linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>,
	tony.luck@intel.com, naoya.horiguchi@nec.com
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, justin.he@arm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org, ashish.kalra@amd.com,
	baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, bp@alien8.de,
	cuibixuan@linux.alibaba.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, jarkko@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	linmiaohe@huawei.com, lvying6@huawei.com, rafael@kernel.org,
	xiexiuqi@huawei.com, zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 10:21:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80aa34b5-0957-411b-e990-afc7adc6ebd8@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ec40f516-cdd4-85a6-81c2-0da27252c5ca@huawei.com>



On 2023/4/6 PM8:39, Xiaofei Tan wrote:
> Hi Shuai,
> 
> Thanks for your this effort, and it's great.
> Some comments below.
> 
> 在 2023/3/17 15:24, Shuai Xue 写道:
>> Hardware errors could be signaled by synchronous interrupt, e.g.  when an
>> error is detected by a background scrubber, or signaled by synchronous
>> exception, e.g. when an uncorrected error is consumed. Both synchronous and
>> asynchronous error are queued and handled by a dedicated kthread in
>> workqueue.
>>
>> commit 7f17b4a121d0 ("ACPI: APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for
>> synchronous errors") keep track of whether memory_failure() work was
>> queued, and make task_work pending to flush out the workqueue so that the
>> work for synchronous error is processed before returning to user-space.
>> The trick ensures that the corrupted page is unmapped and poisoned. And
>> after returning to user-space, the task starts at current instruction which
>> triggering a page fault in which kernel will send SIGBUS to current process
>> due to VM_FAULT_HWPOISON.
>>
>> However, the memory failure recovery for hwpoison-aware mechanisms does not
>> work as expected. For example, hwpoison-aware user-space processes like
>> QEMU register their customized SIGBUS handler and enable early kill mode by
>> seting PF_MCE_EARLY at initialization. Then the kernel will directy notify
>> the process by sending a SIGBUS signal in memory failure with wrong
>> si_code: the actual user-space process accessing the corrupt memory
>> location, but its memory failure work is handled in a kthread context, so
>> it will send SIGBUS with BUS_MCEERR_AO si_code to the actual user-space
>> process instead of BUS_MCEERR_AR in kill_proc().
>>
>> To this end, separate synchronous and asynchronous error handling into
>> different paths like X86 platform does:
>>
>> - task work for synchronous errors.
>> - and workqueue for asynchronous errors.
>>
>> Then for synchronous errors, the current context in memory failure is
>> exactly belongs to the task consuming poison data and it will send SIBBUS
>> with proper si_code.
>>
>> Fixes: 7f17b4a121d0 ("ACPI: APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors")
>> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>   include/acpi/ghes.h      |   3 --
>>   mm/memory-failure.c      |  13 -----
>>   3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> index cccd96596efe..1901ee3498c4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> @@ -452,45 +452,79 @@ static void ghes_clear_estatus(struct ghes *ghes,
>>   }
>>     /*
>> - * Called as task_work before returning to user-space.
>> - * Ensure any queued work has been done before we return to the context that
>> - * triggered the notification.
>> + * struct sync_task_work - for synchronous RAS event
>> + *
>> + * @twork:                callback_head for task work
>> + * @pfn:                  page frame number of corrupted page
>> + * @flags:                fine tune action taken
>> + *
>> + * Structure to pass task work to be handled before
>> + * ret_to_user via task_work_add().
>>    */
>> -static void ghes_kick_task_work(struct callback_head *head)
>> +struct sync_task_work {
>> +    struct callback_head twork;
>> +    u64 pfn;
>> +    int flags;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void memory_failure_cb(struct callback_head *twork)
>>   {
>> -    struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus;
>> -    struct ghes_estatus_node *estatus_node;
>> -    u32 node_len;
>> +    int ret;
>> +    struct sync_task_work *twcb =
>> +        container_of(twork, struct sync_task_work, twork);
>>   -    estatus_node = container_of(head, struct ghes_estatus_node, task_work);
>> -    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE))
>> -        memory_failure_queue_kick(estatus_node->task_work_cpu);
>> +    ret = memory_failure(twcb->pfn, twcb->flags);
>> +    kfree(twcb);
>>   -    estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node);
>> -    node_len = GHES_ESTATUS_NODE_LEN(cper_estatus_len(estatus));
>> -    gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, (unsigned long)estatus_node, node_len);
>> +    if (!ret)
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    /*
>> +     * -EHWPOISON from memory_failure() means that it already sent SIGBUS
>> +     * to the current process with the proper error info,
>> +     * -EOPNOTSUPP means hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event,
>> +     *
>> +     * In both cases, no further processing is required.
>> +     */
>> +    if (ret == -EHWPOISON || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
>> +        return;
>> +
>> +    pr_err("Memory error not recovered");
>> +    force_sig(SIGBUS);
>>   }
>>   -static bool ghes_do_memory_failure(u64 physical_addr, int flags)
>> +static void ghes_do_memory_failure(u64 physical_addr, int flags)
>>   {
>>       unsigned long pfn;
>> +    struct sync_task_work *twcb;
>>         if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE))
>> -        return false;
>> +        return;
>>         pfn = PHYS_PFN(physical_addr);
>>       if (!pfn_valid(pfn) && !arch_is_platform_page(physical_addr)) {
>>           pr_warn_ratelimited(FW_WARN GHES_PFX
>>           "Invalid address in generic error data: %#llx\n",
>>           physical_addr);
>> -        return false;
>> +        return;
> 
> For synchronous errors, we need send SIGBUS to the current task if not recovered,
> as the behavior of this patch  in the function memory_failure_cb().
> Such abnormal branches should also be taken as not recovered.

