[PATCH 1/3] spi/rockchip: add rk3036/rk3228/rk3368 socs for spi document

[PATCH 1/3] spi/rockchip: add rk3036/rk3228/rk3368 socs for spi document

[Caesar Wang]

We had supported the rk3036/rk3066/rk3188/rk3228/rk3288/rk3368/rk3399
family SoCs in linux kernel.

Let's add the other SoCs, in order to a better understanding from the
rockchip spi document.

Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
---

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt
index 1b14d69..305b542 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt
@@ -6,9 +6,12 @@ and display controllers using the SPI communication interface.
 Required Properties:
 
 - compatible: should be one of the following.
+    "rockchip,rk3036-spi" for rk3036.
     "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3066.
     "rockchip,rk3188-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3188.
+    "rockchip,rk3228-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3228.
     "rockchip,rk3288-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3288.
+    "rockchip,rk3368-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3368.
     "rockchip,rk3399-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3399.
 - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory mapped
        region.
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 2/3] spi/rockchip: add the rk3036/rk3228/rk3368 to match for driver

[Caesar Wang]

In gerenal, the "rockchip,rockchip-spi" string will match the dts
that's great in spi driver. After all the most of rockchip SoCs ar
same spi controller.

Then, we should keep the old style to match the dts various.

Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
---

 drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
index 6c6c001..dd08b68 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
@@ -893,9 +893,12 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops rockchip_spi_pm = {
 };
 
 static const struct of_device_id rockchip_spi_dt_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3036-spi", },
 	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066-spi", },
 	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3188-spi", },
+	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3228-spi", },
 	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-spi", },
+	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3368-spi", },
 	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-spi", },
 	{ },
 };
-- 
2.7.4

Applied "spi/rockchip: add the rk3036/rk3228/rk3368 to match for driver" to the spi tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   spi/rockchip: add the rk3036/rk3228/rk3368 to match for driver

has been applied to the spi tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From aa29ea3df27dbba19ef59023d0f7330f2fdc58ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 07:56:21 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] spi/rockchip: add the rk3036/rk3228/rk3368 to match for
 driver

In gerenal, the "rockchip,rockchip-spi" string will match the dts
that's great in spi driver. After all the most of rockchip SoCs ar
same spi controller.

Then, we should keep the old style to match the dts various.

Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
index cd89682065b9..bead5bfcbb0c 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-rockchip.c
@@ -892,9 +892,12 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops rockchip_spi_pm = {
 };
 
 static const struct of_device_id rockchip_spi_dt_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3036-spi", },
 	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3066-spi", },
 	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3188-spi", },
+	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3228-spi", },
 	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3288-spi", },
+	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3368-spi", },
 	{ .compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-spi", },
 	{ },
 };
-- 
2.8.1

[PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: rockchip: fixes the spi compatible for rk3036

[Caesar Wang]

That's seem the incorrect string to match the spi driver.

Fixes commit f629fcfab2cd
("ARM: dts: rockchip: support the spi for rk3036")

Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org

---

 arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036.dtsi
index d0f4bb7..a30700a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk3036.dtsi
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@
 	};
 
 	spi: spi@20074000 {
-		compatible = "rockchip,rockchip-spi";
+		compatible = "rockchip,rk3036-spi";
 		reg = <0x20074000 0x1000>;
 		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 23 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
 		clocks =<&cru PCLK_SPI>, <&cru SCLK_SPI>;
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi/rockchip: add rk3036/rk3228/rk3368 socs for spi document

[Heiko Stuebner]

Am Donnerstag, 19. Mai 2016, 23:47:02 schrieb Caesar Wang:
> We had supported the rk3036/rk3066/rk3188/rk3228/rk3288/rk3368/rk3399
> family SoCs in linux kernel.
> 
> Let's add the other SoCs, in order to a better understanding from the
> rockchip spi document.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> ---
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt index
> 1b14d69..305b542 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt
> @@ -6,9 +6,12 @@ and display controllers using the SPI communication
> interface. Required Properties:
> 
>  - compatible: should be one of the following.
> +    "rockchip,rk3036-spi" for rk3036.

shouldn't the rk3036 also get the rk3066 fallback. Looking at the driver 
part (patch2) the rk3036 still is the same IP as for every other soc in 
here.

>      "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3066.
>      "rockchip,rk3188-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3188.
> +    "rockchip,rk3228-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3228.
>      "rockchip,rk3288-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3288.
> +    "rockchip,rk3368-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3368.
>      "rockchip,rk3399-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3399.
>  - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory
> mapped region.

Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi/rockchip: add rk3036/rk3228/rk3368 socs for spi document

[Caesar Wang]

在 2016年05月19日 23:51, Heiko Stuebner 写道:
> Am Donnerstag, 19. Mai 2016, 23:47:02 schrieb Caesar Wang:
>> We had supported the rk3036/rk3066/rk3188/rk3228/rk3288/rk3368/rk3399
>> family SoCs in linux kernel.
>>
>> Let's add the other SoCs, in order to a better understanding from the
>> rockchip spi document.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>> Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
>> ---
>>
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt index
>> 1b14d69..305b542 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt
>> @@ -6,9 +6,12 @@ and display controllers using the SPI communication
>> interface. Required Properties:
>>
>>   - compatible: should be one of the following.
>> +    "rockchip,rk3036-spi" for rk3036.
> shouldn't the rk3036 also get the rk3066 fallback. Looking at the driver
> part (patch2) the rk3036 still is the same IP as for every other soc in
> here.

Yep, the same IP.

Do you think we should keep the below style?

1)
"rockchip,rk3036-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3036.
  "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3066.
  "rockchip,rk3188-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3188.
...

or
2)
  "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3066.
"rockchip,rk3036-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3036.
  "rockchip,rk3188-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3188
..

or
3)
"rockchip, rockchip-spi" for rk3036 rk3066.......

Think about the 1) will be googd select.

-Caesar

>>       "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3066.
>>       "rockchip,rk3188-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3188.
>> +    "rockchip,rk3228-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3228.
>>       "rockchip,rk3288-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3288.
>> +    "rockchip,rk3368-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3368.
>>       "rockchip,rk3399-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3399.
>>   - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory
>> mapped region.
>
>
>

Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi/rockchip: add rk3036/rk3228/rk3368 socs for spi document

[Heiko Stuebner]

Am Freitag, 20. Mai 2016, 00:04:07 schrieb Caesar Wang:
> 在 2016年05月19日 23:51, Heiko Stuebner 写道:
> > Am Donnerstag, 19. Mai 2016, 23:47:02 schrieb Caesar Wang:
> >> We had supported the rk3036/rk3066/rk3188/rk3228/rk3288/rk3368/rk3399
> >> family SoCs in linux kernel.
> >> 
> >> Let's add the other SoCs, in order to a better understanding from the
> >> rockchip spi document.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
> >> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> >> Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> >> ---
> >> 
> >>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt | 3 +++
> >>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt
> >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt index
> >> 1b14d69..305b542 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-rockchip.txt
> >> @@ -6,9 +6,12 @@ and display controllers using the SPI communication
> >> 
> >> interface. Required Properties:
> >>   - compatible: should be one of the following.
> >> 
> >> +    "rockchip,rk3036-spi" for rk3036.
> > 
> > shouldn't the rk3036 also get the rk3066 fallback. Looking at the driver
> > part (patch2) the rk3036 still is the same IP as for every other soc in
> > here.
> 
> Yep, the same IP.
> 
> Do you think we should keep the below style?
> 
> 1)
> "rockchip,rk3036-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3036.
>   "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3066.
>   "rockchip,rk3188-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3188.
> ...
> 
> or
> 2)
>   "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3066.
> "rockchip,rk3036-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3036.
>   "rockchip,rk3188-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3188
> ..
> 
> or
> 3)
> "rockchip, rockchip-spi" for rk3036 rk3066.......
> 
> Think about the 1) will be googd select.

or
(4) drop the fallbacks. We match against each compatible all the time 
anyway, so you could also simply do

  "rockchip,rk3036-spi" for rk3036
  "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3066
  "rockchip,rk3188-spi" for rk3188

Maybe leave the fallbacks for existing socs, and just add the new ones 
without the fallbacks.

rockchip,rockchip-spi is not future proof ... i.e. in some future soc 
somebody might want to exchange the IP block against a different one, so 
being specific saves us from hassle then :-)


Heiko

> >>       "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3066.
> >>       "rockchip,rk3188-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3188.
> >> 
> >> +    "rockchip,rk3228-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3228.
> >> 
> >>       "rockchip,rk3288-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3288.
> >> 
> >> +    "rockchip,rk3368-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3368.
> >> 
> >>       "rockchip,rk3399-spi", "rockchip,rk3066-spi" for rk3399.
> >>   
> >>   - reg: physical base address of the controller and length of memory
> >> 
> >> mapped region.