From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
"linux-man@vger.kernel.org" <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: futex(2) man page update help request
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 23:12:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <537430B5.2060001@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1405150121230.6261@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
On 05/14/2014 07:34 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2014, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
>> On 05/14/2014 03:03 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>>>> However, unless I'm sorely mistaken, the larger problem is that glibc
>>>> removed the futex() call entirely, so these man pages don't describe
>>>
>>> I don't think futex() ever was in glibc--that's by design, and
>>> completely understandable: no user-space application would want to
>>> directly use futex(). (BTW, I mispoke in my earlier mail when I said I
>>> wanted documentation suitable for "writers of library functions" -- I
>>> meant suitable for "writers of *C library*".)
>>
>> I fully agree with Michael here.
>>
>> The futex() syscall was never exposed to userspace specifically because
>> it was an interface we did not want to support forever with a stable ABI.
>> The futex() syscall is an implementation detail that is shared between
>> the kernel and the writers of core runtimes for Linux.
>
> Nonsense.
What is nonsense?
I do not want to be responsible for the futex API by having glibc provide
wrappers. That can't be nonsense since it's a glibc community decision to
make.
Perhaps the point at which we disagree is that I said "writers of core runtimes"
and you would rather I have said "any application wishing to use raw syscalls."
That's fine, I concede that point, I have no right to restrict raw syscall
usage.
> If we change that interface (aside of adding functionality or some new
> error return) it would break the world and some more, simply because
> out of the blue glibc-2.xx would stop to work on linux-3.yy.
No disagreement from me.
> Aside of that the futex syscall is used as a bare interface without
> any glibc interaction:
>
> - It's handy to implement user space wait queues
>
> - It's (ab)used in very interesting ways by data base apps
>
> - It's (ab)used by some Java monstrosities.
>
> Nothing you care about and you really don't want to see the gory
> details, but you have to accept that there is an universe which is
> happy to deal with the raw syscalls instead of going through some ill
> defined posix interfaces.
Sure :-)
Cheers,
Carlos.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-15 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-14 10:35 futex(2) man page update help request Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-14 16:18 ` Darren Hart
2014-05-14 19:03 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-14 19:59 ` Darren Hart
2014-05-14 20:23 ` Carlos O'Donell
2014-05-14 20:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-14 23:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-15 3:12 ` Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2014-05-15 4:49 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-15 4:53 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-15 14:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2014-05-15 20:19 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-08-04 14:46 ` Carlos O'Donell
2014-05-15 20:35 ` Darren Hart
2015-01-15 15:12 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-17 1:33 ` Darren Hart
2015-01-17 9:16 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-17 19:26 ` Darren Hart
2015-01-18 10:18 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-15 15:10 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-15 22:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-16 15:17 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-16 15:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-16 20:54 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-17 0:46 ` Darren Hart
2015-01-19 10:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-19 14:07 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-01-23 18:19 ` Torvald Riegel
2015-01-24 10:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-24 12:58 ` Torvald Riegel
2015-01-24 16:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-17 0:56 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2015-01-17 1:11 ` Darren Hart
2015-01-23 18:29 ` Torvald Riegel
2015-01-24 11:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-24 13:12 ` Torvald Riegel
2015-01-27 7:48 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2015-02-05 19:57 ` Darren Hart
2014-05-15 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-15 15:43 ` Darren Hart
2014-05-15 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-15 13:18 ` Carlos O'Donell
2014-05-15 13:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-15 13:49 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-15 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-15 14:39 ` Carlos O'Donell
2014-05-15 15:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-14 20:56 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-14 21:03 ` Darren Hart
2014-05-14 22:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-05-15 0:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-15 0:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-05-15 0:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-15 19:10 ` Carlos O'Donell
2014-05-14 21:05 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-05-15 15:15 ` Joseph S. Myers
2014-05-15 0:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-15 5:21 ` Darren Hart
2014-05-15 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-15 13:46 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-05-15 14:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-15 15:42 ` chrubis
2014-05-15 15:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-15 16:01 ` chrubis
2014-05-15 16:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-15 16:17 ` chrubis
2014-05-15 16:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-05-15 17:06 ` chrubis
2014-05-15 15:47 ` Darren Hart
2014-05-15 15:35 ` chrubis
2014-05-15 15:28 ` chrubis
2014-05-15 15:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-15 16:14 ` Darren Hart
2014-05-15 16:30 ` chrubis
2014-05-15 18:17 ` Darren Hart
2014-05-15 19:05 ` chrubis
2014-05-15 19:38 ` Darren Hart
2014-08-11 10:19 ` chrubis
2014-11-26 13:41 ` Cyril Hrubis
2015-02-16 13:14 ` Cyril Hrubis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=537430B5.2060001@redhat.com \
--to=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).