From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, 3.7-rc7, RESEND] fs: revert commit bbdd6808 to fallocate UAPI
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 16:01:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50C2674F.1060305@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121207211440.GD29435@thunk.org>
On 12/7/12 3:14 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 02:30:19PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> How is this similar? By adding this bit, we removed incentive from a
>> group of developers that have the means to fix the real issue at hand
>> (the performance problem with ext4). Thus, it means that they have a work
>> around that's good enough for them, but the rest of us suffer.
>
> That assumes that there **is** a way to claw back the performance
> loss, and Chris Mason has demonstrated the performance hit exists with
> xfs as well (950 MB/s vs. 400 MB/s; that's more than a factor of two).
But he has not demonstrated that it can't be improved in XFS; I don't
think that anyone in the XFS community has even begun to look at
whether it can be improved ...
> Sometimes, you have to make the engineering tradeoffs. That's why
> we're engineers, for goodness sakes. Sometimes, it's just not
> possible to square the circle.
... so this strikes me as a bit premature.
> I don't believe that the technique of forcing people who need that
> performance to suffer in order to induce them to try to engineer a
> solution which may or may not exist is really the best or fairest way
> to go about things.
Have we exhausted efforts to improve ext4 as well? Have we even identified
the performance bottlenecks yet via profiling?
What this seems to be is behavior nobody has asked for (expose
other users' stale data) in the name of solving a performance problem
(fine-grained conversion of unwritten extents comes at a non-negligible cost).
-Eric
> - Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-07 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-19 23:04 [PATCH] fs: revert commit bbdd6808 to fallocate UAPI Dave Chinner
2012-11-20 16:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-11-26 0:28 ` [PATCH, 3.7-rc7, RESEND] " Dave Chinner
2012-11-26 2:55 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 6:14 ` Tao Ma
2012-11-26 9:12 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-05 10:48 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-05 15:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-05 16:18 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-05 16:33 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-05 17:24 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-05 17:34 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-05 17:55 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-06 0:42 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-06 9:24 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-05 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-06 1:14 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-06 3:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-06 9:37 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-07 1:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07 2:40 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-07 10:24 ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-12-06 12:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-06 16:50 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-07 1:57 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-06 12:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2012-12-07 1:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-12-07 3:19 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-07 17:36 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-07 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-12-07 19:03 ` Chris Mason
2012-12-07 20:43 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-07 21:09 ` Chris Mason
2012-12-07 21:27 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-07 21:43 ` Chris Mason
2012-12-07 21:49 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-07 21:57 ` Chris Mason
2012-12-07 22:51 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-12-07 22:52 ` Eric Sandeen
2012-12-07 21:42 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-07 21:57 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-07 22:02 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-08 0:39 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-08 2:52 ` Joel Becker
2012-12-08 4:04 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-08 0:17 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-08 1:39 ` Chris Mason
2012-12-10 16:02 ` Chris Mason
2012-12-10 17:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-10 18:05 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-12-10 18:13 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-10 18:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-11 12:16 ` Steven Whitehouse
2012-12-11 22:09 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-10 18:52 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-11 0:52 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-07 19:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2012-12-07 21:14 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-12-07 21:47 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-07 23:25 ` Howard Chu
2012-12-08 0:50 ` Dave Chinner
2012-12-08 13:52 ` Howard Chu
2012-12-08 14:02 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-12-07 22:01 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2012-12-09 21:37 ` Ric Wheeler
2012-11-26 11:53 ` Alan Cox
2012-11-26 14:43 ` Theodore Ts'o
2012-11-26 21:12 ` Dave Chinner
2012-11-27 13:44 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50C2674F.1060305@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rwheeler@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).