Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] kallsyms: Rename is_kernel() and is_kernel_text()

[Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>]

On 2021/7/29 12:05, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 10:00:51 +0800
> Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2021/7/28 23:28, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:13:18 +0800
>>> Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>   
>>>> The is_kernel[_text]() function check the address whether or not
>>>> in kernel[_text] ranges, also they will check the address whether
>>>> or not in gate area, so use better name.
>>> Do you know what a gate area is?
>>>
>>> Because I believe gate area is kernel text, so the rename just makes it
>>> redundant and more confusing.
>> Yes, the gate area(eg, vectors part on ARM32, similar on x86/ia64) is
>> kernel text.
>>
>> I want to keep the 'basic' section boundaries check, which only check
>> the start/end
>>
>> of sections, all in section.h,  could we use 'generic' or 'basic' or
>> 'core' in the naming?
>>
>>    * is_kernel_generic_data()	--- come from core_kernel_data() in kernel.h
>>    * is_kernel_generic_text()
>>
>> The old helper could remain unchanged, any suggestion, thanks.
> Because it looks like the check of just being in the range of "_stext"
> to "_end" is just an internal helper, why not do what we do all over
> the kernel, and just prefix the function with a couple of underscores,
> that denote that it's internal?
>
>    __is_kernel_text()

OK， thanks for your advise,  there's already a __is_kernel_text() in 
arch/x86/mm/init_32.c,

I will change it to is_x32_kernel_text() to avoid conflict on x86_32.

>
> Then you have:
>
>   static inline int is_kernel_text(unsigned long addr)
>   {
> 	if (__is_kernel_text(addr))
>   		return 1;
>   	return in_gate_area_no_mm(addr);
>   }
>
> -- Steve
> .
>