Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] Per-user clock constraints

[Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>]

On 01/29/2015 03:26 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-01-27 22:59:59)
>> On 01/27/2015 01:55 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 01/23/15 03:03, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> in this v13 I have:
>>>>
>>>> * added the latest R-b tags from Stephen,
>>>>
>>>> * split some lines that went over the 80-char limit,
>>>>
>>>> * made explicit in the docs that the range limits are inclusive, and
>>>>
>>>> * removed an ifdef in clkdev.c by adding a dev_id param to __of_clk_get_by_name.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think this patch series is ready to go except for the last one? Do you
>>> plan on polishing that one some more?
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> do you plan to merge this for 3.20?
> 
> Tomeu,
> 
> Yes. I have taken patches 1-5.
> 
> I edited patch #3 to adapt clk_has_parent for struct clk_core.
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-next&id=59cf3fcf9bafe8fdb6183f13dafb81fc8213a8f9
> 
> Patch #4 need an update to convert sun6i_ahb1_clk_determine_rate to have
> min/max rates.
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-next&id=cb75a8fcd14e71c115decc416dd8d223e7c8b2e0
> 
> Can you look it over and make sure I didn't screw anything up?

Yup, they look good to me. I have also done some testing here.

Thanks,

Tomeu