From: John Richard Moser <nigelenki@comcast.net>
To: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: soft update vs journaling?
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:09:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43D43AF3.1090801@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43D42CCE.9010709@FreeBSD.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Suleiman Souhlal wrote:
> John Richard Moser wrote:
>
>> Yeah, the huge TB fsck thing became a problem. I wonder still if it'd
>> be useful for small vfat file systems (floppies, usb drives); nobody has
>> led me to believe it's definitely feasible to not corrupt meta-data in
>> this way.
>
>
> Please note that you don't *HAVE* to run fsck at every reboot. All
> background fsck does is reclaim unused blocks.
>
Duly noted, now can you answer my question?
> -- Suleiman
>
- --
All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the
Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated.
Creative brains are a valuable, limited resource. They shouldn't be
wasted on re-inventing the wheel when there are so many fascinating
new problems waiting out there.
-- Eric Steven Raymond
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFD1DryhDd4aOud5P8RAjiwAJ9xH5V/W2i5U/oVzT6AjdmBVk5+iwCfWD2j
JzBRinqiqDd/rIQFkS9QIsQ=
=SlOI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-23 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-22 6:42 soft update vs journaling? John Richard Moser
2006-01-22 8:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-22 18:40 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-22 19:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-22 19:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-22 19:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-24 2:33 ` Jörn Engel
2006-01-22 9:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-01-22 18:54 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-22 21:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-01-22 22:44 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-23 7:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-01-23 13:31 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2006-01-23 13:33 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-23 13:52 ` Antonio Vargas
2006-01-23 16:48 ` Linux VFS architecture questions Kyle Moffett
2006-01-23 17:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-01-23 17:50 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-23 17:54 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-23 20:48 ` soft update vs journaling? Folkert van Heusden
2006-01-23 1:02 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-22 19:50 ` Diego Calleja
2006-01-22 20:39 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2006-01-22 20:50 ` Diego Calleja
2006-01-23 1:00 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-23 1:09 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2006-01-23 2:09 ` John Richard Moser [this message]
2006-01-22 19:26 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-01-23 0:06 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-23 5:32 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-23 18:52 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-23 19:32 ` Matthias Andree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43D43AF3.1090801@comcast.net \
--to=nigelenki@comcast.net \
--cc=diegocg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).