From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
tony.luck@intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com, james.morse@arm.com,
ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 09/13] selftests/resctrl: Modularize fill_buf for new CAT test case
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:04:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a1f93d4516a7de99c5dbc4afd6279d6fe7aa126.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4c84be1d-8839-2c85-b294-7e3c454240bb@intel.com>
Hi Reinette,
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 14:59 -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Sai,
>
> On 3/6/2020 7:40 PM, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> > Currently fill_buf (in-built benchmark) runs as a separate process and it
> > runs indefinitely looping around given buffer either reading it or writing
> > to it. But, some future test cases might want to start and stop looping
> > around the buffer as they see fit. So, modularize fill_buf to support this
> > use case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/fill_buf.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > -----
> > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/fill_buf.c
> > b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/fill_buf.c
> > index 9ede7b63f059..204ae8870a32 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/fill_buf.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/fill_buf.c
> > @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
> > #define PAGE_SIZE (4 * 1024)
> > #define MB (1024 * 1024)
> >
> > -static unsigned char *startptr;
> > +static unsigned char *startptr, *endptr;
[Snipped.. assuming code over here might not be needed for discussion]
> > +static int use_buffer_forever(int op, char *resctrl_val)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > if (op == 0)
> > - ret = fill_cache_read(start_ptr, end_ptr, resctrl_val);
> > + ret = fill_cache_read(resctrl_val);
> > else
> > - ret = fill_cache_write(start_ptr, end_ptr, resctrl_val);
> > + ret = fill_cache_write(resctrl_val);
> >
> > if (ret) {
> > printf("\n Errror in fill cache read/write...\n");
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +fill_cache(unsigned long long buf_size, int malloc_and_init, int
> > memflush,
> > + int op, char *resctrl_val)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = init_buffer(buf_size, malloc_and_init, memflush);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = use_buffer_forever(op, resctrl_val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
>
> Should buffer be freed on this error path?
Yes, that's right.. my bad. Will fix it. But the right fix is,
use_buffer_forever() should not return at all. It's meant to loop around the
buffer _forever_.
> I think the asymmetrical nature of the memory allocation and release
> creates traps like this.
>
> It may be less error prone to have the pointer returned by init_buffer
> and the acted on and released within fill_cache(), passed to
> "use_buffer_forever()" as a parameter. The buffer size is known here,
> there is no need to keep an "end pointer" around.
The main reason for having "startptr" as a global variable is to free memory
when fill_buf is killed. fill_buf runs as a separate process (for test cases
like MBM, MBA and CQM) and when user issues Ctrl_c or when the test kills
benchmark_pid (i.e. fill_buf), the buffer is freed (please see
ctrl_handler()).
So, I thought, as "startptr" is anyways global, why pass it around as an
argument? While making this change I thought it's natural to make "endptr"
global as well because the function didn't really look good to just take
endptr as an argument without startptr.
I do agree that asymmetrical nature of the memory allocation and release might
create traps, I will try to overcome this for CAT test case (other test cases
will not need it).
Regards,
Sai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-11 1:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-07 3:40 [PATCH V1 00/13] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 01/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix feature detection Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-09 21:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-09 22:22 ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-03-09 22:33 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-09 22:51 ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-03-11 18:06 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 18:22 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 18:45 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 18:54 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 02/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 03/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo in help text Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 04/13] selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 05/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix missing options "-n" and "-p" Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 06/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 07/13] selftests/resctrl: Don't use variable argument list for setup function Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 08/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix typos Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 09/13] selftests/resctrl: Modularize fill_buf for new CAT test case Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-10 21:59 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 1:04 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya [this message]
2020-03-11 15:44 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 17:45 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 18:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 18:14 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 10/13] selftests/resctrl: Change Cache Allocation Technology (CAT) test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-10 22:14 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 1:59 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 17:03 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 19:14 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 20:22 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 20:55 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 11/13] selftests/resctrl: Change Cache Quality Monitoring (CQM) test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-10 22:18 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 2:46 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 17:19 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 17:33 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 18:03 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 18:07 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 12/13] selftests/resctrl: Dynamically select buffer size for CAT test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-10 22:19 ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 2:52 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07 3:40 ` [PATCH V1 13/13] selftests/resctrl: Cleanup fill_buff after changing " Sai Praneeth Prakhya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a1f93d4516a7de99c5dbc4afd6279d6fe7aa126.camel@intel.com \
--to=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).