* Re: [PATCH -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings
2020-09-01 3:56 [PATCH -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings YueHaibing
@ 2020-09-01 6:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-09-01 6:58 ` Yuehaibing
2020-09-01 7:07 ` YueHaibing
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2020-09-01 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YueHaibing; +Cc: rogerq, tony, linux-omap, linux-kernel
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:56:42AM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:987:12: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_remap’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:926:20: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_get_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:919:13: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_set_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Make them as __maybe_unused to fix this.
Hi,
Do you know what configuration triggers these warnings? What has to be
disabled (e.g. CONFIG_OF)? Such information is useful in the commit
message.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings
2020-09-01 6:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2020-09-01 6:58 ` Yuehaibing
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yuehaibing @ 2020-09-01 6:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski; +Cc: rogerq, tony, linux-omap, linux-kernel
On 2020/9/1 14:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:56:42AM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
>> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:987:12: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_remap’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>> static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:926:20: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_get_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>> static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:919:13: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_set_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>> static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> Make them as __maybe_unused to fix this.
>
> Hi,
>
> Do you know what configuration triggers these warnings? What has to be
> disabled (e.g. CONFIG_OF)? Such information is useful in the commit
> message.
Yes, this is triggered by disable CONFIG_OF, I will update the commit log.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> .
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings
2020-09-01 3:56 [PATCH -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings YueHaibing
2020-09-01 6:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2020-09-01 7:07 ` YueHaibing
2020-09-01 7:11 ` Yuehaibing
2020-09-01 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 " YueHaibing
2020-09-01 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 " YueHaibing
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: YueHaibing @ 2020-09-01 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rogerq, tony, krzk; +Cc: linux-omap, linux-kernel, YueHaibing
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:987:12: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_remap’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:926:20: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_get_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:919:13: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_set_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Make them as __maybe_unused to fix this.
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
index ac0f577a51a1..24372254986e 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
@@ -916,14 +916,14 @@ static bool gpmc_cs_reserved(int cs)
return gpmc->flags & GPMC_CS_RESERVED;
}
-static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
+static void __maybe_unused gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
{
struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
gpmc->name = name;
}
-static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
+static const __maybe_unused char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
{
struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static int gpmc_cs_delete_mem(int cs)
* "base". Returns 0 on success and appropriate negative error code
* on failure.
*/
-static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
+static int __maybe_unused gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
{
int ret;
u32 old_base, size;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings
2020-09-01 7:07 ` YueHaibing
@ 2020-09-01 7:11 ` Yuehaibing
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Yuehaibing @ 2020-09-01 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rogerq, tony, krzk; +Cc: linux-omap, linux-kernel
Pls ignore this.
On 2020/9/1 15:07, YueHaibing wrote:
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:987:12: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_remap’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:926:20: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_get_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:919:13: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_set_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Make them as __maybe_unused to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> index ac0f577a51a1..24372254986e 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> @@ -916,14 +916,14 @@ static bool gpmc_cs_reserved(int cs)
> return gpmc->flags & GPMC_CS_RESERVED;
> }
>
> -static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> +static void __maybe_unused gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> {
> struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
>
> gpmc->name = name;
> }
>
> -static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> +static const __maybe_unused char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> {
> struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
>
> @@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static int gpmc_cs_delete_mem(int cs)
> * "base". Returns 0 on success and appropriate negative error code
> * on failure.
> */
> -static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> +static int __maybe_unused gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> {
> int ret;
> u32 old_base, size;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings
2020-09-01 3:56 [PATCH -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings YueHaibing
2020-09-01 6:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-09-01 7:07 ` YueHaibing
@ 2020-09-01 7:09 ` YueHaibing
2020-09-01 11:14 ` Roger Quadros
2020-09-01 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 " YueHaibing
3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: YueHaibing @ 2020-09-01 7:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rogerq, tony, krzk; +Cc: linux-omap, linux-kernel, YueHaibing
If CONFIG_OF is not set, make W=1 warns:
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:987:12: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_remap’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:926:20: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_get_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:919:13: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_set_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Make them as __maybe_unused to fix this.
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
v2: update commit log
---
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
index ac0f577a51a1..24372254986e 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
@@ -916,14 +916,14 @@ static bool gpmc_cs_reserved(int cs)
return gpmc->flags & GPMC_CS_RESERVED;
}
-static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
+static void __maybe_unused gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
{
struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
gpmc->name = name;
}
-static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
+static const __maybe_unused char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
{
struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
@@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static int gpmc_cs_delete_mem(int cs)
* "base". Returns 0 on success and appropriate negative error code
* on failure.
