linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Kogan <alex.kogan@oracle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, mingo@redhat.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	arnd@arndb.de, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	bp@alien8.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
	Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
	Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	dave.dice@oracle.com, Rahul Yadav <rahul.x.yadav@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 11:21:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6426D627-77EE-471C-B02A-A85271B666E9@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190605204003.GC3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

>> Also, the paravirt code is under arch/x86, while CNA is generic (not
>> x86-specific).  Do you still want to see CNA-related patching residing
>> under arch/x86?
>> 
>> We still need a config option (something like NUMA_AWARE_SPINLOCKS) to
>> enable CNA patching under this config only, correct?
> 
> There is the static_call() stuff that could be generic; I posted a new
> version of that today (x86 only for now, but IIRC there's arm64 patches
> for that around somewhere too).

The static_call technique appears as the more desirable long-term approach, but I think it would be prudent to keep the patches decoupled for now so we can move forward with less entanglements.
So unless anyone objects, we will work on plugging into the existing patching for pv.
And we will keep that code under arch/x86, but will be open for any suggestion to move it elsewhere.

Thanks!
— Alex


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-06 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-29 15:20 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add NUMA-awareness to qspinlock Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] locking/qspinlock: Make arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended more generic Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] locking/qspinlock: Refactor the qspinlock slow path Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock Alex Kogan
2019-04-01  9:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01  9:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 15:53       ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-03 16:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01  9:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01 14:36   ` Waiman Long
2019-04-02  9:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 15:39       ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-03 15:48         ` Waiman Long
2019-04-03 16:01         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-04  5:05           ` Juergen Gross
2019-04-04  9:38             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-04 18:03               ` Waiman Long
2019-06-04 23:21           ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-05 20:40             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-06 15:21               ` Alex Kogan [this message]
2019-06-06 15:32                 ` Waiman Long
2019-06-06 15:42                   ` Waiman Long
2019-04-03 16:33       ` Waiman Long
2019-04-03 17:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 17:40           ` Waiman Long
2019-04-04  2:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2019-04-04  3:14     ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-11  4:22   ` liwei (GF)
2019-06-12  4:38     ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-12 15:05       ` Waiman Long
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce starvation avoidance into CNA Alex Kogan
2019-04-02 10:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 17:06     ` Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce the shuffle reduction optimization " Alex Kogan
2019-04-01  9:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Add NUMA-awareness to qspinlock Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 17:13   ` Alex Kogan
2019-07-03 11:58 ` Jan Glauber
2019-07-12  8:12   ` Hanjun Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6426D627-77EE-471C-B02A-A85271B666E9@oracle.com \
    --to=alex.kogan@oracle.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=dave.dice@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rahul.x.yadav@oracle.com \
    --cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).