linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	cl@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] zsmalloc: zsmalloc: align cache line size
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 08:40:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA7C2BC.2090400@vflare.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1205071038090.2851@tux.localdomain>

On 5/7/12 3:41 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2012, Minchan Kim wrote:
>>>> It's a overkill to align pool size with PAGE_SIZE to avoid
>>>> false-sharing. This patch aligns it with just cache line size.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim<minchan@kernel.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c |    6 +++---
>>>>    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
>>>> b/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
>>>> index 51074fa..3991b03 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
>>>> @@ -489,14 +489,14 @@ fail:
>>>>
>>>>    struct zs_pool *zs_create_pool(const char *name, gfp_t flags)
>>>>    {
>>>> -    int i, error, ovhd_size;
>>>> +    int i, error;
>>>>        struct zs_pool *pool;
>>>>
>>>>        if (!name)
>>>>            return NULL;
>>>>
>>>> -    ovhd_size = roundup(sizeof(*pool), PAGE_SIZE);
>>>> -    pool = kzalloc(ovhd_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +    pool = kzalloc(ALIGN(sizeof(*pool), cache_line_size()),
>>>> +                GFP_KERNEL);
>>>
>>> a basic question:
>>>   Is rounding off allocation size to cache_line_size enough to ensure
>>> that the object is cache-line-aligned? Isn't it possible that even
>>> though the object size is multiple of cache-line, it may still not be
>>> properly aligned and end up sharing cache line with some other
>>> read-mostly object?
>>
>> AFAIK, SLAB allocates object aligned cache-size so I think that problem cannot happen.
>> But needs double check.
>> Cced Pekka.
>
> The kmalloc(size) function only gives you the following guarantees:
>
>    (1) The allocated object is _at least_ 'size' bytes.
>
>    (2) The returned pointer is aligned to ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN.
>
> Anything beyond that is implementation detail and probably will break if
> you switch between SLAB/SLUB/SLOB.
>
> 			Pekka

So, we can probably leave it as is (PAGE_SIZE aligned) or use 
kmem_cache_create(...,SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN,...) for allocating 'struct 
zs_pool's.

zcache can potentially create a lot of pools, so the latter will save 
some memory.

Thanks,
Nitin

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-07 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-03  6:40 [PATCH 1/4] zsmalloc: rename zspage_order with zspage_pages Minchan Kim
2012-05-03  6:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] zsmalloc: add/fix function comment Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 13:19   ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-03  6:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] zsmalloc use zs_handle instead of void * Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 13:32   ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-03 15:23     ` Seth Jennings
2012-05-04  2:24       ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-07 15:01         ` Seth Jennings
2012-05-09 20:19         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-05-10  2:03           ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-10 14:02             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-10 14:12               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-05-10 14:47               ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-10 15:00                 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-10 15:11                 ` Seth Jennings
2012-05-10 15:19                   ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-10 15:19                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-05-10 16:29                     ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-10 16:44                       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-05-10 17:24                         ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-10 17:33                           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-10 23:24                             ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-10 23:50                               ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-11  0:14                                 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-11 16:31                                   ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-11 19:29                                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-11 21:49                                     ` Seth Jennings
2012-05-14  2:26                                       ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-11 19:28                               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-14  2:18                                 ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-15  1:57                                   ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-15  2:21                                     ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-15 15:04                                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-16  1:36                                     ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-16 11:06                                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-03  6:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] zsmalloc: zsmalloc: align cache line size Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 13:58   ` Nitin Gupta
2012-05-04  2:27     ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-07  7:41       ` Pekka Enberg
2012-05-07 12:40         ` Nitin Gupta [this message]
2012-05-08  1:34           ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-08 14:00             ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-09  0:58               ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-09  3:08                 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-09  4:07                   ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-11  0:03                 ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-05-11  0:25                   ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-11 19:06                     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-14  1:55                       ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-15 15:18                         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-05-16  1:44                           ` Minchan Kim
2012-05-03 13:18 ` [PATCH 1/4] zsmalloc: rename zspage_order with zspage_pages Nitin Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FA7C2BC.2090400@vflare.org \
    --to=ngupta@vflare.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).