*/
-static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
+static int __maybe_unused gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
{
int ret;
u32 old_base, size;
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings
2020-09-01 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 " YueHaibing
@ 2020-09-01 11:14 ` Roger Quadros
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Roger Quadros @ 2020-09-01 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YueHaibing, tony, krzk; +Cc: linux-omap, linux-kernel
Hi,
On 01/09/2020 10:09, YueHaibing wrote:
> If CONFIG_OF is not set, make W=1 warns:
>
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:987:12: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_remap’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:926:20: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_get_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:919:13: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_set_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Make them as __maybe_unused to fix this.
Instead of that how about moving those 3 functions to within
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
#endif
like gpmc_probe_generic_child()
We are absolutely sure they are not required if CONFIG_OF isn't defined.
cheers,
-roger
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
> v2: update commit log
> ---
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> index ac0f577a51a1..24372254986e 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> @@ -916,14 +916,14 @@ static bool gpmc_cs_reserved(int cs)
> return gpmc->flags & GPMC_CS_RESERVED;
> }
>
> -static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> +static void __maybe_unused gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> {
> struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
>
> gpmc->name = name;
> }
>
> -static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> +static const __maybe_unused char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> {
> struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
>
> @@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ static int gpmc_cs_delete_mem(int cs)
> * "base". Returns 0 on success and appropriate negative error code
> * on failure.
> */
> -static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> +static int __maybe_unused gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> {
> int ret;
> u32 old_base, size;
>
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings
2020-09-01 3:56 [PATCH -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings YueHaibing
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-09-01 7:09 ` [PATCH v2 " YueHaibing
@ 2020-09-01 11:28 ` YueHaibing
2020-09-01 12:11 ` Roger Quadros
2020-09-02 15:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
3 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: YueHaibing @ 2020-09-01 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rogerq, tony, krzk; +Cc: linux-omap, linux-kernel, YueHaibing
If CONFIG_OF is not set, make W=1 warns:
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:987:12: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_remap’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:926:20: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_get_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:919:13: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_set_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Move them to #ifdef CONFIG_OF block to fix this.
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
---
v3: move the functions to #ifdef block
v2: update commit log
---
drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
index ac0f577a51a1..cfa730cfd145 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
@@ -916,20 +916,6 @@ static bool gpmc_cs_reserved(int cs)
return gpmc->flags & GPMC_CS_RESERVED;
}
-static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
-{
- struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
-
- gpmc->name = name;
-}
-
-static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
-{
- struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
-
- return gpmc->name;
-}
-
static unsigned long gpmc_mem_align(unsigned long size)
{
int order;
@@ -975,49 +961,6 @@ static int gpmc_cs_delete_mem(int cs)
return r;
}
-/**
- * gpmc_cs_remap - remaps a chip-select physical base address
- * @cs: chip-select to remap
- * @base: physical base address to re-map chip-select to
- *
- * Re-maps a chip-select to a new physical base address specified by
- * "base". Returns 0 on success and appropriate negative error code
- * on failure.
- */
-static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
-{
- int ret;
- u32 old_base, size;
-
- if (cs >= gpmc_cs_num) {
- pr_err("%s: requested chip-select is disabled\n", __func__);
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- /*
- * Make sure we ignore any device offsets from the GPMC partition
- * allocated for the chip select and that the new base confirms
- * to the GPMC 16MB minimum granularity.
- */
- base &= ~(SZ_16M - 1);
-
- gpmc_cs_get_memconf(cs, &old_base, &size);
- if (base == old_base)
- return 0;
-
- ret = gpmc_cs_delete_mem(cs);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
-
- ret = gpmc_cs_insert_mem(cs, base, size);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
-
- ret = gpmc_cs_set_memconf(cs, base, size);
-
- return ret;
-}
-
int gpmc_cs_request(int cs, unsigned long size, unsigned long *base)
{
struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
@@ -1941,6 +1884,63 @@ static const struct of_device_id gpmc_dt_ids[] = {
{ }
};
+static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
+{
+ struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
+
+ gpmc->name = name;
+}
+
+static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
+{
+ struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
+
+ return gpmc->name;
+}
+
+/**
+ * gpmc_cs_remap - remaps a chip-select physical base address
+ * @cs: chip-select to remap
+ * @base: physical base address to re-map chip-select to
+ *
+ * Re-maps a chip-select to a new physical base address specified by
+ * "base". Returns 0 on success and appropriate negative error code
+ * on failure.
+ */
+static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
+{
+ int ret;
+ u32 old_base, size;
+
+ if (cs >= gpmc_cs_num) {
+ pr_err("%s: requested chip-select is disabled\n", __func__);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure we ignore any device offsets from the GPMC partition
+ * allocated for the chip select and that the new base confirms
+ * to the GPMC 16MB minimum granularity.
