linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] fs/writeback: avoid to writeback non-expired inode in kupdate writeback
Date: Fri,  9 Feb 2024 01:20:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240208172024.23625-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240208172024.23625-1-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>

In kupdate writeback, only expired inode (have been dirty for longer than
dirty_expire_interval) is supposed to be written back. However, kupdate
writeback will writeback non-expired inode left in b_io or b_more_io from
last wb_writeback. As a result, writeback will keep being triggered
unexpected when we keep dirtying pages even dirty memory is under
threshold and inode is not expired. To be more specific:
Assume dirty background threshold is > 1G and dirty_expire_centisecs is
> 60s. When we running fio -size=1G -invalidate=0 -ioengine=libaio
--time_based -runtime=60... (keep dirtying), the writeback will keep
being triggered as following:
wb_workfn
  wb_do_writeback
    wb_check_background_flush
      /*
       * Wb dirty background threshold starts at 0 if device was idle and
       * grows up when bandwidth of wb is updated. So a background
       * writeback is triggered.
       */
      wb_over_bg_thresh
      /*
       * Dirtied inode will be written back and added to b_more_io list
       * after slice used up (because we keep dirtying the inode).
       */
      wb_writeback

Writeback is triggered per dirty_writeback_centisecs as following:
wb_workfn
  wb_do_writeback
    wb_check_old_data_flush
      /*
       * Write back inode left in b_io and b_more_io from last wb_writeback
       * even the inode is non-expired and it will be added to b_more_io
       * again as slice will be used up (because we keep dirtying the
       * inode)
       */
      wb_writeback

Fix this by moving non-expired inode in io list from last wb_writeback to
dirty list in kudpate writeback.

Test as following:
/* make it more easier to observe the issue */
echo 300000 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_expire_centisecs
echo 100 > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_writeback_centisecs
/* create a idle device */
mkfs.ext4 -F /dev/vdb
mount /dev/vdb /bdi1/
/* run buffer write with fio */
fio -name test -filename=/bdi1/file -size=800M -ioengine=libaio -bs=4K \
-iodepth=1 -rw=write -direct=0 --time_based -runtime=60 -invalidate=0

Result before fix (run three tests):
1360MB/s
1329MB/s
1455MB/s

Result after fix (run three tests);
790MB/s
1820MB/s
1804MB/s

Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
---
 fs/fs-writeback.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 5ab1aaf805f7..a9a918972719 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -2046,6 +2046,23 @@ static long writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writeback *wb, long nr_pages,
 	return nr_pages - work.nr_pages;
 }
 
+static void filter_expired_io(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
+{
+	struct inode *inode, *tmp;
+	unsigned long expired_jiffies = jiffies -
+		msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_expire_interval * 10);
+
+	spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, tmp, &wb->b_io, i_io_list)
+		if (inode_dirtied_after(inode, expired_jiffies))
+			redirty_tail(inode, wb);
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, tmp, &wb->b_more_io, i_io_list)
+		if (inode_dirtied_after(inode, expired_jiffies))
+			redirty_tail(inode, wb);
+	spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
+}
+
 /*
  * Explicit flushing or periodic writeback of "old" data.
  *
@@ -2070,6 +2087,9 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
 	long progress;
 	struct blk_plug plug;
 
+	if (work->for_kupdate)
+		filter_expired_io(wb);
+
 	blk_start_plug(&plug);
 	for (;;) {
 		/*
-- 
2.30.0


  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-08  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-08 17:20 [PATCH 0/7] Fixes and cleanups to fs-writeback Kemeng Shi
2024-02-08 17:20 ` Kemeng Shi [this message]
2024-02-08 18:29   ` [PATCH 1/7] fs/writeback: avoid to writeback non-expired inode in kupdate writeback Tim Chen
2024-02-18  2:01     ` Kemeng Shi
2024-02-28  1:46       ` Kemeng Shi
2024-02-23 13:42   ` Jan Kara
2024-02-26 11:47     ` Kemeng Shi
2024-02-08 17:20 ` [PATCH 2/7] fs/writeback: bail out if there is no more inodes for IO and queued once Kemeng Shi
2024-02-08 19:21   ` Tim Chen
2024-02-18  2:11     ` Kemeng Shi
2024-02-23 13:49   ` Jan Kara
2024-02-08 17:20 ` [PATCH 3/7] fs/writeback: remove unused parameter wb of finish_writeback_work Kemeng Shi
2024-02-08 19:26   ` Tim Chen
2024-02-23 13:49   ` Jan Kara
2024-02-08 17:20 ` [PATCH 4/7] fs/writeback: remove unneeded check in writeback_single_inode Kemeng Shi
2024-02-08 19:34   ` Tim Chen
2024-02-10  0:46   ` Dave Chinner
2024-02-18  2:37     ` Kemeng Shi
2024-02-08 17:20 ` [PATCH 5/7] fs/writeback: only calculate dirtied_before when b_io is empty Kemeng Shi
2024-02-23 13:58   ` Jan Kara
2024-02-26 11:50     ` Kemeng Shi
2024-02-08 17:20 ` [PATCH 6/7] fs/writeback: correct comment of __wakeup_flusher_threads_bdi Kemeng Shi
2024-02-23 13:59   ` Jan Kara
2024-02-08 17:20 ` [PATCH 7/7] fs/writeback: remove unnecessary return in writeback_inodes_sb Kemeng Shi
2024-02-23 13:59   ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240208172024.23625-2-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=shikemeng@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).