From: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
To: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
Cc: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Pointless Waffle] Re: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!]
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:00:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3EB0397A.2070108@techsource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200304302021.h3UKLYlf001981@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk
John Bradford wrote:
>>Was the whole DRM discussion off-topic?
>
>
> It was certainly ironic that the subject was 'Why DRM exists', when it
> clearly doesn't within the scope of the Linux kernel, and isn't on the
> horizon for the Linux kernel either, which is what this mailing list
> is intended for.
>
> John.
>
>
Doesn't the lkml FAQ say that posts which complain about other posts
being off-topic are themselves off-topic?
<ahem> :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-30 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-30 14:52 Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!] Downing, Thomas
2003-04-30 15:20 ` Larry McVoy
2003-04-30 15:55 ` Jeff Randall
2003-05-01 12:43 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-04-30 18:19 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-30 19:20 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-04-30 19:41 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-30 19:53 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-04-30 19:55 ` viro
2003-04-30 20:09 ` Timothy Miller
2003-04-30 20:21 ` [Pointless Waffle] " John Bradford
2003-04-30 21:00 ` Timothy Miller [this message]
2003-04-30 21:57 ` [Pointless Waffle] Re: Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to John Bradford
2003-04-30 18:58 ` Why DRM exists [was Re: Flame Linus to a crisp!] Edgar Toernig
2003-04-30 22:43 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-05-01 1:03 ` Larry McVoy
2003-05-01 12:27 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-05-01 13:11 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-05-01 17:40 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3EB0397A.2070108@techsource.com \
--to=miller@techsource.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).