From: Diego Calleja <diegocg@gmail.com>
To: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, nigelenki@comcast.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: soft update vs journaling?
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:50:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060122215032.c9e4197e.diegocg@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43D3ED8A.3070606@FreeBSD.org>
El Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:39:38 -0800,
Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org> escribió:
> Diego Calleja wrote:
> > And FreeBSD is implementing journaling for UFS and getting rid of
> > softupdates [1]. While this not proves that softupdates is "a bad idea",
> > i think this proves why the added sofupdates complexity doesn't seem
> > to pay off in the real world.
>
> You read the message wrong: We're not getting rid of softupdates.
> -- Suleiman
Oh, both systems will be available at the same time? That will be
certainyl a good place to compare both approachs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-22 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-22 6:42 soft update vs journaling? John Richard Moser
2006-01-22 8:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-01-22 18:40 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-22 19:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-22 19:08 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-22 19:25 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-24 2:33 ` Jörn Engel
2006-01-22 9:31 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-01-22 18:54 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-22 21:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-01-22 22:44 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-23 7:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2006-01-23 13:31 ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2006-01-23 13:33 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-23 13:52 ` Antonio Vargas
2006-01-23 16:48 ` Linux VFS architecture questions Kyle Moffett
2006-01-23 17:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-01-23 17:50 ` Kyle Moffett
2006-01-23 17:54 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-23 20:48 ` soft update vs journaling? Folkert van Heusden
2006-01-23 1:02 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-22 19:50 ` Diego Calleja
2006-01-22 20:39 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2006-01-22 20:50 ` Diego Calleja [this message]
2006-01-23 1:00 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-23 1:09 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2006-01-23 2:09 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-22 19:26 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2006-01-23 0:06 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-23 5:32 ` Michael Loftis
2006-01-23 18:52 ` John Richard Moser
2006-01-23 19:32 ` Matthias Andree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060122215032.c9e4197e.diegocg@gmail.com \
--to=diegocg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nigelenki@comcast.net \
--cc=ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).