasks that remain in the group share
> + * the CPU resources equally.
> + */
> + group_score = class_sgs->sum_score / busy_cpus;
> +
> + group_score_without = (class_sgs->sum_score - class_sgs->min_score) /
> + (busy_cpus - 1);
> +
> + sgs->task_class_score_after = group_score_without + score_on_dst_cpu;
> + sgs->task_class_score_before = group_score;
> +}
That's just plain broken; also lots of cleanups done...
---
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8405,12 +8405,14 @@ struct sg_lb_stats {
enum group_type group_type;
unsigned int group_asym_packing; /* Tasks should be moved to preferred CPU */
unsigned long group_misfit_task_load; /* A CPU has a task too big for its capacity */
- long task_class_score_after; /* Prospective task-class score after load balancing */
- long task_class_score_before; /* Task-class score before load balancing */
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
unsigned int nr_numa_running;
unsigned int nr_preferred_running;
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_TASK_CLASSES
+ long task_class_score_after; /* Prospective task-class score after load balancing */
+ long task_class_score_before; /* Task-class score before load balancing */
+#endif
};
/*
@@ -8689,58 +8691,54 @@ group_type group_classify(unsigned int i
}
struct sg_lb_task_class_stats {
- /*
- * Score of the task with lowest score among the current tasks (i.e.,
- * runqueue::curr) of all runqueues in the scheduling group.
- */
- int min_score;
- /*
- * Sum of the scores of the current tasks of all runqueues in the
- * scheduling group.
- */
- long sum_score;
- /* The task with score equal to @min_score */
- struct task_struct *p_min_score;
+ int min_score; /* Min(rq->curr->score) */
+ int min_class;
+ long sum_score; /* Sum(rq->curr->score) */
};
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_TASK_CLASSES
-static void init_rq_task_classes_stats(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *class_sgs)
+static void init_sg_lb_task_class_stats(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *sgcs)
{
- class_sgs->min_score = INT_MAX;
- class_sgs->sum_score = 0;
- class_sgs->p_min_score = NULL;
+ *sgcs = (struct sg_lb_task_class_stats){
+ .min_score = INT_MAX,
+ };
}
/** Called only if cpu_of(@rq) is not idle and has tasks running. */
-static void update_rq_task_classes_stats(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *class_sgs,
- struct rq *rq)
+static void update_sg_lb_task_class_stats(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *sgcs,
+ struct rq *rq)
{
- int score;
+ struct task_struct *curr;
+ int class, score;
if (!sched_task_classes_enabled())
return;
+ curr = rcu_dereference(rq->curr);
+ if (!curr || (curr->flags & PF_EXITING) || is_idle_task(curr))
+ return;
+
/*
* TODO: if nr_running > 1 we may want go through all the tasks behind
* rq->curr.
*/
- score = arch_get_task_class_score(rq->curr->class, cpu_of(rq));
-
- class_sgs->sum_score += score;
+ class = curr->class;
+ score = arch_get_task_class_score(class, cpu_of(rq));
- if (score >= class_sgs->min_score)
- return;
+ sgcs->sum_score += score;
- class_sgs->min_score = score;
- class_sgs->p_min_score = rq->curr;
+ if (score < sgcs->min_score) {
+ sgcs->min_score = score;
+ sgcs->min_class = class;
+ }
}
-static void compute_ilb_sg_task_class_scores(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *class_sgs,
- struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
- int dst_cpu)
+static void update_sg_lb_stats_scores(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *sgcs,
+ struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
+ int dst_cpu)
{
- int group_score, group_score_without, score_on_dst_cpu;
int busy_cpus = sgs->group_weight - sgs->idle_cpus;
+ long before, after;
if (!sched_task_classes_enabled())
return;
@@ -8749,32 +8747,18 @@ static void compute_ilb_sg_task_class_sc
if (!busy_cpus)
return;
- score_on_dst_cpu = arch_get_task_class_score(class_sgs->p_min_score->class,
- dst_cpu);
+ score_on_dst_cpu = arch_get_task_class_score(sgcs->min_class, dst_cpu);
- /*
- * The simpest case. The single busy CPU in the current group will
- * become idle after pulling its current task. The destination CPU is
- * idle.
- */
- if (busy_cpus == 1) {
- sgs->task_class_score_before = class_sgs->sum_score;
- sgs->task_class_score_after = score_on_dst_cpu;
- return;
- }
+ before = sgcs->sum_score
+ after = before - sgcs->min_score + score_on_dst_cpu;
- /*
- * Now compute the group score with and without the task with the
- * lowest score. We assume that the tasks that remain in the group share
- * the CPU resources equally.
