linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
To: shuah@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	tony.luck@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
	babu.moger@amd.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V1 01/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix feature detection
Date: Fri,  6 Mar 2020 19:40:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e3e4b91f5786a489e68eecda21e1d8049b60181.1583657204.git.sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1583657204.git.sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>

From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>

The intention of the resctrl selftests is to only run the tests
associated with the feature(s) supported by the platform. Through
parsing of the feature flags found in /proc/cpuinfo it is possible
to learn which features are supported by the plaform.

There are currently two issues with the platform feature detection that
together result in tests always being run, whether the platform supports
a feature or not. First, the parsing of the the feature flags loads the
line containing the flags in a buffer that is too small (256 bytes) to
always contain all flags. The consequence is that the flags of the features
being tested for may not be present in the buffer. Second, the actual
test for presence of a feature has an error in the logic, negating the
test for a particular feature flag instead of testing for the presence of a
particular feature flag.

These two issues combined results in all tests being run on all
platforms, whether the feature is supported or not.

Fix these issue by (1) increasing the buffer size being used to parse
the feature flags, and (2) change the logic to test for presence of the
feature being tested for.

Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
index 19c0ec4045a4..226dd7fdcfb1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrlfs.c
@@ -596,11 +596,11 @@ bool check_resctrlfs_support(void)
 
 char *fgrep(FILE *inf, const char *str)
 {
-	char line[256];
 	int slen = strlen(str);
+	char line[2048];
 
 	while (!feof(inf)) {
-		if (!fgets(line, 256, inf))
+		if (!fgets(line, 2048, inf))
 			break;
 		if (strncmp(line, str, slen))
 			continue;
@@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ bool validate_resctrl_feature_request(char *resctrl_val)
 	if (res) {
 		char *s = strchr(res, ':');
 
-		found = s && !strstr(s, resctrl_val);
+		found = s && strstr(s, resctrl_val);
 		free(res);
 	}
 	fclose(inf);
-- 
2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-07  3:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-07  3:40 [PATCH V1 00/13] Miscellaneous fixes for resctrl selftests Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya [this message]
2020-03-09 21:44   ` [PATCH V1 01/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix feature detection Reinette Chatre
2020-03-09 22:22     ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-03-09 22:33       ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-09 22:51         ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2020-03-11 18:06           ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 18:22             ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 18:45               ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 18:54                 ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 02/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 03/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix typo in help text Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 04/13] selftests/resctrl: Ensure sibling CPU is not same as original CPU Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 05/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix missing options "-n" and "-p" Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 06/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix MBA/MBM results reporting format Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 07/13] selftests/resctrl: Don't use variable argument list for setup function Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 08/13] selftests/resctrl: Fix typos Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 09/13] selftests/resctrl: Modularize fill_buf for new CAT test case Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-10 21:59   ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11  1:04     ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 15:44       ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 17:45         ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 18:10           ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 18:14             ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 10/13] selftests/resctrl: Change Cache Allocation Technology (CAT) test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-10 22:14   ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11  1:59     ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 17:03       ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 19:14         ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 20:22           ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 20:55             ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 11/13] selftests/resctrl: Change Cache Quality Monitoring (CQM) test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-10 22:18   ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11  2:46     ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 17:19       ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 17:33         ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-11 18:03           ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11 18:07             ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 12/13] selftests/resctrl: Dynamically select buffer size for CAT test Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-10 22:19   ` Reinette Chatre
2020-03-11  2:52     ` Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2020-03-07  3:40 ` [PATCH V1 13/13] selftests/resctrl: Cleanup fill_buff after changing " Sai Praneeth Prakhya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7e3e4b91f5786a489e68eecda21e1d8049b60181.1583657204.git.sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
    --to=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).