From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>,
Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/4] locks: Split insert/delete block functions into flock/posix parts
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2015 22:13:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54F77581.4070300@monom.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150304160136.57a75e8e@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
On 03/04/2015 10:01 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I pulled down the most recent Fedora rawhide kernel today:
>
> 4.0.0-0.rc2.git0.1.fc23.x86_64
>
> ...and with that, I can't reproduce this. The ftrace_event_field slab
> (which is shared by the fasync_struct cache) seems to stay under
> control. I see it hover around 3-4M in size while the test is running
> but the box isn't falling over or anything.
>
> Perhaps this was an MM or RCU bug that is now fixed? Can you confirm
> whether you're still able to reproduce it with the most recent mainline
> kernels?
Sure, I'll give tomorrow a spin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-02 14:25 [RFC v2 0/4] fs/locks: Use plain percpu spinlocks instead of lglock to protect file_lock Daniel Wagner
2015-03-02 14:25 ` [RFC v2 1/4] locks: Remove unnecessary IS_POSIX test Daniel Wagner
2015-03-03 0:55 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-02 14:25 ` [RFC v2 2/4] locks: Add lockdep assertion for blocked_lock_lock Daniel Wagner
2015-03-03 0:55 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-02 14:25 ` [RFC v2 3/4] locks: Split insert/delete block functions into flock/posix parts Daniel Wagner
2015-03-03 0:55 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 14:20 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-03-04 15:00 ` Boaz Harrosh
2015-03-04 15:32 ` Daniel Wagner
2015-03-04 17:59 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 19:16 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 21:01 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 21:12 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-04 21:13 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2015-03-02 14:25 ` [RFC v2 4/4] locks: Use blocked_lock_lock only to protect blocked_hash Daniel Wagner
2015-03-03 0:58 ` Jeff Layton
2015-03-02 15:23 ` [RFC v2 0/4] fs/locks: Use plain percpu spinlocks instead of lglock to protect file_lock Jeff Layton
2015-03-02 16:44 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54F77581.4070300@monom.org \
--to=wagi@monom.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=jlayton@primarydata.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).