From: Sergey Suloev <ssuloev@orpaltech.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] spi: sun6i: restrict transfer length in PIO-mode
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 14:10:40 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67c2006b-17f2-2459-e3c9-e91e3c694d8c@orpaltech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180409105001.GC11532@sirena.org.uk>
On 04/09/2018 01:50 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 01:26:23PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
>> On 04/09/2018 12:27 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:48:23PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
>>>> On 04/06/2018 10:34 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>> According to what you said the driver must implement
>>>> "transfer_one_message" instead of "transfer_one"
>>> I'm not sure what makes you think that I said that.
>> Because current implementation tries to send more than FIFO-depth of data in
>> a single call to "transfer_one" which is wrong.
> No, that's absolutely not the case. All any of these functions has to
> do is transfer whatever they were asked to, how they do it is not at all
> important to the framework.
I think you don't fully understand the issue. Let's talk about sun4i
and sun6i SPI drivers separately.
sun4i
1)it is correctly declaring max_transfer_size=FIFO depth for PIO mode
but transfer_one() function doesn't follow the declaration allowing PIO
transfers longer than FIFO depth by just refilling FIFO using 3/4 FIFO
empty interrupt. I can definitely state here that long transfers WON'T
WORK on real hardware. I tested it and that's why I can say that. But as
soon as sun4i SPI driver is correctly declaring max_transfer_size then
"smart" clients will work well by limiting a single transfer size to
FIFO depth. I tested it with real hardware, again.
sun6i
2) it allows PIO transfers of any length by declaring max_transfer_size
to a huge number, i.e. you can ONLY make this driver work in PIO mode
by limiting a single transfer size to FIFO depth (64 or 128 bytes) on
client side and ignore max_transfer_size exposed by the driver. Again,
tested with real hardware.
All above doesn't work for DMA mode as there is no such limitation.
I can't clearly explain what is happening in the hardware in PIO mode
but it seems that TC interrupt doesn't arrive in time when refilling
FIFO multiple times takes place and every long transfer will end up with
a timeout error.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-09 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-03 15:44 [PATCH v3 0/6] spi: Add support for DMA transfers in sun6i SPI driver Sergey Suloev
2018-04-03 15:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] spi: sun6i: coding style/readability improvements Sergey Suloev
2018-04-04 6:45 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-03 15:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] spi: sun6i: handle chip select polarity flag Sergey Suloev
2018-04-03 15:44 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] spi: sun6i: restrict transfer length in PIO-mode Sergey Suloev
2018-04-04 6:50 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-04 11:35 ` Sergey Suloev
2018-04-05 9:19 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-05 9:59 ` Sergey Suloev
2018-04-05 13:17 ` Mark Brown
2018-04-05 13:44 ` Sergey Suloev
2018-04-06 7:34 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-06 15:48 ` Sergey Suloev
2018-04-09 9:27 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-09 10:26 ` Sergey Suloev
2018-04-09 10:50 ` Mark Brown
2018-04-09 11:10 ` Sergey Suloev [this message]
2018-04-09 11:27 ` Mark Brown
2018-04-09 11:36 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-09 11:59 ` Sergey Suloev
2018-04-10 14:05 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-06 15:54 ` Sergey Suloev
2018-04-05 10:07 ` Mark Brown
2018-04-03 15:44 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] spi: sun6i: use completion provided by SPI core Sergey Suloev
2018-04-04 6:53 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-03 15:44 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] spi: sun6i: introduce register set/unset helpers Sergey Suloev
2018-04-04 1:32 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-04 7:02 ` Maxime Ripard
2018-04-03 15:44 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] spi: sun6i: add DMA transfers support Sergey Suloev
2018-04-04 7:00 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67c2006b-17f2-2459-e3c9-e91e3c694d8c@orpaltech.com \
--to=ssuloev@orpaltech.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).