From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86 topology: export die_siblings
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:56:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59e07a24-dc44-c21b-91d4-ea04e8d0653e@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d54a56186fb9be7a8f622a4625a41dc600dd7a4.1550545163.git.len.brown@intel.com>
On 2/18/2019 10:40 PM, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
>
> like core_siblings, except it shows which die are in the same package.
>
> This is needed for lscpu(1) to correctly display die topology.
>
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> ---
> Documentation/cputopology.txt | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c | 1 +
> drivers/base/topology.c | 6 ++++++
> include/linux/topology.h | 3 +++
> 7 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/cputopology.txt b/Documentation/cputopology.txt
> index 287213b4517b..7dd2ae3df233 100644
> --- a/Documentation/cputopology.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/cputopology.txt
> @@ -56,6 +56,16 @@ core_siblings_list:
> human-readable list of cpuX's hardware threads within the same
> die_id.
>
> +die_siblings:
> +
> + internal kernel map of cpuX's hardware threads within the same
> + physical_package_id.
> +
> +die_siblings_list:
> +
> + human-readable list of cpuX's hardware threads within the same
> + physical_package_id.
> +
> book_siblings:
>
> internal kernel map of cpuX's hardware threads within the same
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
> index 2e95b6c1bca3..39266d193597 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ extern unsigned int num_processors;
>
> DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_sibling_map);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_core_map);
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_die_map);
> /* cpus sharing the last level cache: */
> DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_llc_shared_map);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(u16, cpu_llc_id);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> index 281be6bbc80d..a52a572147ba 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ extern const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu);
> #define topology_core_id(cpu) (cpu_data(cpu).cpu_core_id)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> +#define topology_die_cpumask(cpu) (per_cpu(cpu_die_map, cpu))
> #define topology_core_cpumask(cpu) (per_cpu(cpu_core_map, cpu))
Could you please update the document regarding to topology_die_cpumask
and topology_core_cpumask in Documentation/x86/topology.txt
Thanks,
Kan
> #define topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu) (per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, cpu))
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index 4250a87f57db..42d37e4a1918 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -90,6 +90,10 @@ EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_sibling_map);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_core_map);
> EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_core_map);
>
> +/* representing HT and core and die siblings of each logical CPU */
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_die_map);
> +EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(cpu_die_map);
> +
> DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_llc_shared_map);
>
> /* Per CPU bogomips and other parameters */
> @@ -461,6 +465,12 @@ static bool match_llc(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
> * multicore group inside a NUMA node. If this happens, we will
> * discard the MC level of the topology later.
> */
> +static bool match_pkg(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
> +{
> + if (c->phys_proc_id == o->phys_proc_id)
> + return true;
> + return false;
> +}
> static bool match_die(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
> {
> if (c->cpu_die_id == o->cpu_die_id)
> @@ -530,6 +540,7 @@ void set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu));
> cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, topology_core_cpumask(cpu));
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, topology_die_cpumask(cpu));
> c->booted_cores = 1;
> return;
> }
> @@ -576,8 +587,12 @@ void set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
> } else if (i != cpu && !c->booted_cores)
> c->booted_cores = cpu_data(i).booted_cores;
> }
> +
> if (match_die(c, o) && !topology_same_node(c, o))
> x86_has_numa_in_package = true;
> +
> + if ((i == cpu) || (has_mp && match_pkg(c, o)))
> + link_mask(topology_die_cpumask, cpu, i);
> }
>
> threads = cpumask_weight(topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
> @@ -1173,6 +1188,7 @@ static __init void disable_smp(void)
> physid_set_mask_of_physid(0, &phys_cpu_present_map);
> cpumask_set_cpu(0, topology_sibling_cpumask(0));
> cpumask_set_cpu(0, topology_core_cpumask(0));
> + cpumask_set_cpu(0, topology_die_cpumask(0));
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1268,6 +1284,7 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> + zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_die_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_llc_shared_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> }
>
> @@ -1488,6 +1505,8 @@ static void remove_siblinginfo(int cpu)
> cpu_data(sibling).booted_cores--;
