linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: Megaraid does not work with 2.4.22
@ 2003-10-01 11:01 syn uw
  2003-10-01 13:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: syn uw @ 2003-10-01 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xose, linux-kernel, marcelo.tosatti, atulm, linux-megaraid-devel

>I don't know what is the opinion of other people :-?
>Maybe linux-scsi members hold other opinion.

Well I for example would be more than pleased to see megaraid 2.x included 
in the next stable 2.4.x Linux kernel !! I had a look at the current 
changelogs of 2.4.23 and still no traces about a megaraid v2 inclusion :(( 
Hopefully that will happen soon !

Regards

_________________________________________________________________
Get McAfee virus scanning and cleaning of incoming attachments.  Get Hotmail 
Extra Storage!   http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Megaraid does not work with 2.4.22
@ 2003-10-01 23:33 Tomita, Haruo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Tomita, Haruo @ 2003-10-01 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xose Vazquez Perez, Marcelo Tosatti
  Cc: syn uw, linux-kernel, marcelo.tosatti, atulm, linux-megaraid-devel

Xose Vazquez Perez [xose@wanadoo.es] wrote:

> megaraid 2.xx gets correct performance, it's stable and it 
> adds support
> for _present_ hardware, MegaRAID Ultra320 RAID boards(518, 
> 520, 531, 532).

Please remember what is also done for clean up of the source code.
it is very simple!!.
--
Haruo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: Megaraid does not work with 2.4.22
@ 2003-10-01 21:40 syn uw
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: syn uw @ 2003-10-01 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: marcelo.tosatti, xose
  Cc: linux-kernel, marcelo.tosatti, atulm, linux-megaraid-devel

>Fine. I agree on adding in to mainline 2.4.x.

Great, this is really good news for all of us here owning a LSI MegaRAID 
card ! Thank you very much!!

Now will this already go in kernel 2.4.23 ?

Regards

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Megaraid does not work with 2.4.22
@ 2003-10-01  0:11 Tomita, Haruo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Tomita, Haruo @ 2003-10-01  0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matt_Domsch, xose
  Cc: linux-kernel, marcelo.tosatti, atulm, linux-megaraid-devel

Hi Matt,

Matt wrote;

Matt> Atul should be submitting changelogs and patches to James 
Matt> Bottomley and linux-scsi for inclusion in both 2.4.x and 2.6.x,
Matt> unless Marcelo asks to receive them directly.

I think that it is better to also update the driver of 1.18x 
in the kernel tree of 2.4.x to the latest version(1.18k).
-- 
Haruo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Megaraid does not work with 2.4.22
@ 2003-09-30 19:34 Matt_Domsch
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Matt_Domsch @ 2003-09-30 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xose; +Cc: linux-kernel, marcelo.tosatti, atulm, linux-megaraid-devel

> What are your plans to integrate the 1.18k as well as 2.00.9 megaraid
> drivers in the mainstream kernels.

I would be glad to see megaraid 1.18k and megaraid2 2.00.9 be included
in 2.4.x-stock.  These seem stable in our testing thus far.  Alan has
had megaraid2 2.00.(something - 5?) in his tree for a while now.

Alan didn't want to lightswitch the 1.18X series driver out during a
stable kernel series, preferring to have both a megaraid and a megaraid2
driver, and let people decide.


> Are they in 2.6 already? 

2.6.x has megaraid 2.00.3 in it right now - it needs to be brought up to
2.00.9.  There's no reason to have both megaraid and megaraid2 in 2.6.x,
only one 'megaraid' which is 2.00.x.


Atul should be submitting changelogs and patches to James Bottomley and
linux-scsi for inclusion in both 2.4.x and 2.6.x, unless Marcelo asks to
receive them directly.

Thanks,
Matt

-- 
Matt Domsch
Sr. Software Engineer, Lead Engineer
Dell Linux Solutions www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* RE: Megaraid does not work with 2.4.22
@ 2003-09-30 19:21 Xose Vazquez Perez
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xose Vazquez Perez @ 2003-09-30 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, Tosatti, Mukker, Atul, linux-megaraid-devel

Marcelo Tosatti wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Mukker, Atul wrote:
> 
>> Marcelo,
>> 
>> What are your plans to integrate the 1.18k as well as 2.00.9 megaraid
>> drivers in the mainstream kernels.
> 
> Atul,
> 
> It depends on what they change and how extensively they have been tested.

kernel driver 1.xx is frozen since Dec-2002. Latest 1.xx _only_ fixes bugs
and adds support for ioctls on amd64. Not too much exciting.

2.xx driver adds support for latest hardware, MegaRAID Ultra320 RAID boards
(518, 520, 531, 532.). It was developed since Nov-2002 and it is included
in Red Hat Enterpise Linux 2.1 since May-2003.

Matt Domsch of Dell now is distribuyed both to their customers.
So they should be ready for official kernel inclusion.

I don't know what is the opinion of other people :-?
Maybe linux-scsi members hold other opinion.

> Are they in 2.6 already? 

no.

