linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Stephan Müller" <smueller@chronox.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v12 2/4] random: conditionally compile code depending on LRNG
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:50:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3877747.RUAmeEdMP1@tauon.chronox.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a1mFxSgttJU9vUkdb6nT6mYPSceFDcRRg9cFprZCjWn5A@mail.gmail.com>

Am Dienstag, 18. Juli 2017, 10:47:00 CEST schrieb Arnd Bergmann:

Hi Arnd,

> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Stephan Müller <smueller@chronox.de> 
wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 18. Juli 2017, 10:13:55 CEST schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> >> On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Stephan Müller <smueller@chronox.de> 
wrote:
> >> > When selecting the LRNG for compilation, disable add_disk_randomness
> >> > and
> >> > its supporting function.
> >> > 
> >> > CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >> > CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >> > CC: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
> >> 
> >> I think this needs a better explanation. Why do we ignore the extra
> >> entropy here?
> > 
> > I was not sure whether to add all the details about the reason into the
> > patch submission.
> > 
> > The reason is explained here in [1] page 3 and re-iterated in [2].
> 
> Ok, got it. A half-sentence summary of that ("... to avoid adding the
> same event twice from interrupt and block") would be sufficient for
> the patch description, longer is also fine.

Perfect, thank you for that hint. I will add this information to a next 
iteration.
> 
> Generally speaking, each patch description should describe why
> that particular patch is required rather than describe what it does
> (which in cases like this is plain to see from looking a few lines
> down).
> 
>         Arnd



Ciao
Stephan

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-18  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-18  7:57 [RFC PATCH v12 0/4] /dev/random - a new approach Stephan Müller
2017-07-18  7:57 ` [RFC PATCH v12 1/4] crypto: make Jitter RNG directly accessible Stephan Müller
2017-07-18  8:30   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-18  8:40     ` Stephan Müller
2017-07-18  8:49       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-18  8:53         ` Stephan Müller
2017-07-18  9:02         ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-07-18  9:10           ` Stephan Müller
2017-07-18  9:16             ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-07-18  9:17               ` Stephan Müller
2017-07-18  7:58 ` [RFC PATCH v12 2/4] random: conditionally compile code depending on LRNG Stephan Müller
2017-07-18  8:13   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-07-18  8:37     ` Stephan Müller
2017-07-18  8:47       ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-07-18  8:50         ` Stephan Müller [this message]
2017-07-18  7:59 ` [RFC PATCH v12 3/4] Linux Random Number Generator Stephan Müller
2017-07-18  8:32   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-18  8:45     ` Stephan Müller
2017-07-18  8:52       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-18 14:37         ` Stephan Müller
2017-07-18 21:08           ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-19  1:00             ` Sandy Harris
2017-07-19  1:51               ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-19  6:25                 ` Stephan Müller
2017-07-30 10:44                 ` Pavel Machek
2017-07-23 18:05               ` Sandy Harris
2017-07-23 21:47                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-19  6:22             ` Stephan Müller
2017-07-19  6:34               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-19 17:26               ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-20 19:00                 ` Stephan Müller
2017-07-21  3:08                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-21  8:57                     ` Stephan Müller
2017-07-21 15:09                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-07-21 15:17                         ` Stephan Müller
2017-07-18  8:52       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-07-18  7:59 ` [RFC PATCH v12 4/4] LRNG - enable compile Stephan Müller
2017-07-18  8:51   ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-07-18  8:56     ` Stephan Müller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3877747.RUAmeEdMP1@tauon.chronox.de \
    --to=smueller@chronox.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).