linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] of: Create function for counting number of phandles in a property
@ 2013-02-10 23:58 Grant Likely
  2013-02-11 11:26 ` Andreas Larsson
  2013-02-12  9:18 ` Andreas Larsson
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2013-02-10 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel
  Cc: Grant Likely, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring, Andreas Larsson

This patch creates of_count_phandle_with_args(), a new function for
counting the number of phandle+argument tuples in a given property. This
is better than the existing method of parsing each phandle individually
until parsing fails which is a horribly slow way to do the count.

It also converts of_gpio_named_count() to use the new function instead
of using the above described horrible method.

This also requires the return value of of_gpio_count() &
of_gpio_named_count() from 'unsigned int' to 'int' so that it can return
an error code. All the users of that function are fixed up to correctly
handle a negative return value.

Tested on ARM using the selftest code.

Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Cc: Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c              |   35 ---------------------
 drivers/hwmon/gpio-fan.c               |    4 +--
 drivers/input/keyboard/matrix_keypad.c |    8 ++---
 drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c        |    4 +--
 drivers/of/base.c                      |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 drivers/of/selftest.c                  |   23 +++++++++++++-
 drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c              |    4 +--
 drivers/spi/spi-oc-tiny.c              |    8 ++---
 drivers/spi/spi-ppc4xx.c               |    4 +--
 include/linux/of.h                     |    9 ++++++
 include/linux/of_gpio.h                |   30 +++++++++++++++---
 11 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
index d542a14..dd8a212 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
@@ -89,41 +89,6 @@ int of_get_named_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np, const char *propname,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_named_gpio_flags);
 
 /**
- * of_gpio_named_count - Count GPIOs for a device
- * @np:		device node to count GPIOs for
- * @propname:	property name containing gpio specifier(s)
- *
- * The function returns the count of GPIOs specified for a node.
- *
- * Note that the empty GPIO specifiers counts too. For example,
- *
- * gpios = <0
- *          &pio1 1 2
- *          0
- *          &pio2 3 4>;
- *
- * defines four GPIOs (so this function will return 4), two of which
- * are not specified.
- */
-unsigned int of_gpio_named_count(struct device_node *np, const char* propname)
-{
-	unsigned int cnt = 0;
-
-	do {
-		int ret;
-
-		ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, propname, "#gpio-cells",
-						 cnt, NULL);
-		/* A hole in the gpios = <> counts anyway. */
-		if (ret < 0 && ret != -EEXIST)
-			break;
-	} while (++cnt);
-
-	return cnt;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_gpio_named_count);
-
-/**
  * of_gpio_simple_xlate - translate gpio_spec to the GPIO number and flags
  * @gc:		pointer to the gpio_chip structure
  * @np:		device node of the GPIO chip
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/gpio-fan.c b/drivers/hwmon/gpio-fan.c
index 4e04c12..3978194 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/gpio-fan.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/gpio-fan.c
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ static int gpio_fan_get_of_pdata(struct device *dev,
 
 	/* Fill GPIO pin array */
 	pdata->num_ctrl = of_gpio_count(node);
-	if (!pdata->num_ctrl) {
+	if (pdata->num_ctrl <= 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "gpios DT property empty / missing");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int gpio_fan_get_of_pdata(struct device *dev,
 	pdata->speed = speed;
 
 	/* Alarm GPIO if one exists */
-	if (of_gpio_named_count(node, "alarm-gpios")) {
+	if (of_gpio_named_count(node, "alarm-gpios") > 0) {
 		struct gpio_fan_alarm *alarm;
 		int val;
 		enum of_gpio_flags flags;
diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/matrix_keypad.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/matrix_keypad.c
index f4ff0dd..71d7719 100644
--- a/drivers/input/keyboard/matrix_keypad.c
+++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/matrix_keypad.c
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ matrix_keypad_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
 	struct matrix_keypad_platform_data *pdata;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
 	unsigned int *gpios;
-	int i;
+	int i, nrow, ncol;
 
 	if (!np) {
 		dev_err(dev, "device lacks DT data\n");
@@ -416,9 +416,9 @@ matrix_keypad_parse_dt(struct device *dev)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 	}
 
