linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, steve.capper@linaro.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andre.przywara@arm.com,
	dave.martin@arm.com, Vladimir.Murzin@arm.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
	edward.nevill@linaro.org, aph@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/22] arm64: Delay cpu feature checks
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 12:09:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5613ABE3.6060002@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201510061230.QVbFYdKy%fengguang.wu@intel.com>

On 06/10/15 05:41, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Suzuki,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on v4.3-rc4 -- if it's inappropriate base, please ignore]
>
> config: arm64-alldefconfig (attached as .config)
> reproduce:
>          wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>          make.cross ARCH=arm64
>
> Note: the linux-review/Suzuki-K-Poulose/arm64-Consolidate-CPU-feature-handling HEAD bfdef3a10032e84cc7ae186a058443219f110679 builds fine.
>        It only hurts bisectibility.
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>     arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c: In function 'cpu_enable_features':
>>> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:733:52: error: 'const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities' has no member named 'sys_reg'
>        if(!cpus_have_cap(caps[i].capability) || !caps[i].sys_reg)
>                                                         ^
>     arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c:739:47: error: 'const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities' has no member named 'sys_reg'
>        if (!feature_matches(read_cpu_sysreg(caps[i].sys_reg), &caps[i]))
>                                                    ^

That was a mistake in rebase/reordering of patches. Have fixed it internally, will include
it in the next version

Thanks @kbuild-test-robot for the report

Suzuki


  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-06 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-05 17:01 [PATCH v2 00/22] arm64: Consolidate CPU feature handling Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] arm64: Make the CPU information more clear Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] arm64: Delay ELF HWCAP initialisation until all CPUs are up Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] arm64: Move cpu feature detection code Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] arm64: Move mixed endian support detection Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] arm64: Move /proc/cpuinfo handling code Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] arm64: sys_reg: Define System register encoding Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-07 16:36   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-07 17:03     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-08 14:43       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-08 16:13         ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-07 17:16   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-08  9:55     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-08 15:03       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-09 13:00         ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-12 17:01         ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-12 17:21           ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-13  9:40             ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-09 10:56       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-09 14:16         ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-05 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] arm64: Consolidate CPU Sanity check to CPU Feature infrastructure Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] arm64: Read system wide CPUID value Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] arm64: Cleanup mixed endian support detection Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] arm64: Populate cpuinfo after notify_cpu_starting Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-08 10:15   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-08 10:46     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-09 15:01       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] arm64: Delay cpu feature checks Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-06  4:41   ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-06 11:09     ` Suzuki K. Poulose [this message]
2015-10-08 11:08   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-13 10:12     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] arm64: Make use of system wide capability checks Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] arm64: Cleanup HWCAP handling Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-08 11:10   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-08 11:17     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-08 13:00       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-08 14:54         ` Edward Nevill
2015-10-05 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] arm64: Move FP/ASIMD hwcap handling to common code Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 16/22] arm64/debug: Make use of the system wide safe value Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-08 11:11   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-08 11:56     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-08 15:08       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-08 15:57         ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] arm64/kvm: Make use of the system wide safe values Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-10 15:17   ` Christoffer Dall
2015-10-05 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 18/22] arm64: Add helper to decode register from instruction Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] arm64: cpufeature: Track the user visible fields Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] arm64: Expose feature registers by emulating MRS Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-05 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-10-06  9:09   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-06 10:18     ` Steve Capper
2015-10-06 10:25       ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-06 10:29         ` Steve Capper
2015-10-06 19:16       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-05 17:02 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] arm64: feature registers: Documentation Suzuki K. Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5613ABE3.6060002@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=Vladimir.Murzin@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=aph@redhat.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=edward.nevill@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=steve.capper@linaro.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).