From: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
To: <jamesclv@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "Gerrit Huizenga" <gh@us.ibm.com>, <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
<pbadari@us.ibm.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<johnstul@us.ibm.com>, <mannthey@us.ibm.com>,
"Andrew Theurer" <habanero@us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: userspace irq balancer
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 18:10:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3014AAAC8E0930438FD38EBF6DCEB56402043360@fmsmsx407.fm.intel.com> (raw)
> So, I suppose an argument could be made for setting the TPR to the vector
> number on entry of do_IRQ. I don't think that would be a good idea.
I agree. If we start spl-like ranking of interrupts, we need to modify disable/enable_irq(), etc. as well, causing possible impacts to device derivers.
One thing that might be helpful here is to have 4-level of priorities, for example:
Idle (0)
User (0x10)
Kernel (0x20)
Interrupt (0x30)
Jun
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Cleverdon [mailto:jamesclv@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2003 8:30 AM
> To: William Lee Irwin III
> Cc: Gerrit Huizenga; Nakajima, Jun; haveblue@us.ibm.com;
> pbadari@us.ibm.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; johnstul@us.ibm.com;
> mannthey@us.ibm.com; Andrew Theurer
> Subject: Re: userspace irq balancer
>
> On Thursday 22 May 2003 07:43 am, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 07:18:06AM -0700, James Cleverdon wrote:
> > > Here's my old very stupid TPR patch . It lacks TPRing soft ints for
> > > kernel preemption, etc. Because the xTPR logic only compares the top
> > > nibble of the TPR and I don't want to mask out IRQs unnecessarily, it
> > > only tracks busy/idle and IRQ/no-IRQ.
> > > Simple enough for you, Bill? 8^)
> >
> > Simple enough, yes. But I hesitate to endorse it without making sure
> > it's not too simple.
> >
> > It's much closer to the right direction, which is actually following
> > hardware docs and then punting the fancy (potentially more performant)
> > bits up into userspace. When properly tuned, it should actually have a
> > useful interaction with explicit irq balancing via retargeting IO-APIC
> > RTE destinations as interrupts targeted at a destination specifying
> > multiple cpus won't always target a single cpu when TPR's are adjusted.
> >
> > The only real issue with the TPR is that it's an spl-like ranking of
> > interrupts, assuming a static prioritization based on vector number.
> > That doesn't really agree with the Linux model and is undesirable in
> > various scenarios; however, it's how the hardware works and so can't
> > be avoided (and the disastrous attempt to avoid it didn't DTRT anyway).
> >
> >
> > -- wli
>
> Serial APICs have always had a spl-like effect built into them. The
> effective
> TPR value of a given local APIC is:
> max(TPR, highest vector currently in progress) & 0xF0
> Parallel APICs don't do that because they don't have serial priority
> arbitration; instead they use the xTPRs in the bridge chips.
>
> So, I suppose an argument could be made for setting the TPR to the vector
> number on entry of do_IRQ. I don't think that would be a good idea. It
> could interfere with IRQ nesting during a non-DMA IDE interrupt handler.
> And
> of course, an IRQ's vector has little to do with the IRQ itself, thanks to
> the vector hashing scheme used to avoid the (stupid) 2 latches per APIC
> level
> HW limitation of most i586 and i686 CPUs.
>
>
> --
> James Cleverdon
> IBM xSeries Linux Solutions
> {jamesclv(Unix, preferred), cleverdj(Notes)} at us dot ibm dot com
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-24 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-24 1:10 Nakajima, Jun [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-21 21:43 userspace irq balancer Nakajima, Jun
2003-05-22 0:29 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2003-05-22 1:28 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-22 1:44 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2003-05-22 2:03 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-22 2:04 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-22 2:12 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-22 3:57 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-22 17:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-05-22 22:44 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-26 22:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-26 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-26 23:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-26 23:43 ` David S. Miller
[not found] ` <20030527000639.GA3767@dualathlon.random>
2003-05-27 0:15 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-27 0:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-27 0:48 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-27 1:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-27 1:13 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-27 1:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-27 6:11 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-27 11:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-27 22:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-27 22:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-27 23:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-13 6:22 ` David S. Miller
2003-06-13 18:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-27 1:16 ` Dave Jones
2003-05-27 1:17 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-27 9:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-05-27 9:10 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-27 1:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-27 1:53 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-27 1:59 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-27 2:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-27 2:15 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-27 2:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-27 2:45 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-05-27 4:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-27 2:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-27 2:14 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-27 2:26 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-27 1:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-27 1:20 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-27 1:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-05-22 14:18 ` James Cleverdon
2003-05-22 14:43 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-22 15:30 ` James Cleverdon
2003-05-22 15:45 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-21 16:31 James Bottomley
2003-05-21 20:16 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-05-20 15:41 Nakajima, Jun
2003-05-21 13:54 ` James Cleverdon
2003-05-21 22:56 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
[not found] <200305191314.06216.pbadari@us.ibm.com>
2003-05-19 22:07 ` Dave Hansen
2003-05-19 22:11 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-05-19 22:22 ` Dave Hansen
2003-05-20 3:25 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-20 3:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-20 5:03 ` Dave Hansen
2003-05-20 5:53 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-20 6:13 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-20 6:36 ` Dave Hansen
2003-05-20 6:40 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-20 14:07 ` Andrew Theurer
2003-05-20 14:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-05-20 14:35 ` Andrew Theurer
[not found] ` <20030520.163833.104040023.davem@redhat.com>
2003-05-21 14:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-21 22:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-21 11:00 ` Kai Bankett
2003-05-20 14:01 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-20 9:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-05-20 9:14 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-05-20 9:17 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20030520.172230.102567463.davem@redhat.com>
2003-05-21 14:27 ` James Cleverdon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3014AAAC8E0930438FD38EBF6DCEB56402043360@fmsmsx407.fm.intel.com \
--to=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=gh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=habanero@us.ibm.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jamesclv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mannthey@us.ibm.com \
--cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).