-	pdata->num_row_gpios = of_gpio_named_count(np, "row-gpios");
-	pdata->num_col_gpios = of_gpio_named_count(np, "col-gpios");
-	if (!pdata->num_row_gpios || !pdata->num_col_gpios) {
+	pdata->num_row_gpios = nrow = of_gpio_named_count(np, "row-gpios");
+	pdata->num_col_gpios = ncol = of_gpio_named_count(np, "col-gpios");
+	if (nrow <= 0 || ncol <= 0) {
 		dev_err(dev, "number of keypad rows/columns not specified\n");
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c
index 0c9accb..e91d7d7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/mdio-mux-gpio.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static int mdio_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	enum of_gpio_flags f;
 	struct mdio_mux_gpio_state *s;
-	unsigned int num_gpios;
+	int num_gpios;
 	unsigned int n;
 	int r;
 
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int mdio_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	num_gpios = of_gpio_count(pdev->dev.of_node);
-	if (num_gpios == 0 || num_gpios > MDIO_MUX_GPIO_MAX_BITS)
+	if (num_gpios <= 0 || num_gpios > MDIO_MUX_GPIO_MAX_BITS)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	s = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*s), GFP_KERNEL);
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 2390ddb..e1120a2 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -1025,12 +1025,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_parse_phandle);
  * To get a device_node of the `node2' node you may call this:
  * of_parse_phandle_with_args(node3, "list", "#list-cells", 1, &args);
  */
-int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_name,
-				const char *cells_name, int index,
-				struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
+static int __of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np,
+					const char *list_name,
+					const char *cells_name, int index,
+					struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
 {
 	const __be32 *list, *list_end;
-	int size, cur_index = 0;
+	int rc = 0, size, cur_index = 0;
 	uint32_t count = 0;
 	struct device_node *node = NULL;
 	phandle phandle;
@@ -1059,12 +1060,14 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_na
 			if (!node) {
 				pr_err("%s: could not find phandle\n",
 					 np->full_name);
+				rc = -EINVAL;
 				break;
 			}
 			if (of_property_read_u32(node, cells_name, &count)) {
 				pr_err("%s: could not get %s for %s\n",
 					 np->full_name, cells_name,
 					 node->full_name);
+				rc = -EINVAL;
 				break;
 			}
 
@@ -1075,6 +1078,7 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_na
 			if (list + count > list_end) {
 				pr_err("%s: arguments longer than property\n",
 					 np->full_name);
+				rc = -EINVAL;
 				break;
 			}
 		}
@@ -1086,8 +1090,10 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_na
 		 * or return -ENOENT for an empty entry.
 		 */
 		if (cur_index == index) {
-			if (!phandle)
-				return -ENOENT;
+			if (!phandle) {
+				rc = -ENOENT;
+				break;
+			}
 
 			if (out_args) {
 				int i;
@@ -1098,22 +1104,54 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_na
 				for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
 					out_args->args[i] = be32_to_cpup(list++);
 			}
-			return 0;
+
+			rc = 0;
+			break;
 		}
 
 		of_node_put(node);
 		node = NULL;
 		list += count;
 		cur_index++;
+		rc = cur_index;
 	}
 
 	/* Loop exited without finding a valid entry; return an error */
 	if (node)
 		of_node_put(node);
-	return -EINVAL;
+	return rc;
+}
+
+int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_name,
+				const char *cells_name, int index,
+				struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
+{
+	return __of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list_name, cells_name, index, out_args);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_parse_phandle_with_args);
 
+/**
+ * of_count_phandle_with_args() - Find the number of phandles references in a property
+ * @np:		pointer to a device tree node containing a list
+ * @list_name:	property name that contains a list
+ * @cells_name:	property name that specifies phandles' arguments count
+ *
+ * Returns the number of phandle + argument tuples within a property. It
+ * is a typical pattern to encode a list of phandle and variable
+ * arguments into a single property. The number of arguments is encoded
+ * by a property in the phandle-target node. For example, a gpios
+ * property would contain a list of GPIO specifies consisting of a
+ * phandle and 1 or more arguments. The number of arguments are
+ * determined by the #gpio-cells property in the node pointed to by the
+ * phandle.
+ */
+int of_count_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_name,
+				const char *cells_name)
+{
+	return __of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list_name, cells_name, -1, NULL);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_count_phandle_with_args);
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC)
 static int of_property_notify(int action, struct device_node *np,
 			      struct property *prop)
diff --git a/drivers/of/selftest.c b/drivers/of/selftest.c
index f24ffd7..e3a03d5 100644
--- a/drivers/of/selftest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/selftest.c
@@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ static void __init of_selftest_parse_phandle_with_args(void)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	rc = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "phandle-list", "#phandle-cells");
+	if (rc != 7)
+		pr_err("of_count_phandle_with_args() returned %i, expected 7\n", rc);
+	passed_all &= (rc == 7);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < 7; i++) {
 		bool passed = true;
 		rc = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "phandle-list",
@@ -100,22 +105,38 @@ static void __init of_selftest_parse_phandle_with_args(void)
 	/* Check for missing list property */
 	rc = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "phandle-list-missing",
 					"#phandle-cells", 0, &args);
-	passed_all &= (rc == -EINVAL);
+	passed_all &= (rc == -ENOENT);
+	rc = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "phandle-list-missing",
+					"#phandle-cells");
+	passed_all &= (rc == -ENOENT);
+	pr_err("rc = %i\n", rc);
 
