From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org> To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 11:23:24 +1000 (AEST) [thread overview] Message-ID: <689cf6b8-e8fc-dc35-9d47-2c3d3e6aafb1@linux-m68k.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YQAbTazP4/JB8Aas@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk> On Tue, 27 Jul 2021, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 08:21:52PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Jul 2021, Al Viro wrote: > > > > > > > > The series is on top of 5.14-rc1; it lives in > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git #untested.m68k > > > Individual patches in followups... > > > > > > _Very_ lightly tested on aranym; no real hardware to test it on. > > > Any help with review and testing would be very welcome. > > > > > > > I can test this branch on a Motorola 68040 machine I have here. Can you > > advise how to get decent code coverage? Maybe there's a package out there > > with a signal-heavy test suite? Maybe I need a break point in a signal > > handler? Or perhaps just send ^C to a process running under strace? > > Generally, SIGINT is not the best insertion vector... > True. I see that 'man 7 signal' says that SIGQUIT will produce a coredump. Would that contain anything of interest? > Set a handler of e.g. SIGALRM with sigaction(), with a couple of other signals > in sa_mask (e.g. SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2). With raise() on those inside the > SIGALRM handler - then they will become deliverable on return from handler. > And have SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 handlers print siginfo and ucontext contents > (have them set with SA_SIGINFO in sa_flags, look at the second and third > arguments of sighandler). > > Use alarm(2) to arrange for SIGALRM and sit in a tight loop - that'll give you > delivery on return from interrupt. Alternatively, raise(SIGALRM) will give > you delivery on return from trap. And making that a SIGBUS handler instead, > mmapping a file, truncating it to 0 and dereferencing something in mmapped > area will give you delivery on return from access error trap. Division by > zero (and insertion handler on SIGFPE) ought to give you a type 2 exception > stack frame (4 bytes of aux data, that makes shifted exception frame bugger > format and vector fields of the original). > > FWIW, the third argument of handler points to > struct ucontext { > unsigned long uc_flags; > struct ucontext *uc_link; > stack_t uc_stack; > struct mcontext uc_mcontext; > unsigned long uc_filler[80]; > sigset_t uc_sigmask; /* mask last for extensibility */ > }; > and type/vector is stored in uc_filler[54] (216 bytes into the array), with > aux data from exception stack frame starting from uc_filler[55]. > OK, give me a week or so and I'll see what I can come up with.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-28 1:23 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-07-25 17:18 Al Viro 2021-07-25 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] m68k: handle arrivals of multiple signals correctly Al Viro 2021-09-15 22:08 ` Michael Schmitz 2021-07-25 17:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] m68k: update ->thread.esp0 before calling syscall_trace() in ret_from_signal Al Viro 2021-09-15 22:19 ` Michael Schmitz 2021-07-25 17:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] m68k: leave stack mangling to asm wrapper of sigreturn() Al Viro 2021-09-15 23:35 ` Michael Schmitz 2021-09-16 0:19 ` Al Viro 2021-09-16 0:53 ` Michael Schmitz 2021-09-16 3:21 ` Al Viro 2021-09-16 5:02 ` Michael Schmitz 2021-09-16 16:14 ` Al Viro 2021-07-27 10:21 ` [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes Finn Thain 2021-07-27 14:42 ` Al Viro 2021-07-28 1:23 ` Finn Thain [this message] 2021-08-11 1:42 ` Finn Thain 2021-09-16 9:03 ` Finn Thain 2021-09-23 14:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2021-09-23 14:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=689cf6b8-e8fc-dc35-9d47-2c3d3e6aafb1@linux-m68k.org \ --to=fthain@linux-m68k.org \ --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \ --cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \ --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \ --subject='Re: [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).