From: Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
To: Boaz Harrosh <openosd@gmail.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/4] locks: Split insert/delete block functions into flock/posix parts
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 16:32:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F725A9.1050203@bmw-carit.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F71DFE.8040703@gmail.com>
On 03/04/2015 04:00 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 04:20 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On 03/03/2015 01:55 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 15:25:12 +0100
>>> Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> wrote:
>>>
> <>
>> I have fixed that stuff and now I am testing it. Though it seems
>> that there is a memory leak which can be triggered with
>>
>> while true; rm -rf /tmp/a; ./lease02 /tmp/a; done
>>
>> and this happens also without any of my patches. Still trying to
>> figure out what's happening. Hopefully I just see a ghost.
>>
>> slabtop tells me that ftrace_event_field is constantly growing:
>>
>
> check out the Kernel's leak detector it is perfect in showing you
> what was the exact call stack of the leaked memory.
Thanks for the tip. Will use it in future :)
I have done a quick bisect limit the search on fs/locks.c.
I suspect that the file_lock_context refactoring is the source of the leak.
bisect agrees with me
8634b51f6ca298fb8b07aa4847340764903533ab is the first bad commit
commit 8634b51f6ca298fb8b07aa4847340764903533ab
Author: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Date: Fri Jan 16 15:05:55 2015 -0500
locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
:040000 040000 4114db9392dc4dadb30664b71a954321e5e87bab 5b9abbaf1808a7c926c09fa2164044e0cc26fd54 M fs
:040000 040000 bd569f527a195edf673c4f7d0e80bf356c7f8d1b 6362646e04dd83efc1a9e92877900797ac879e9a M include
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-02 14:25 [RFC v2 0/4] fs/locks: Use plain percpu spinlocks instead of lglock to protect file_lock Daniel Wagner
2015-03-02 14:25 ` [RFC v2 1/4] locks: Remove unnecessary IS_POSIX test Daniel Wagner
2015-03-03 0:55 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-02 14:25 ` [RFC v2 2/4] locks: Add lockdep assertion for blocked_lock_lock Daniel Wagner
2015-03-03 0:55 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-02 14:25 ` [RFC v2 3/4] locks: Split insert/delete block functions into flock/posix parts Daniel Wagner
2015-03-03 0:55 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 14:20 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-03-04 15:00 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-04 15:32 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2015-03-04 17:59 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 19:16 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 21:01 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 21:12 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 21:13 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-03-02 14:25 ` [RFC v2 4/4] locks: Use blocked_lock_lock only to protect blocked_hash Daniel Wagner
2015-03-03 0:58 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-02 15:23 ` [RFC v2 0/4] fs/locks: Use plain percpu spinlocks instead of lglock to protect file_lock Jeff Layton
2015-03-02 16:44 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F725A9.1050203@bmw-carit.de \
--to=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=jlayton@primarydata.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=openosd@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).