+ */
+ base &= ~(SZ_16M - 1);
+
+ gpmc_cs_get_memconf(cs, &old_base, &size);
+ if (base == old_base)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = gpmc_cs_delete_mem(cs);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = gpmc_cs_insert_mem(cs, base, size);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = gpmc_cs_set_memconf(cs, base, size);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/**
* gpmc_read_settings_dt - read gpmc settings from device-tree
* @np: pointer to device-tree node for a gpmc child device
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings
2020-09-01 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 " YueHaibing
@ 2020-09-01 12:11 ` Roger Quadros
2020-09-02 15:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Roger Quadros @ 2020-09-01 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YueHaibing, tony, krzk; +Cc: linux-omap, linux-kernel
On 01/09/2020 14:28, YueHaibing wrote:
> If CONFIG_OF is not set, make W=1 warns:
>
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:987:12: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_remap’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:926:20: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_get_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:919:13: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_set_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Move them to #ifdef CONFIG_OF block to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
> ---
> v3: move the functions to #ifdef block
> v2: update commit log
> ---
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> index ac0f577a51a1..cfa730cfd145 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> @@ -916,20 +916,6 @@ static bool gpmc_cs_reserved(int cs)
> return gpmc->flags & GPMC_CS_RESERVED;
> }
>
> -static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> -{
> - struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
> -
> - gpmc->name = name;
> -}
> -
> -static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> -{
> - struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
> -
> - return gpmc->name;
> -}
> -
> static unsigned long gpmc_mem_align(unsigned long size)
> {
> int order;
> @@ -975,49 +961,6 @@ static int gpmc_cs_delete_mem(int cs)
> return r;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * gpmc_cs_remap - remaps a chip-select physical base address
> - * @cs: chip-select to remap
> - * @base: physical base address to re-map chip-select to
> - *
> - * Re-maps a chip-select to a new physical base address specified by
> - * "base". Returns 0 on success and appropriate negative error code
> - * on failure.
> - */
> -static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> -{
> - int ret;
> - u32 old_base, size;
> -
> - if (cs >= gpmc_cs_num) {
> - pr_err("%s: requested chip-select is disabled\n", __func__);
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Make sure we ignore any device offsets from the GPMC partition
> - * allocated for the chip select and that the new base confirms
> - * to the GPMC 16MB minimum granularity.
> - */
> - base &= ~(SZ_16M - 1);
> -
> - gpmc_cs_get_memconf(cs, &old_base, &size);
> - if (base == old_base)
> - return 0;
> -
> - ret = gpmc_cs_delete_mem(cs);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> -
> - ret = gpmc_cs_insert_mem(cs, base, size);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> -
> - ret = gpmc_cs_set_memconf(cs, base, size);
> -
> - return ret;
> -}
> -
> int gpmc_cs_request(int cs, unsigned long size, unsigned long *base)
> {
> struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
> @@ -1941,6 +1884,63 @@ static const struct of_device_id gpmc_dt_ids[] = {
> { }
> };
>
> +static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> +{
> + struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
> +
> + gpmc->name = name;
> +}
> +
> +static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> +{
> + struct gpmc_cs_data *gpmc = &gpmc_cs[cs];
> +
> + return gpmc->name;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * gpmc_cs_remap - remaps a chip-select physical base address
> + * @cs: chip-select to remap
> + * @base: physical base address to re-map chip-select to
> + *
> + * Re-maps a chip-select to a new physical base address specified by
> + * "base". Returns 0 on success and appropriate negative error code
> + * on failure.
> + */
> +static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + u32 old_base, size;
> +
> + if (cs >= gpmc_cs_num) {
> + pr_err("%s: requested chip-select is disabled\n", __func__);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Make sure we ignore any device offsets from the GPMC partition
> + * allocated for the chip select and that the new base confirms
> + * to the GPMC 16MB minimum granularity.
> + */
> + base &= ~(SZ_16M - 1);
> +
> + gpmc_cs_get_memconf(cs, &old_base, &size);
> + if (base == old_base)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = gpmc_cs_delete_mem(cs);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = gpmc_cs_insert_mem(cs, base, size);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = gpmc_cs_set_memconf(cs, base, size);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * gpmc_read_settings_dt - read gpmc settings from device-tree
> * @np: pointer to device-tree node for a gpmc child device
>
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 -next] memory: omap-gpmc: Fix -Wunused-function warnings
2020-09-01 11:28 ` [PATCH v3 " YueHaibing
2020-09-01 12:11 ` Roger Quadros
@ 2020-09-02 15:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2020-09-02 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: YueHaibing; +Cc: rogerq, tony, linux-omap, linux-kernel
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:28:32PM +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> If CONFIG_OF is not set, make W=1 warns:
>
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:987:12: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_remap’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static int gpmc_cs_remap(int cs, u32 base)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:926:20: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_get_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static const char *gpmc_cs_get_name(int cs)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c:919:13: warning: ‘gpmc_cs_set_name’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> static void gpmc_cs_set_name(int cs, const char *name)
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Move them to #ifdef CONFIG_OF block to fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
> ---
> v3: move the functions to #ifdef block
> v2: update commit log
> ---
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
Thanks, applied.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread