From: Matthew Dobson <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
To: Keiichiro Tokunaga <tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] unregister_node() for hotplug use
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 11:15:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4280FA41.3050403@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050510202053.3ddd9e7b.tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com>
Keiichiro Tokunaga wrote:
> On Mon, 09 May 2005 15:44:03 -0700 Matthew Dobson wrote:
>>Is there a reason to not make both register_node() and unregister_node()
>>__devinit? If a user has CONFIG_HOTPLUG=y then they want these functions,
>>otherwise there is no point, as they promised they won't be hotplugging
>>anything, right?
>
> The main reason is Greg advised me that we had the function
> no matter if CONFIG_HOTPLUG is true or not. An addtional
> advantage of this is that the source becomes cleaner because
> I included unregister_node() with '#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG' and
> '#endif' in my previous version of patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Keiichiro Tokunaga
>
You're referring to this comment:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:39:20 -0700 Greg KH wrote:
>> And hey, what's the real big deal here, why not always have this
>> function no matter if CONFIG_HOTPLUG is enabled or not? I really want
>> to just make that an option that is always enabled anyway, but changable
>> if you are using CONFIG_TINY or something...
correct? I think GregKH was referring to you #ifdef'ing the function away
so that it isn't even there if CONFIG_HOTPLUG=n, which is completely
different from marking the function as __devinit.
If you mark the function as __devinit, it will still be there for the
kernel initialization phase whether CONFIG_HOTPLUG is on or off. What it
does mean, however, is that the function will get freed, along with the
rest of the functions/data marked __init or __initdata, if CONFIG_HOTPLUG
is off. If CONFIG_HOTPLUG is on, __devinit is defined to be nothing and
the function will remain because there is a possibility that someone will
call the function after the initialization phase. If CONFIG_HOTPLUG is
off, the user is assuring us that no devices will be hot-added or
hot-removed, so there is no point in bloating the kernel text (albeit very
slightly) with functions that we *know* won't be called.
So I think it's probably a good idea to stick the __devinit on
register_node() and unregister_node(), otherwise we have no marker to know
which functions to remove for CONFIG_TINY. Greg?
-Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-10 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-20 12:07 [RFC/PATCH] unregister_node() for hotplug use Keiichiro Tokunaga
2005-04-20 12:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-04-21 9:25 ` Keiichiro Tokunaga
2005-04-20 17:32 ` Greg KH
2005-04-21 15:30 ` Keiichiro Tokunaga
2005-04-22 0:39 ` Greg KH
2005-04-22 2:32 ` Keiichiro Tokunaga
2005-04-25 14:03 ` Keiichiro Tokunaga
2005-04-26 6:54 ` Greg KH
2005-04-28 0:17 ` Keiichiro Tokunaga
2005-05-07 12:11 ` Keiichiro Tokunaga
2005-05-08 0:26 ` Nathan Lynch
2005-05-08 12:28 ` Keiichiro Tokunaga
2005-05-09 22:44 ` Matthew Dobson
2005-05-10 11:20 ` Keiichiro Tokunaga
2005-05-10 18:15 ` Matthew Dobson [this message]
2005-05-10 18:45 ` Greg KH
2005-05-10 18:58 ` Matthew Dobson
2005-05-10 20:11 ` Greg KH
2005-05-10 20:13 ` Matthew Dobson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4280FA41.3050403@us.ibm.com \
--to=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).