linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Trace Devel <linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@broadcom.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventfs: Have inodes have unique inode numbers
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2024 21:32:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240128213249.605a7ade@rorschach.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjKagcAh5rHuNPMqp9hH18APjF4jW7LQ06pNQwZ1Qp0Eg@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 17:42:30 -0800
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 at 17:00, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> >    mkdir dummy
> >    cd dummy
> >    echo "Hello" > hello
> >    ( sleep 10; cat ) < hello &
> >    rm hello
> >    cd ..
> >    rmdir dummy  
> 
> Note that it's worth repeating that simple_recursive_removal()
> wouldn't change any of the above. It only unhashes things and makes
> them *look* gone, doing things like clearing i_nlink etc.

I know, but I already cover the above case. And that case is not what
simple_recursive_removal() is covering.

I'm worried about what can be opened after a deletion. Not what has
already been opened. The simple_recrusive_removal() is the way to clear
the dcache on those files and directories that are being removed so
that no new references can happen on them.

So, I removed the simple_recursive_removal() from the code to see what
happened. Interesting, the opposite occurred.

 # cd /sys/kernel/tracing
 # echo 'p:sched schedule' > kprobe_events
 # ls events/kprobes
enable  filter  sched
 # ls events/kprobes/sched
enable  filter  format  hist  hist_debug  id  inject  trigger
 # cat events/kprobes/sched/enable
0

 # echo 'p:timer read_current_timer' >> kprobe_events
 # ls events/kprobes
enable  filter  sched  timer

Now delete just one kprobe (keeping the kprobes directory around)

 # echo '-:sched schedule' >> kprobe_events
 # ls events/kprobes/
enable  filter  timer

Now recreate that kprobe

 # echo 'p:sched schedule' >> kprobe_events
 # ls events/kprobes
enable  filter  sched  timer

 # ls events/kprobes/sched/
ls: reading directory 'events/kprobes/sched/': Invalid argument

I have no access to the directory that was deleted and recreated.

> 
> But those VFS data structures would still exist, and the files that
> had them open would still continue to be open.
> 
> So if you thought that simple_recursive_removal() would make the above
> kind of thing not able to happen, and that eventfs wouldn't have to
> deal with dentries that point to event_inodes that are dead, you were
> always wrong.

No but I want to shrink the dentries after the directory is removed.

Perhaps something else is the error here.

> 
> simple_recursive_removal() is mostly just lipstick on a pig. It does
> cause the cached dentries that have no active use be removed earlier,
> so it has that "memory pressure" kind of effect, but it has no real
> fundamental semantic effect.

I was using it to "flush" the cache on that directory. Nothing more.

> 
> Of course, for a filesystem where the dentry tree *is* the underlying
> data (ie the 'tmpfs' kind, but also things like debugfs or ipathfs,
> for example), then things are different.

Note, tracefs was built on debugfs. Only the "events" directory is
"different". The rest of /sys/kernel/tracing behaves exactly like
debugfs.

> 
> There the dentries are the primary thing, and not just a cache in
> front of the backing store.
> 
> But you didn't want that, and those days are long gone as far as
> tracefs is concerned.

Well, as long as eventfs is ;-)

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-29  2:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-26 20:02 [PATCH] eventfs: Have inodes have unique inode numbers Steven Rostedt
2024-01-26 20:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-26 21:26   ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-26 21:31     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-26 21:43       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-26 21:36     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-26 21:42       ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-26 21:49       ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-26 22:08         ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-26 22:26           ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-27 14:47             ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-28 14:42               ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-26 22:14         ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-26 22:29           ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-26 22:41             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-26 22:49               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-29 16:00                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-29 18:58                   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-26 22:34           ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-26 22:40             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-01-26 22:48             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-26 23:04               ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-01-26 23:11                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-26 23:17                   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-27  9:36                     ` Andreas Schwab
2024-01-27 21:47         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-28 20:15           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-28 20:53             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-28 21:08               ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-28 22:01                 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-28 22:17                   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-28 22:26                     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-28 21:11               ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-28 21:19               ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-28 21:43                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-28 22:07                   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-28 22:17                     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-28 22:25                       ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-28 22:51           ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-28 23:24             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-28 23:59               ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-29  0:21                 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-29  1:00                   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-29  1:42                     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-29  2:32                       ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2024-01-29  3:40                         ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-29  4:01                           ` Linus Torvalds
2024-01-29  2:09                     ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-29  6:44                       ` Amir Goldstein
2024-01-29  9:32                         ` Steven Rostedt
2024-01-27 15:26       ` David Laight
2024-01-27 20:01         ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240128213249.605a7ade@rorschach.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=ajay.kaher@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).