 	/* Check for missing cells property */
 	rc = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "phandle-list",
 					"#phandle-cells-missing", 0, &args);
 	passed_all &= (rc == -EINVAL);
+	rc = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "phandle-list",
+					"#phandle-cells-missing");
+	passed_all &= (rc == -EINVAL);
+	pr_err("rc = %i\n", rc);
 
 	/* Check for bad phandle in list */
 	rc = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "phandle-list-bad-phandle",
 					"#phandle-cells", 0, &args);
 	passed_all &= (rc == -EINVAL);
+	rc = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "phandle-list-bad-phandle",
+					"#phandle-cells");
+	passed_all &= (rc == -EINVAL);
+	pr_err("rc = %i\n", rc);
 
 	/* Check for incorrectly formed argument list */
 	rc = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "phandle-list-bad-args",
 					"#phandle-cells", 1, &args);
 	passed_all &= (rc == -EINVAL);
+	rc = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "phandle-list-bad-args",
+					"#phandle-cells");
+	passed_all &= (rc == -EINVAL);
+	pr_err("rc = %i\n", rc);
 
 	pr_info("end - %s\n", passed_all ? "PASS" : "FAIL");
 }
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c
index 1a7f635..086a9ee 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-spi.c
@@ -947,12 +947,12 @@ static int of_fsl_spi_get_chipselects(struct device *dev)
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
 	struct fsl_spi_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;
 	struct mpc8xxx_spi_probe_info *pinfo = to_of_pinfo(pdata);
-	unsigned int ngpios;
+	int ngpios;
 	int i = 0;
 	int ret;
 
 	ngpios = of_gpio_count(np);
-	if (!ngpios) {
+	if (ngpios <= 0) {
 		/*
 		 * SPI w/o chip-select line. One SPI device is still permitted
 		 * though.
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-oc-tiny.c b/drivers/spi/spi-oc-tiny.c
index 432e66e..cb2e284 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-oc-tiny.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-oc-tiny.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ struct tiny_spi {
 	unsigned int txc, rxc;
 	const u8 *txp;
 	u8 *rxp;
-	unsigned int gpio_cs_count;
+	int gpio_cs_count;
 	int *gpio_cs;
 };
 
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void tiny_spi_chipselect(struct spi_device *spi, int is_active)
 {
 	struct tiny_spi *hw = tiny_spi_to_hw(spi);
 
-	if (hw->gpio_cs_count) {
+	if (hw->gpio_cs_count > 0) {
 		gpio_set_value(hw->gpio_cs[spi->chip_select],
 			(spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH) ? is_active : !is_active);
 	}
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static int tiny_spi_of_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!np)
 		return 0;
 	hw->gpio_cs_count = of_gpio_count(np);
-	if (hw->gpio_cs_count) {
+	if (hw->gpio_cs_count > 0) {
 		hw->gpio_cs = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
 				hw->gpio_cs_count * sizeof(unsigned int),
 				GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ static int tiny_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 			goto exit_gpio;
 		gpio_direction_output(hw->gpio_cs[i], 1);
 	}
-	hw->bitbang.master->num_chipselect = max(1U, hw->gpio_cs_count);
+	hw->bitbang.master->num_chipselect = max(1, hw->gpio_cs_count);
 