- */
- group_score = class_sgs->sum_score / busy_cpus;
-
- group_score_without = (class_sgs->sum_score - class_sgs->min_score) /
- (busy_cpus - 1);
+ if (busy_cpus > 1) {
+ before /= busy_cpus;
+ after /= busy_cpus;
+ }
- sgs->task_class_score_after = group_score_without + score_on_dst_cpu;
- sgs->task_class_score_before = group_score;
+ sgs->task_class_score_before = before;
+ sgs->task_class_score_after = after;
}
/**
@@ -8832,18 +8816,19 @@ static bool sched_asym_class_pick(struct
}
#else /* CONFIG_SCHED_TASK_CLASSES */
-static void update_rq_task_classes_stats(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *class_sgs,
- struct rq *rq)
+
+static void init_sg_lb_task_class_stats(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *sgcs)
{
}
-static void init_rq_task_classes_stats(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *class_sgs)
+static void update_sg_lb_task_class_stats(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *sgcs,
+ struct rq *rq)
{
}
-static void compute_ilb_sg_task_class_scores(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *class_sgs,
- struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
- int dst_cpu)
+static void update_sg_lb_stats_scores(struct sg_lb_task_class_stats *sgcs,
+ struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
+ int dst_cpu)
{
}
@@ -8854,7 +8839,6 @@ static bool sched_asym_class_pick(struct
{
return false;
}
-
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_TASK_CLASSES */
/**
@@ -8979,11 +8963,11 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(st
struct sg_lb_stats *sgs,
int *sg_status)
{
- struct sg_lb_task_class_stats class_stats;
+ struct sg_lb_task_class_stats sgcs;
int i, nr_running, local_group;
memset(sgs, 0, sizeof(*sgs));
- init_rq_task_classes_stats(&class_stats);
+ init_sg_lb_task_class_stats(&sgcs);
local_group = group == sds->local;
@@ -9034,7 +9018,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(st
sgs->group_misfit_task_load = load;
}
- update_rq_task_classes_stats(&class_stats, rq);
+ update_sg_lb_task_class_stats(&sgcs, rq);
}
sgs->group_capacity = group->sgc->capacity;
@@ -9045,7 +9029,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(st
if (!local_group && env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING &&
env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE && sgs->sum_h_nr_running &&
sched_asym(env, sds, sgs, group)) {
- compute_ilb_sg_task_class_scores(&class_stats, sgs, env->dst_cpu);
+ update_sg_lb_stats_scores(&sgcs, sgs, env->dst_cpu);
sgs->group_asym_packing = 1;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-27 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-09 23:11 [RFC PATCH 00/23] sched: Introduce classes of tasks for load balance Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 01/23] sched/task_struct: Introduce classes of tasks Ricardo Neri
2022-09-14 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-16 14:41 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 13:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-02 22:32 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 02/23] sched: Add interfaces for " Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 03/23] sched/core: Initialize the class of a new task Ricardo Neri
2022-09-26 14:57 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-09-26 21:53 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-27 15:48 ` Joel Fernandes
2022-10-01 20:32 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 04/23] sched/core: Add user_tick as argument to scheduler_tick() Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 05/23] sched/core: Move is_core_idle() out of fair.c Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 06/23] sched/core: Update the classification of the current task Ricardo Neri
2022-09-14 13:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-16 14:42 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 07/23] sched/fair: Collect load-balancing stats for task classes Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 08/23] sched/fair: Compute task-class performance scores for load balancing Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 9:15 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-10-26 3:57 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-26 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-27 3:30 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 09/23] sched/fair: Use task-class performance score to pick the busiest group Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-05 23:38 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-06 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 19:07 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 10/23] sched/fair: Use classes of tasks when selecting a busiest runqueue Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-07 23:36 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 11/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Introduce Hardware Feedback Interface classes Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 12/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Convert table_lock to use flags-handling variants Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-27 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-26 3:59 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-26 3:58 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 13/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add the Intel Thread Director feature definitions Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 14/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Update the class of the current task Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-07 20:34 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 15/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Report per-cpu class-specific performance scores Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-05 23:59 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-06 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 15:05 ` Brown, Len
2022-10-06 16:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-07 11:20 ` Len Brown
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 16/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Define a default classification for unclassified tasks Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 17/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Enable the Intel Thread Director Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 12:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 1:50 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 18/23] sched/task_struct: Add helpers for task classification Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-08 0:38 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 19/23] sched/core: Initialize helpers of " Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 20/23] thermal: intel: hfi: Implement model-specific checks for " Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 21/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add feature bit for HRESET Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 22/23] x86/hreset: Configure history reset Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-02 22:34 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-09 23:12 ` [RFC PATCH 23/23] x86/process: Reset hardware history in context switch Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-03 23:07 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-06 8:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-06 22:55 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 12:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-02 22:02 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-09-27 13:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-02 22:12 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-02 22:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-03 19:49 ` Ricardo Neri
2022-10-03 19:55 ` Borislav Petkov
[not found] ` <20220910072120.2651-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2022-09-16 14:51 ` [RFC PATCH 06/23] sched/core: Update the classification of the current task Ricardo Neri
2022-10-11 19:12 ` Trying to apply patch set Carlos Bilbao
2022-10-18 2:31 ` Ricardo Neri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YzK/QisKmix6hrKG@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).