linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:45:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdU1DrwMAP4qRvK6tq5GV_c3bF5RmUR6ok2AqBXSbn7UBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YP2c1xk9LJ0zE3KW@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>

On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 7:18 PM Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>         Back in 2012 or so I'd found a bunch of fun issues with multiple
> pending signals on a lot of architectures.  m68k looked scarier than
> usual (due to the combination of variable-sized exception frames with the
> way kernel stack pointer is handled by the hardware), but I'd convinced
> myself that it had been correct.
>
>         Unfortunately, I was wrong - handling of multiple pending signals
> does *not* work correctly there.

[...]

Thank you, queuing in the m68k branch as fixes.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-23 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-25 17:18 Al Viro
2021-07-25 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] m68k: handle arrivals of multiple signals correctly Al Viro
2021-09-15 22:08   ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-25 17:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] m68k: update ->thread.esp0 before calling syscall_trace() in ret_from_signal Al Viro
2021-09-15 22:19   ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-25 17:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] m68k: leave stack mangling to asm wrapper of sigreturn() Al Viro
2021-09-15 23:35   ` Michael Schmitz
2021-09-16  0:19     ` Al Viro
2021-09-16  0:53       ` Michael Schmitz
2021-09-16  3:21         ` Al Viro
2021-09-16  5:02           ` Michael Schmitz
2021-09-16 16:14             ` Al Viro
2021-07-27 10:21 ` [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes Finn Thain
2021-07-27 14:42   ` Al Viro
2021-07-28  1:23     ` Finn Thain
2021-08-11  1:42     ` Finn Thain
2021-09-16  9:03 ` Finn Thain
2021-09-23 14:43   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-23 14:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMuHMdU1DrwMAP4qRvK6tq5GV_c3bF5RmUR6ok2AqBXSbn7UBg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --subject='Re: [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).