> }
>
> + for_each_cpu(sibling, topology_die_cpumask(cpu))
> + cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, topology_die_cpumask(sibling));
> for_each_cpu(sibling, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu))
> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, topology_sibling_cpumask(sibling));
> for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu))
> @@ -1495,6 +1514,7 @@ static void remove_siblinginfo(int cpu)
> cpumask_clear(cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu));
> cpumask_clear(topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
> cpumask_clear(topology_core_cpumask(cpu));
> + cpumask_clear(topology_die_cpumask(cpu));
> c->cpu_core_id = 0;
> c->booted_cores = 0;
> cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_setup_mask);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
> index 145506f9fdbe..ac13b0be8448 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c
> @@ -251,6 +251,7 @@ static void __init xen_pv_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> + zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_die_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_llc_shared_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> }
> set_cpu_sibling_map(0);
> diff --git a/drivers/base/topology.c b/drivers/base/topology.c
> index 50352cf96f85..5b1317ae3262 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/topology.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ define_siblings_show_func(core_siblings, core_cpumask);
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(core_siblings);
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(core_siblings_list);
>
> +define_siblings_show_func(die_siblings, die_cpumask);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(die_siblings);
> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(die_siblings_list);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_BOOK
> define_id_show_func(book_id);
> static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(book_id);
> @@ -81,6 +85,8 @@ static struct attribute *default_attrs[] = {
> &dev_attr_thread_siblings_list.attr,
> &dev_attr_core_siblings.attr,
> &dev_attr_core_siblings_list.attr,
> + &dev_attr_die_siblings.attr,
> + &dev_attr_die_siblings_list.attr,
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_BOOK
> &dev_attr_book_id.attr,
> &dev_attr_book_siblings.attr,
> diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
> index 5cc8595dd0e4..47a3e3c08036 100644
> --- a/include/linux/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/topology.h
> @@ -196,6 +196,9 @@ static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
> #ifndef topology_core_cpumask
> #define topology_core_cpumask(cpu) cpumask_of(cpu)
> #endif
> +#ifndef topology_die_cpumask
> +#define topology_die_cpumask(cpu) cpumask_of(cpu)
> +#endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_smt_mask(int cpu)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-19 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-19 3:40 [PATCH 0/11] multi-die/package support Len Brown
2019-02-19 3:40 ` [PATCH 01/11] x86 topology: fix doc typo Len Brown
2019-02-19 3:40 ` [PATCH 02/11] topolgy: simplify cputopology.txt formatting and wording Len Brown
[not found] ` <9108bd98-e9f4-fee3-80c7-72d540c48291@infradead.org>
2019-02-19 20:33 ` [linux-drivers-review] " Brown, Len
2019-02-19 3:40 ` [PATCH 03/11] x86 topology: Add CPUID.1F multi-die/package support Len Brown
2019-02-19 16:49 ` Liang, Kan
2019-02-19 19:27 ` Brown, Len
2019-02-20 2:59 ` Like Xu
2019-02-20 6:10 ` Len Brown
2019-02-20 10:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-20 15:08 ` Len Brown
2019-02-26 13:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-28 15:59 ` Len Brown
2019-02-28 17:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-24 10:04 ` Brice Goglin
2019-02-25 5:31 ` Like Xu
2019-02-25 8:08 ` Brown, Len
2019-02-19 3:40 ` [PATCH 04/11] cpu topology: export die_id Len Brown
2019-02-19 3:40 ` [PATCH 05/11] x86 topology: export die_siblings Len Brown
2019-02-19 16:56 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2019-02-19 18:43 ` Brown, Len
2019-02-19 19:33 ` Liang, Kan
2019-02-20 10:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-20 21:52 ` Brice Goglin
2019-02-21 7:41 ` Len Brown
2019-02-21 8:38 ` Brice Goglin
2019-02-19 3:40 ` [PATCH 06/11] x86 topology: define topology_unique_die_id() Len Brown
2019-02-19 3:40 ` [PATCH 07/11] powercap/intel_rapl: simplify rapl_find_package() Len Brown
2019-02-19 9:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-19 3:40 ` [PATCH 08/11] powercap/intel_rapl: Support multi-die/package Len Brown
2019-02-19 9:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-20 11:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-21 5:44 ` Len Brown
2019-02-26 4:41 ` Len Brown
2019-02-26 6:55 ` Zhang Rui
2019-02-19 3:40 ` [PATCH 09/11] powercap/intel_rapl: update rapl domain name and debug messages Len Brown
2019-02-19 9:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-19 3:40 ` [PATCH 10/11] thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal: Support multi-die/package Len Brown
2019-02-19 3:40 ` [PATCH 11/11] hwmon/coretemp: " Len Brown
2019-02-19 16:46 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59e07a24-dc44-c21b-91d4-ea04e8d0653e@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).