 	/* register our spi controller */
 	err = spi_bitbang_start(&hw->bitbang);
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ppc4xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ppc4xx.c
index 7a85f22..af3e6e7 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ppc4xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ppc4xx.c
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int __init spi_ppc4xx_of_probe(struct platform_device *op)
 	 * This includes both "null" gpio's and real ones.
 	 */
 	num_gpios = of_gpio_count(np);
-	if (num_gpios) {
+	if (num_gpios > 0) {
 		int i;
 
 		hw->gpios = kzalloc(sizeof(int) * num_gpios, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ static int __init spi_ppc4xx_of_probe(struct platform_device *op)
 		SPI_CPHA | SPI_CPOL | SPI_CS_HIGH | SPI_LSB_FIRST;
 
 	/* this many pins in all GPIO controllers */
-	bbp->master->num_chipselect = num_gpios;
+	bbp->master->num_chipselect = num_gpios > 0 ? num_gpios : 0;
 
 	/* Get the clock for the OPB */
 	opbnp = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "ibm,opb");
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index 5ebcc5c..fabc610 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -277,6 +277,8 @@ extern struct device_node *of_parse_phandle(const struct device_node *np,
 extern int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np,
 	const char *list_name, const char *cells_name, int index,
 	struct of_phandle_args *out_args);
+extern int of_count_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np,
+	const char *list_name, const char *cells_name);
 
 extern void of_alias_scan(void * (*dt_alloc)(u64 size, u64 align));
 extern int of_alias_get_id(struct device_node *np, const char *stem);
@@ -467,6 +469,13 @@ static inline int of_parse_phandle_with_args(struct device_node *np,
 	return -ENOSYS;
 }
 
+static inline int of_parse_count_with_args(struct device_node *np,
+					   const char *list_name,
+					   const char *cells_name)
+{
+	return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
 static inline int of_alias_get_id(struct device_node *np, const char *stem)
 {
 	return -ENOSYS;
diff --git a/include/linux/of_gpio.h b/include/linux/of_gpio.h
index c454f57..bdbe0f3 100644
--- a/include/linux/of_gpio.h
+++ b/include/linux/of_gpio.h
@@ -50,8 +50,28 @@ static inline struct of_mm_gpio_chip *to_of_mm_gpio_chip(struct gpio_chip *gc)
 extern int of_get_named_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np,
 		const char *list_name, int index, enum of_gpio_flags *flags);
 
-extern unsigned int of_gpio_named_count(struct device_node *np,
-					const char* propname);
+/**
+ * of_gpio_named_count - Count GPIOs for a device
+ * @np:		device node to count GPIOs for
+ * @propname:	property name containing gpio specifier(s)
+ *
+ * The function returns the count of GPIOs specified for a node.
+ *
+ * Note that the empty GPIO specifiers counts too. For example,
+ *
+ * gpios = <0
+ *          &pio1 1 2
+ *          0
+ *          &pio2 3 4>;
+ *
+ * defines four GPIOs (so this function will return 4), two of which
+ * are not specified. Returns -EINVAL for an incorrectly formed gpios
+ * property.
+ */
+static int of_gpio_named_count(struct device_node *np, const char* propname)
+{
+	return of_count_phandle_with_args(np, propname, "#gpio-cells");
+}
 
 extern int of_mm_gpiochip_add(struct device_node *np,
 			      struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc);
@@ -71,10 +91,10 @@ static inline int of_get_named_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np,
 	return -ENOSYS;
 }
 
-static inline unsigned int of_gpio_named_count(struct device_node *np,
+static inline int of_gpio_named_count(struct device_node *np,
 					const char* propname)
 {
-	return 0;
+	return -ENOSYS;
 }
 
 static inline int of_gpio_simple_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
@@ -105,7 +125,7 @@ static inline void of_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *gc) { }
  * defines four GPIOs (so this function will return 4), two of which
  * are not specified.
  */
-static inline unsigned int of_gpio_count(struct device_node *np)
+static inline int of_gpio_count(struct device_node *np)
 {
 	return of_gpio_named_count(np, "gpios");
 }
-- 
1.7.10.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of: Create function for counting number of phandles in a property
  2013-02-10 23:58 [PATCH] of: Create function for counting number of phandles in a property Grant Likely
@ 2013-02-11 11:26 ` Andreas Larsson
  2013-02-12 17:25   ` Grant Likely
  2013-02-12  9:18 ` Andreas Larsson
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Larsson @ 2013-02-11 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Grant Likely; +Cc: devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring

On 2013-02-11 00:58, Grant Likely wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index 2390ddb..e1120a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -1025,12 +1025,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_parse_phandle);
>    * To get a device_node of the `node2' node you may call this:
>    * of_parse_phandle_with_args(node3, "list", "#list-cells", 1, &args);
>    */
> -int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_name,
> -				const char *cells_name, int index,
> -				struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
> +static int __of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np,
> +					const char *list_name,
> +					const char *cells_name, int index,
> +					struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
>   {
>   	const __be32 *list, *list_end;
> -	int size, cur_index = 0;
> +	int rc = 0, size, cur_index = 0;
>   	uint32_t count = 0;
>   	struct device_node *node = NULL;
>   	phandle phandle;
> @@ -1059,12 +1060,14 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_na
>   			if (!node) {
>   				pr_err("%s: could not find phandle\n",
>   					 np->full_name);
> +				rc = -EINVAL;
>   				break;
>   			}
>   			if (of_property_read_u32(node, cells_name, &count)) {
>   				pr_err("%s: could not get %s for %s\n",
>   					 np->full_name, cells_name,
>   					 node->full_name);
> +				rc = -EINVAL;
>   				break;
>   			}
>
> @@ -1075,6 +1078,7 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_na
>   			if (list + count > list_end) {
>   				pr_err("%s: arguments longer than property\n",
>   					 np->full_name);
> +				rc = -EINVAL;
>   				break;
>   			}
>   		}
> @@ -1086,8 +1090,10 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_na
>   		 * or return -ENOENT for an empty entry.
>   		 */
>   		if (cur_index == index) {
> -			if (!phandle)
> -				return -ENOENT;
> +			if (!phandle) {
> +				rc = -ENOENT;
> +				break;
> +			}
>
>   			if (out_args) {
>   				int i;
> @@ -1098,22 +1104,54 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_na
>   				for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
>   					out_args->args[i] = be32_to_cpup(list++);
>   			}
> -			return 0;
> +
> +			rc = 0;
> +			break;
>   		}
>
>   		of_node_put(node);
>   		node = NULL;
>   		list += count;
>   		cur_index++;
> +		rc = cur_index;
>   	}
>
>   	/* Loop exited without finding a valid entry; return an error */
>   	if (node)
>   		of_node_put(node);
> -	return -EINVAL;
> +	return rc;
> +}
> +
> +int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_name,
> +				const char *cells_name, int index,
> +				struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
> +{
> +	return __of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list_name, cells_name, index, out_args);
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_parse_phandle_with_args);

Will this not result in a situation where a call to 
of_parse_phandle_with_args with an out of bounds index returns the 
number of tuples instead of an error code and possibly some caller that 
uses the this count as a phandle instead of handling an error?

Of course of_count_phandle_with_args can be used to make sure that no 
such call is made in the first place, but that is another story.

Related to this is that Case 7 in of_selftest_parse_phandle_with_args 
never gets exercised as far as I can see.


> diff --git a/include/linux/of_gpio.h b/include/linux/of_gpio.h
> index c454f57..bdbe0f3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_gpio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_gpio.h
> @@ -50,8 +50,28 @@ static inline struct of_mm_gpio_chip *to_of_mm_gpio_chip(struct gpio_chip *gc)
>   extern int of_get_named_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np,
>   		const char *list_name, int index, enum of_gpio_flags *flags);
>
> -extern unsigned int of_gpio_named_count(struct device_node *np,
> -					const char* propname);
> +/**
> + * of_gpio_named_count - Count GPIOs for a device
> + * @np:		device node to count GPIOs for
> + * @propname:	property name containing gpio specifier(s)
> + *
> + * The function returns the count of GPIOs specified for a node.
> + *
> + * Note that the empty GPIO specifiers counts too. For example,
> + *
> + * gpios = <0
> + *          &pio1 1 2
> + *          0
> + *          &pio2 3 4>;
> + *
> + * defines four GPIOs (so this function will return 4), two of which
> + * are not specified. Returns -EINVAL for an incorrectly formed gpios
> + * property.
> + */
> +static int of_gpio_named_count(struct device_node *np, const char* propname)
> +{
> +	return of_count_phandle_with_args(np, propname, "#gpio-cells");
> +}

Should this be static inline int?

