linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.2-rc1
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 22:27:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230104212729.s6mdthwqdoxzbjga@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230104205640.o2uy2jk4v6yfm4w3@pali>

On Wednesday 04 January 2023 21:56:40 Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 January 2023 11:25:41 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 11:01 AM Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Driver is still used and userspace tools for it are part of the udftools
> > > project, which is still under active maintenance. More people already
> > > informed me about this "surprise".
> > 
> > Why is that driver used?
> > 
> > It's *literally* pointless. It's just a shell that forwards ioctl's to
> > the real drivers.
> > 
> > > Any comments on this? Because until now nobody answered why this
> > > actively used driver was removed from kernel without informing anybody:
> > 
> > Well, it's been marked as deprecated for five years, so any kernel
> > config should have gotten this notice for the help entry
> > 
> >           Note: This driver is deprecated and will be removed from the
> >           kernel in the near future!
> > 
> > but I guess people didn't notice.
> > 
> > It could be re-instated, but it really is a completely useless driver.
> > Just use the *regular* device nodes, not the pointless pktcd ones.
> > 
> > Is there any real reason why udftools can't just use the normal device node?
> > 
> > The historical reason for this driver being pointless goes back *much*
> > longer than five years - it used to be that the pktcd driver was
> > special, and was the only thing that did raw commands.
> > 
> > But the regular block layer was taught to do that back around 2004, so
> > the "pktcd" driver has literally just been a pointless shell for
> > almost two decades.
> > 
> > And I know it was in 2004, because I actually did most of that "make
> > SCSI commands generic" work myself (but had to go back to the old BK
> > archives to find the exact date - it's been two decades, after all).
> > 
> > I did it because I was fed up with the crazy pktcd driver requiring
> > extra work, when I just wanted to write CD's on my regular IDE CD-ROM
> > the obvious way.
> > 
> > So if there is some reason to actually use the pktcd driver, please
> > tell us what that is.
> > 
> >               Linus
> 
> Last time I did big retest of optical media was two years ago. At that
> time kernel was not able to mount CD-RW disc in full read-write mode
> from the normal node /dev/cdrom. Via pktcdvd driver mapping it was
> possible without any issue. Was there any change in last 5 (or more)
> years in this CD-RW area? Mounting CD-RW media in read-only mode via
> normal /dev/cdrom node always worked fine. Also "burning" CD-R media
> with userspace burning tools on normal /dev/cdrom node also worked.
> But here it is CD-RW media in read-write mode with kernel udf filesystem
> driver without any userspace involved (after proper formatting).

In commit where was pktcdvd dropped is written:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/f40eb99897af665f11858dd7b56edcb62c3f3c67

  * At the lowest level, there is the standard driver for the CD/DVD device,
  * such as drivers/scsi/sr.c. This driver can handle read and write requests,
  * but it doesn't know anything about the special restrictions that apply to
  * packet writing. One restriction is that write requests must be aligned to
  * packet boundaries on the physical media, and the size of a write request
  * must be equal to the packet size. Another restriction is that a
  * GPCMD_FLUSH_CACHE command has to be issued to the drive before a read
  * command, if the previous command was a write.
  *
  * The purpose of the packet writing driver is to hide these restrictions from
  * higher layers, such as file systems, and present a block device that can be
  * randomly read and written using 2kB-sized blocks.

Were all these write restrictions implemented in sr.c driver? Do you
remember other details?

Because CD-RW support into kernel was really introduced in 2004 in
this historical commit, but it was not for SCSI sr.c driver:
https://git.kernel.org/history/history/c/2f8e2dc86c9876edca632e8ef2ab1f68d1b753f0

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-04 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-25 22:07 Linux 6.2-rc1 Linus Torvalds
2022-12-26 19:52 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-26 20:56   ` Linus Torvalds
2022-12-26 21:03     ` Kees Cook
2022-12-26 22:10       ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-27  0:29       ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-27  1:32         ` Kees Cook
2022-12-27  5:52           ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-28  3:40             ` Kees Cook
2022-12-28 14:44               ` Guenter Roeck
2023-01-07  0:06                 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-12-26 22:41     ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-12-26 21:10   ` Max Filippov
2022-12-26 22:08     ` Guenter Roeck
2022-12-27  8:29 ` Build regressions/improvements in v6.2-rc1 Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-12-27  8:35   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-01  1:33     ` Rob Landley
2023-01-01 12:24       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-04  6:32         ` Michael Ellerman
2023-01-06 15:10     ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-06 15:17       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-06 15:18         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-17 16:42         ` Calculating array sizes in C - was: " John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-17 17:01           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-17 17:06             ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-17 20:05               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-01-17 20:37                 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-19 22:11                   ` Michael.Karcher
2023-01-20  3:31                     ` Rob Landley
2023-01-20 10:53                       ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-01-20 18:29                         ` Michael.Karcher
2023-01-20  8:49                     ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-20 19:29                       ` Michael Karcher
2023-01-21 21:26                         ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-06 15:39     ` Alex Deucher
2023-01-04 19:01 ` Linux 6.2-rc1 Pali Rohár
2023-01-04 19:25   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-04 20:56     ` Pali Rohár
2023-01-04 21:27       ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2023-01-04 21:32       ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-04 21:43         ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-05 11:25           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-01-05 15:26             ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-05 17:42           ` Pali Rohár
2023-01-05 17:45             ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-05 19:06               ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-05 19:22                 ` Pali Rohár
2023-01-05 19:40                 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-05 20:03                   ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-05 20:33                     ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-06 16:58                       ` Pali Rohár
2023-01-06 17:04                         ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-28 19:34                           ` pktcdvd Pali Rohár
2023-01-28 19:43                             ` pktcdvd Linus Torvalds
2023-01-29 21:53                               ` pktcdvd Jens Axboe
2023-01-29 21:55                             ` pktcdvd Jens Axboe
2023-01-29 22:21                               ` pktcdvd Pali Rohár
2023-01-29 22:34                                 ` pktcdvd Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230104212729.s6mdthwqdoxzbjga@pali \
    --to=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).