linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: SATA_SIL on IXP425 workaround
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:47:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3sk9zceqf.fsf@intrepid.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B589EFC.6050002@garzik.org> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Thu, 21 Jan 2010 13:37:48 -0500")

Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> writes:

> It is definitely possible to do all 32-bit accesses...  but that
> requires activating and exclusively using the command buffering
> feature, because direct 32-bit access to the taskfile registers will
> result in a 32-bit access to Data rather than the desired effect.

Command buffering? The DS for SIL3512 lists IDEx taskfile registers
for command buffering, but I can't see any explanation there.

BTW I don't know requirements of other platforms, but IXP4xx has only
problems with 8- and 16-bit PCI memory reads. Other ops including
all memory writes, and all "port" I/O are ok.

Unfortunately I can't test any patch ATM, -ENOHW. I might be able to get
access to this hw again, but I don't know at this point.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa

      reply	other threads:[~2010-01-21 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-09 17:31 SATA_SIL on IXP425 workaround Krzysztof Halasa
2010-01-14 15:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2010-01-14 18:08   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-01-14 19:22   ` Alan Cox
2010-01-14 20:12     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2010-01-14 21:05       ` Alan Cox
2010-01-16  5:03         ` Robert Hancock
2010-01-14 20:29     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2010-01-14 21:00       ` Alan Cox
2010-01-21  5:00         ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-21  4:58   ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-21  6:48     ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-21 18:37       ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-21 21:47         ` Krzysztof Halasa [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3sk9zceqf.fsf@intrepid.localdomain \
    --to=khc@pm.waw.pl \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).