From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] m68k: leave stack mangling to asm wrapper of sigreturn()
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 16:14:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUNtUXUVK5sRL5vw@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <59a44e17-bff8-041e-b704-2b1d97601ce7@gmail.com>
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 05:02:22PM +1200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> The only question that remains is whether the third patch can also go to
> -stable. Most of my testing was with all three patches applied, I can drop
> the third one and retest if you're worries the third one is not appropriate
> for -stable.
Up to m68k folks, really. The current mainline mangle_kernel_stack()
is, er, not nice and the entire area is delicate enough as it is (witness the
bugs dealt with in the rest of the series), but strictly speaking the third
patch is not fixing any functional bugs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-16 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-25 17:18 [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes Al Viro
2021-07-25 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] m68k: handle arrivals of multiple signals correctly Al Viro
2021-09-15 22:08 ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-25 17:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] m68k: update ->thread.esp0 before calling syscall_trace() in ret_from_signal Al Viro
2021-09-15 22:19 ` Michael Schmitz
2021-07-25 17:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] m68k: leave stack mangling to asm wrapper of sigreturn() Al Viro
2021-09-15 23:35 ` Michael Schmitz
2021-09-16 0:19 ` Al Viro
2021-09-16 0:53 ` Michael Schmitz
2021-09-16 3:21 ` Al Viro
2021-09-16 5:02 ` Michael Schmitz
2021-09-16 16:14 ` Al Viro [this message]
2021-07-27 10:21 ` [RFC][CFT] signal handling fixes Finn Thain
2021-07-27 14:42 ` Al Viro
2021-07-28 1:23 ` Finn Thain
2021-08-11 1:42 ` Finn Thain
2021-09-16 9:03 ` Finn Thain
2021-09-23 14:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-09-23 14:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YUNtUXUVK5sRL5vw@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).