linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@suse.com>
To: "Govinda Tatti" <govinda.tatti@oracle.com>
Cc: <roger.pau@citrix.com>, <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	<boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>, "Juergen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2] Xen/pciback: Implement PCI slot or bus reset with 'do_flr' SysFS attribute
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 01:27:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A1FCF150200007800193632@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2783ea8a-3ef3-c4dd-a592-52cf8e188ad4@oracle.com>

>>> On 29.11.17 at 18:38, <govinda.tatti@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> In the case of bus or slot reset, our goal is to reset connected PCIe
>>> fabric/card/endpoint.
>>> The connected card/endpoint can be multi-function device. So, same
>>> walk-through and checking
>>> is needed irrespective of type of reset being used.
>> I don't follow: The scope of other devices/functions possibly
>> affected by a reset depends on the type of reset, doesn't it?
> For PCIe platforms, both slot and bus reset endup resetting all connected
> device/functions on thesecondary bus (behind the root-port or 
> downstream-port).

According to my understanding this contradicts the comment
ahead of pci_reset_slot(), which talks of multiple slots per bus.
In such a setup, I can't see why resetting on slot would affect
other slots on the same bus. At the same time the comment
says that the slot reset may resolve to a bus one when there's
just a single slot on the bus.

Jan

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-30  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-08 23:06 [PATCH V2] Xen/pciback: Implement PCI slot or bus reset with 'do_flr' SysFS attribute Govinda Tatti
2017-11-09  8:49 ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-29 15:37   ` [Xen-devel] " Govinda Tatti
2017-11-29 15:50     ` Jan Beulich
2017-11-29 17:38       ` Govinda Tatti
2017-11-30  8:27         ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2017-11-30 14:15           ` Govinda Tatti
2017-11-30 14:46             ` Jan Beulich
2017-12-01 16:16               ` Govinda Tatti
2017-12-04 16:16                 ` Govinda Tatti
2017-12-04 16:49                   ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5A1FCF150200007800193632@prv-mh.provo.novell.com \
    --to=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=govinda.tatti@oracle.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).