From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>, Joe Konno <joe.konno@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Benjamin Drung <benjamin.drung@profitbricks.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/2] efivars: reading variables can generate SMIs
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:32:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7B37917B@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180216192220.wljl23g533sc3oxg@redhat.com>
> tl;dr: I think changing everything to 0600 is probably completely fine,
> and whitelisting is probably pointless.
But do you speak for all users? It will just take one person complaining
that efibootmgr no longer shows them what it used to show to bring down
the wrath of Linus on our (specifically Joe's) head for breaking user space.
I've got someone about to start looking at making efivarfs read and save
the values during mount, so all the read-only options can continue to work
without making EFI calls.
This will cost some memory (say 20-30 variables at up to 1K each).
-Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-16 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-15 18:22 [PATCH 0/2] efivars: reading variables can generate SMIs Joe Konno
2018-02-15 18:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs/efivarfs: restrict inode permissions Joe Konno
2018-02-20 19:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-20 21:18 ` Luck, Tony
2018-02-20 21:22 ` Matthew Garrett
2018-02-20 21:32 ` Luck, Tony
2018-02-20 21:35 ` Matthew Garrett
2018-02-20 22:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-20 23:30 ` Luck, Tony
2018-02-20 23:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2018-02-20 23:50 ` Luck, Tony
2018-02-21 0:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-21 1:05 ` Luck, Tony
2018-02-21 2:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-21 9:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-21 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-21 18:21 ` Andi Kleen
2018-02-21 19:47 ` Luck, Tony
2018-02-21 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-21 19:58 ` Luck, Tony
2018-02-21 20:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-22 1:45 ` [PATCH] efivarfs: Limit the rate for non-root to read files Luck, Tony
2018-02-22 1:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-22 5:34 ` Luck, Tony
2018-02-22 17:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
[not found] ` <CA+55aFy0hRexJkLbN7t31LjfGr4Ae0W5g6sBMqHHJi8aYuGKeA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <612E894E-62C8-4155-AED8-D53702EDC8DC@intel.com>
[not found] ` <CA+55aFxeBaTbwvbWqx1MKYjKKzLUs=1O43Bx2=JaO8qrnY-8HA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-02-22 17:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Luck, Tony
2018-02-22 17:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-22 17:54 ` Luck, Tony
2018-02-22 18:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-22 18:08 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-23 20:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-23 19:47 ` [PATCH] " Peter Jones
2018-02-21 19:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] fs/efivarfs: restrict inode permissions Linus Torvalds
2018-02-24 20:06 ` Alan Cox
2018-02-25 10:56 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-21 0:49 ` Peter Jones
2018-02-20 23:19 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-15 18:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] efi: restrict top-level attribute permissions Joe Konno
2018-02-16 10:41 ` [PATCH 0/2] efivars: reading variables can generate SMIs Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-16 10:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-16 10:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-16 11:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-16 11:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-16 18:48 ` Joe Konno
2018-02-16 18:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-02-16 19:22 ` Peter Jones
2018-02-16 19:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-16 19:51 ` Matthew Garrett
2018-02-16 19:32 ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2018-02-16 19:54 ` Peter Jones
2018-02-16 20:51 ` James Bottomley
2018-02-16 21:09 ` Luck, Tony
2018-02-16 21:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-16 21:58 ` Matthew Garrett
2018-02-16 22:02 ` Luck, Tony
2018-02-16 22:03 ` Matthew Garrett
2018-02-17 18:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-16 22:05 ` Peter Jones
2018-02-17 9:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-02-17 16:17 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7B37917B@ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=benjamin.drung@profitbricks.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=jk@ozlabs.org \
--cc=joe.konno@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@google.com \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).