linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Jan Glauber <jglauber@marvell.com>, Alex Kogan <alex.kogan@oracle.com>
Cc: "linux@armlinux.org.uk" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"longman@redhat.com" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"steven.sistare@oracle.com" <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
	"daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com" <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	"dave.dice@oracle.com" <dave.dice@oracle.com>,
	"rahul.x.yadav@oracle.com" <rahul.x.yadav@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add NUMA-awareness to qspinlock
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:12:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <95683b80-f694-cf34-73fc-e6ec05462ee0@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEiAFz238Ywgn6iDAz9gM_3PgPhs-YuAVDptehUBv7MRRPx8Cw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2019/7/3 19:58, Jan Glauber wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> I've tried this series on arm64 (ThunderX2 with up to SMT=4  and 224 CPUs)
> with the borderline testcase of accessing a single file from all
> threads. With that
> testcase the qspinlock slowpath is the top spot in the kernel.
> 
> The results look really promising:
> 
> CPUs    normal    numa-qspinlocks
> ---------------------------------------------
> 56        149.41          73.90
> 224      576.95          290.31
> 
> Also frontend-stalls are reduced to 50% and interconnect traffic is
> greatly reduced.
> Tested-by: Jan Glauber <jglauber@marvell.com>

Tested this patchset on Kunpeng920 ARM64 server (96 cores,
4 NUMA nodes), and with the same test case from Jan, I can
see 150%+ boost! (Need to add a patch below [1].)

For the real workload such as Nginx I can see about 10%
performance improvement as well.

Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>

Please cc me for new versions and I'm willing to test it.

Thanks
Hanjun

[1]
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 657bbc5..72c1346 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -792,6 +792,20 @@ config NODES_SHIFT
          Specify the maximum number of NUMA Nodes available on the target
          system.  Increases memory reserved to accommodate various tables.

+config NUMA_AWARE_SPINLOCKS
+ bool "Numa-aware spinlocks"
+ depends on NUMA
+ default y
+ help
+   Introduce NUMA (Non Uniform Memory Access) awareness into
+   the slow path of spinlocks.
+
+   The kernel will try to keep the lock on the same node,
+   thus reducing the number of remote cache misses, while
+   trading some of the short term fairness for better performance.
+
+   Say N if you want absolute first come first serve fairness.
+
 config USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
        def_bool y
        depends on NUMA
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_cna.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_cna.h
index 2994167..be5dd44 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_cna.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_cna.h
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 #endif

 #include <linux/random.h>
-
+#include <linux/topology.h>
 /*
  * Implement a NUMA-aware version of MCS (aka CNA, or compact NUMA-aware lock).
  *
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static __always_inline void cna_init_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node, int cpuid,
                                          u32 tail)
 {
        if (decode_numa_node(node->node_and_count) == -1)
-           store_numa_node(node, numa_cpu_node(cpuid));
+         store_numa_node(node, cpu_to_node(cpuid));
        node->encoded_tail = tail;
 }


      reply	other threads:[~2019-07-12  8:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-29 15:20 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add NUMA-awareness to qspinlock Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] locking/qspinlock: Make arch_mcs_spin_unlock_contended more generic Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] locking/qspinlock: Refactor the qspinlock slow path Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce CNA into the slow path of qspinlock Alex Kogan
2019-04-01  9:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01  9:33     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 15:53       ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-03 16:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01  9:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-01 14:36   ` Waiman Long
2019-04-02  9:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 15:39       ` Alex Kogan
2019-04-03 15:48         ` Waiman Long
2019-04-03 16:01         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-04  5:05           ` Juergen Gross
2019-04-04  9:38             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-04 18:03               ` Waiman Long
2019-06-04 23:21           ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-05 20:40             ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-06 15:21               ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-06 15:32                 ` Waiman Long
2019-06-06 15:42                   ` Waiman Long
2019-04-03 16:33       ` Waiman Long
2019-04-03 17:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 17:40           ` Waiman Long
2019-04-04  2:02   ` Hanjun Guo
2019-04-04  3:14     ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-11  4:22   ` liwei (GF)
2019-06-12  4:38     ` Alex Kogan
2019-06-12 15:05       ` Waiman Long
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce starvation avoidance into CNA Alex Kogan
2019-04-02 10:37   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 17:06     ` Alex Kogan
2019-03-29 15:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] locking/qspinlock: Introduce the shuffle reduction optimization " Alex Kogan
2019-04-01  9:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Add NUMA-awareness to qspinlock Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-03 17:13   ` Alex Kogan
2019-07-03 11:58 ` Jan Glauber
2019-07-12  8:12   ` Hanjun Guo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=95683b80-f694-cf34-73fc-e6ec05462ee0@huawei.com \
    --to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.kogan@oracle.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=dave.dice@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jglauber@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rahul.x.yadav@oracle.com \
    --cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).