I think it would be good to also document that it also returns -ENOENT 
when the propname property is missing, which might be an important case 
to distinguish from the -EINVAL case.


Cheers,
Andreas Larsson


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of: Create function for counting number of phandles in a property
  2013-02-10 23:58 [PATCH] of: Create function for counting number of phandles in a property Grant Likely
  2013-02-11 11:26 ` Andreas Larsson
@ 2013-02-12  9:18 ` Andreas Larsson
  2013-02-12 17:28   ` Grant Likely
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Larsson @ 2013-02-12  9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Grant Likely; +Cc: devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring

On 2013-02-11 00:58, Grant Likely wrote:
> This patch creates of_count_phandle_with_args(), a new function for
> counting the number of phandle+argument tuples in a given property. This
> is better than the existing method of parsing each phandle individually
> until parsing fails which is a horribly slow way to do the count.
>
> It also converts of_gpio_named_count() to use the new function instead
> of using the above described horrible method.
>
> This also requires the return value of of_gpio_count() &
> of_gpio_named_count() from 'unsigned int' to 'int' so that it can return
> an error code. All the users of that function are fixed up to correctly
> handle a negative return value.

One more thing: In of_spi_register_master() in drivers/spi.c the error 
code is put in the unsigned variable nb, leading to a huge nb and 
master->num_chipselect with following problems when of_gpio_named_count 
returns an error code.

Cheers,
Andreas Larsson


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of: Create function for counting number of phandles in a property
  2013-02-11 11:26 ` Andreas Larsson
@ 2013-02-12 17:25   ` Grant Likely
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2013-02-12 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Larsson
  Cc: devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring

On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:26:15 +0100, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com> wrote:
> On 2013-02-11 00:58, Grant Likely wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> > index 2390ddb..e1120a2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> > @@ -1025,12 +1025,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_parse_phandle);
> >    * To get a device_node of the `node2' node you may call this:
> >    * of_parse_phandle_with_args(node3, "list", "#list-cells", 1, &args);
> >    */
> > -int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_name,
> > -				const char *cells_name, int index,
> > -				struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
> > +static int __of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np,
> > +					const char *list_name,
> > +					const char *cells_name, int index,
> > +					struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
> >   {
> >   	const __be32 *list, *list_end;
> > -	int size, cur_index = 0;
> > +	int rc = 0, size, cur_index = 0;
> >   	uint32_t count = 0;
> >   	struct device_node *node = NULL;
> >   	phandle phandle;
> > @@ -1059,12 +1060,14 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_na
> >   			if (!node) {
> >   				pr_err("%s: could not find phandle\n",
> >   					 np->full_name);
> > +				rc = -EINVAL;
> >   				break;
> >   			}
> >   			if (of_property_read_u32(node, cells_name, &count)) {
> >   				pr_err("%s: could not get %s for %s\n",
> >   					 np->full_name, cells_name,
> >   					 node->full_name);
> > +				rc = -EINVAL;
> >   				break;
> >   			}
> >
> > @@ -1075,6 +1078,7 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_na
> >   			if (list + count > list_end) {
> >   				pr_err("%s: arguments longer than property\n",
> >   					 np->full_name);
> > +				rc = -EINVAL;
> >   				break;
> >   			}
> >   		}
> > @@ -1086,8 +1090,10 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_na
> >   		 * or return -ENOENT for an empty entry.
> >   		 */
> >   		if (cur_index == index) {
> > -			if (!phandle)
> > -				return -ENOENT;
> > +			if (!phandle) {
> > +				rc = -ENOENT;
> > +				break;
> > +			}
> >
> >   			if (out_args) {
> >   				int i;
> > @@ -1098,22 +1104,54 @@ int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_na
> >   				for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
> >   					out_args->args[i] = be32_to_cpup(list++);
> >   			}
> > -			return 0;
> > +
> > +			rc = 0;
> > +			break;
> >   		}
> >
> >   		of_node_put(node);
> >   		node = NULL;
> >   		list += count;
> >   		cur_index++;
> > +		rc = cur_index;
> >   	}
> >
> >   	/* Loop exited without finding a valid entry; return an error */
> >   	if (node)
> >   		of_node_put(node);
> > -	return -EINVAL;
> > +	return rc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_name,
> > +				const char *cells_name, int index,
> > +				struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
> > +{
> > +	return __of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list_name, cells_name, index, out_args);
> >   }
> >   EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_parse_phandle_with_args);
> 
> Will this not result in a situation where a call to 
> of_parse_phandle_with_args with an out of bounds index returns the 
> number of tuples instead of an error code and possibly some caller that 
> uses the this count as a phandle instead of handling an error?

Yes, you are right about the out of bounds index. I had meant to write
the following in __of_parse_phandle_with_args:

	return (index < 0) ? rc : -ENOENT;

Which should solve that problem.

> 
> Of course of_count_phandle_with_args can be used to make sure that no 
> such call is made in the first place, but that is another story.

Not really, the __ function still has to test for a negative index.
However, it can at least make sure the index passed is not negative so
you can't get count behaviour when calling for a parse. How about:

int of_parse_phandle_with_args(const struct device_node *np, const char *list_name,
				const char *cells_name, int index,
				struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
{
	if (index < 0)
		return -EINVAL;
	return __of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, list_name, cells_name, index, out_args);
}


> 
> Related to this is that Case 7 in of_selftest_parse_phandle_with_args 
> never gets exercised as far as I can see.

You're right. Also a bug. Fixed now.

> 
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/of_gpio.h b/include/linux/of_gpio.h
> > index c454f57..bdbe0f3 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/of_gpio.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/of_gpio.h
> > @@ -50,8 +50,28 @@ static inline struct of_mm_gpio_chip *to_of_mm_gpio_chip(struct gpio_chip *gc)
> >   extern int of_get_named_gpio_flags(struct device_node *np,
> >   		const char *list_name, int index, enum of_gpio_flags *flags);
> >
> > -extern unsigned int of_gpio_named_count(struct device_node *np,
> > -					const char* propname);
> > +/**
> > + * of_gpio_named_count - Count GPIOs for a device
> > + * @np:		device node to count GPIOs for
> > + * @propname:	property name containing gpio specifier(s)
> > + *
> > + * The function returns the count of GPIOs specified for a node.
> > + *
> > + * Note that the empty GPIO specifiers counts too. For example,
> > + *
> > + * gpios = <0
> > + *          &pio1 1 2
> > + *          0
> > + *          &pio2 3 4>;
> > + *
> > + * defines four GPIOs (so this function will return 4), two of which
> > + * are not specified. Returns -EINVAL for an incorrectly formed gpios
> > + * property.
> > + */
> > +static int of_gpio_named_count(struct device_node *np, const char* propname)
> > +{
> > +	return of_count_phandle_with_args(np, propname, "#gpio-cells");
> > +}
> 
> Should this be static inline int?

Yes.

> 
> I think it would be good to also document that it also returns -ENOENT 
> when the propname property is missing, which might be an important case 
> to distinguish from the -EINVAL case.

Done. I'll post a new version shortly.

g.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] of: Create function for counting number of phandles in a property
  2013-02-12  9:18 ` Andreas Larsson
@ 2013-02-12 17:28   ` Grant Likely
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2013-02-12 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andreas Larsson
  Cc: devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel, Linus Walleij, Rob Herring

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:18:10 +0100, Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com> wrote:
> On 2013-02-11 00:58, Grant Likely wrote:
> > This patch creates of_count_phandle_with_args(), a new function for
> > counting the number of phandle+argument tuples in a given property. This
> > is better than the existing method of parsing each phandle individually
> > until parsing fails which is a horribly slow way to do the count.
> >
> > It also converts of_gpio_named_count() to use the new function instead
> > of using the above described horrible method.
> >
> > This also requires the return value of of_gpio_count() &
> > of_gpio_named_count() from 'unsigned int' to 'int' so that it can return
> > an error code. All the users of that function are fixed up to correctly
> > handle a negative return value.
> 
> One more thing: In of_spi_register_master() in drivers/spi.c the error 
> code is put in the unsigned variable nb, leading to a huge nb and 
> master->num_chipselect with following problems when of_gpio_named_count 
> returns an error code.

Also a good catch. Fixed.

g.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-12 18:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-10 23:58 [PATCH] of: Create function for counting number of phandles in a property Grant Likely
2013-02-11 11:26 ` Andreas Larsson
2013-02-12 17:25   ` Grant Likely
2013-02-12  9:18 ` Andreas Larsson
2013-02-12 17:28   ` Grant Likely

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).