-thanks-

-- 
SCO before, Smoking Crack Often now.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E570185F531@exa-atlanta.se.lsil.com>]
* Megaraid does not work with 2.4.22
@ 2003-08-28 11:08 Krzysztof Olędzki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Olędzki @ 2003-08-28 11:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Atul Mukker

Hello,

It seems that Megaraid does not work with 2.4.22 at least on
my machine. I don't know when it stopped working because I have never used
this SCSI adapter before. During kernel boot magararid's driver generates
nasty opps. This is the output from oops parsed by ksymoops:

ksymoops 2.4.9 on i686 2.4.22.  Options used
     -V (default)
     -k /proc/ksyms (default)
     -l /proc/modules (default)
     -o /lib/modules/2.4.22 (specified)
     -m /boot/System.map-2.4.22 (specified)

Error (regular_file): read_ksyms stat /proc/ksyms failed
No modules in ksyms, skipping objects
No ksyms, skipping lsmod
cpu: 0, clocks: 1333384, slice: 666692
PI_DEBUG for details.
3c59x: Donald Becker and others. www.scyld.com/network/vortex.html
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000f
c0262330
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000
CPU:    0
EIP:    0010:[<c0262330>]    Not tainted
Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386
EFLAGS: 00010286
eax: cfeb0078   ebx: 00000000   ecx: 00000005   edx: 00000018
esi: 00000000   edi: 00000000   ebp: cfeb0078   esp: c12ddd44
ds: 0018   es: 0018   ss: 0018
Process swapper (pid: 1, stackpage=c12dd000)
Stack: c12dc000 cfee9860 04000001 c026207b cfeb0078 00000000 00000001 00000000
       c12dddcc c12ddd68 c12ddd68 00000000 c0426b60 fffffffe 00000046 c011bf02
       c011be16 00000000 00000001 00000046 c0426b60 c0426900 00000000 00000001
Call Trace:    [<c026207b>] [<c011bf02>] [<c011be16>] [<c0108b8e>] [<c010b2ad>]
  [<c01089d5>] [<c0108b54>] [<c010b1f8>] [<c0108fa1>] [<c0262030>] [<c0108c35>]
  [<c02630c9>] [<c0262030>] [<c01172ff>] [<c01173f5>] [<c0105000>] [<c0263669>]
  [<c02303e6>] [<c023a4c3>] [<c015cac2>] [<c0105000>] [<c0230235>] [<c0105000>]
  [<c015c927>] [<c015cd33>] [<c0105000>] [<c0105053>] [<c0105000>] [<c010579e>]
  [<c0105040>]
Code: 80 7e 0f 00 74 1e c7 04 24 58 8d 06 00 43 e8 cd b8 0d 00 81


>>EIP; c0262330 <mega_busyWaitMbox+20/50>   <=====

Trace; c026207b <megaraid_isr+4b/2e0>
Trace; c011bf02 <bh_action+22/40>
Trace; c011be16 <tasklet_hi_action+46/70>
Trace; c0108b8e <do_IRQ+9e/a0>
Trace; c010b2ad <call_apic_timer_interrupt+5/10>
Trace; c01089d5 <handle_IRQ_event+45/70>
Trace; c0108b54 <do_IRQ+64/a0>
Trace; c010b1f8 <call_do_IRQ+5/d>
Trace; c0108fa1 <setup_irq+71/a0>
Trace; c0262030 <megaraid_isr+0/2e0>
Trace; c0108c35 <request_irq+a5/e0>
Trace; c02630c9 <mega_findCard+3b9/7d0>
Trace; c0262030 <megaraid_isr+0/2e0>
Trace; c01172ff <__call_console_drivers+5f/70>
Trace; c01173f5 <call_console_drivers+65/120>
Trace; c0105000 <_stext+0/0>
Trace; c0263669 <megaraid_detect+189/2b0>
Trace; c02303e6 <scsi_unregister_host+1a6/480>
Trace; c023a4c3 <ahc_linux_detect+23/60>
Trace; c015cac2 <proc_create+b2/100>
Trace; c0105000 <_stext+0/0>
Trace; c0230235 <scsi_register_host+2e5/2f0>
Trace; c0105000 <_stext+0/0>
Trace; c015c927 <proc_register+17/a0>
Trace; c015cd33 <create_proc_entry+83/d0>
Trace; c0105000 <_stext+0/0>
Trace; c0105053 <init+13/130>
Trace; c0105000 <_stext+0/0>
Trace; c010579e <arch_kernel_thread+2e/40>
Trace; c0105040 <init+0/130>

Code;  c0262330 <mega_busyWaitMbox+20/50>
00000000 <_EIP>:
Code;  c0262330 <mega_busyWaitMbox+20/50>   <=====
   0:   80 7e 0f 00               cmpb   $0x0,0xf(%esi)   <=====
Code;  c0262334 <mega_busyWaitMbox+24/50>
   4:   74 1e                     je     24 <_EIP+0x24>
Code;  c0262336 <mega_busyWaitMbox+26/50>
   6:   c7 04 24 58 8d 06 00      movl   $0x68d58,(%esp,1)
Code;  c026233d <mega_busyWaitMbox+2d/50>
   d:   43                        inc    %ebx
Code;  c026233e <mega_busyWaitMbox+2e/50>
   e:   e8 cd b8 0d 00            call   db8e0 <_EIP+0xdb8e0>
Code;  c0262343 <mega_busyWaitMbox+33/50>
  13:   81 00 00 00 00 00         addl   $0x0,(%eax)

 <0>Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!

1 error issued.  Results may not be reliable.


Best Ragards,

				Krzysztof Olędzki


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-08 10:31 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-01 11:01 Megaraid does not work with 2.4.22 syn uw
2003-10-01 13:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-10-01 15:23   ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-10-01 16:08     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-10-07 17:44       ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-10-08  0:51         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-10-08  1:09           ` Xose Vazquez Perez
2003-10-08  1:49             ` Erik Andersen
2003-10-08 10:27             ` Marcelo Tosatti
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-01 23:33 Tomita, Haruo
2003-10-01 21:40 syn uw
2003-10-01  0:11 Tomita, Haruo
2003-09-30 19:34 Matt_Domsch
2003-09-30 19:21 Xose Vazquez Perez
     [not found] <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E570185F531@exa-atlanta.se.lsil.com>
2003-09-26  9:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-08-28 11:08 Krzysztof Olędzki

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).