linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SATA_SIL on IXP425 workaround
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 23:03:27 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B51489F.8010105@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100114210515.7a477a43@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>

On 01/14/2010 03:05 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> We need to use the MMIO BAR at least for starting DMA transfers, the
>> I/O ones are 64KB-limited. We can't just use read[bw] if reading all
>> 32 bits has side effects.
>
> Last time I instrumented this on x86 we never issued a>  64K linear block
> in our s/g lists. In fact we went for years before anyone noticed we had
> a bug with CS5530 and a couple of other chips that mishandled 64K segment
> sizes, and that was only finally noticed in a very specific and weird
> circumstance.

Having a block over 64KB may be rare, but the other thing that the large 
block transfer feature does is remove the restriction on a block 
crossing a 64KB boundary, which based on the experiments I did when I 
worked on adding the feature, does happen fairly commonly if the driver 
allows it.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-16  5:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-09 17:31 SATA_SIL on IXP425 workaround Krzysztof Halasa
2010-01-14 15:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2010-01-14 18:08   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-01-14 19:22   ` Alan Cox
2010-01-14 20:12     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-01-14 21:05       ` Alan Cox
2010-01-16  5:03         ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2010-01-14 20:29     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2010-01-14 21:00       ` Alan Cox
2010-01-21  5:00         ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-21  4:58   ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-21  6:48     ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-21 18:37       ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-21 21:47         ` Krzysztof Halasa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B51489F.8010105@gmail.com \
    --to=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).