You are right. Thank you for pointing this out. I overlooked the abnormal
branches. To sum up, there are three cases:

- valid synchronous errors: queue a task_work to synchronously send SIGBUS
  before ret_to_user.
- valid asynchronous errors: queue a work into workqueue to asynchronously
  handle memory failure.
- abnormal branches such as invalid PA, unexpected severity, no memory
  failure config support, invalid GUID section, OOM, etc.

As you commented, abnormal branches case should also be send SIGBUS, I will
handle it in ghes_proc_in_irq() if no work (task work or workqueue work) is
queued.

Best Regards,
Shuai

> 
> 
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (flags == MF_ACTION_REQUIRED && current->mm) {
>> +        twcb = kmalloc(sizeof(*twcb), GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +        if (!twcb)
>> +            return;
> 
> It's the same here.
> 
> 
>> +
>> +        twcb->pfn = pfn;
>> +        twcb->flags = flags;
>> +        init_task_work(&twcb->twork, memory_failure_cb);
>> +        task_work_add(current, &twcb->twork, TWA_RESUME);
>> +        return;
>>       }
>>         memory_failure_queue(pfn, flags);
>> -    return true;
>>   }
>>   -static bool ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
>> +static void ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
>>                          int sev, bool sync)
>>   {
>>       int flags = -1;
>> @@ -498,7 +532,7 @@ static bool ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
>>       struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
>>         if (!(mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PA))
>> -        return false;
>> +        return;
> 
> and here.
> 
> 
>>         /* iff following two events can be handled properly by now */
>>       if (sec_sev == GHES_SEV_CORRECTED &&
>> @@ -508,16 +542,15 @@ static bool ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
>>           flags = sync ? MF_ACTION_REQUIRED : 0;
>>         if (flags != -1)
>> -        return ghes_do_memory_failure(mem_err->physical_addr, flags);
>> +        ghes_do_memory_failure(mem_err->physical_addr, flags);
>>   -    return false;
>> +    return;
>>   }
>>   -static bool ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
>> +static void ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
>>                          int sev, bool sync)
>>   {
>>       struct cper_sec_proc_arm *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
>> -    bool queued = false;
>>       int sec_sev, i;
>>       char *p;
>>       int flags = sync ? MF_ACTION_REQUIRED : 0;
>> @@ -526,7 +559,7 @@ static bool ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
>>         sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity);
>>       if (sev != GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE || sec_sev != GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE)
>> -        return false;
>> +        return;
> 
> and here.
> 
> 
>>         p = (char *)(err + 1);
>>       for (i = 0; i < err->err_info_num; i++) {
>> @@ -542,7 +575,7 @@ static bool ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
>>            * and don't filter out 'corrected' error here.
>>            */
>>           if (is_cache && has_pa) {
>> -            queued = ghes_do_memory_failure(err_info->physical_fault_addr, flags);
>> +            ghes_do_memory_failure(err_info->physical_fault_addr, flags);
>>               p += err_info->length;
>>               continue;
>>           }
>> @@ -555,8 +588,6 @@ static bool ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
>>                       error_type);
>>           p += err_info->length;
>>       }
> 
> and here, for the case that memory failure is not done, as PA is invalid.
> 
> 
>> -
>> -    return queued;
>>   }
>>     /*
>> @@ -654,7 +685,7 @@ static void ghes_defer_non_standard_event(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
>>       schedule_work(&entry->work);
>>   }
>>   -static bool ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>> +static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>>                const struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus)
>>   {
>>       int sev, sec_sev;
>> @@ -662,7 +693,6 @@ static bool ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>>       guid_t *sec_type;
>>       const guid_t *fru_id = &guid_null;
>>       char *fru_text = "";
>> -    bool queued = false;
>>       bool sync = is_hest_sync_notify(ghes);
>>         sev = ghes_severity(estatus->error_severity);
>> @@ -681,13 +711,13 @@ static bool ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>>               atomic_notifier_call_chain(&ghes_report_chain, sev, mem_err);
>>                 arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
>> -            queued = ghes_handle_memory_failure(gdata, sev, sync);
>> +            ghes_handle_memory_failure(gdata, sev, sync);
>>           }
>>           else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
>>               ghes_handle_aer(gdata);
>>           }
>>           else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_PROC_ARM)) {
>> -            queued = ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(gdata, sev, sync);
>> +            ghes_handle_arm_hw_error(gdata, sev, sync);
>>           } else {
>>               void *err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
>>   @@ -697,8 +727,6 @@ static bool ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>>                              gdata->error_data_length);
>>           }
>>       }
>> -
>> -    return queued;
>>   }
>>     static void __ghes_print_estatus(const char *pfx,
>> @@ -1000,9 +1028,7 @@ static void ghes_proc_in_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
>>       struct ghes_estatus_node *estatus_node;
>>       struct acpi_hest_generic *generic;
>>       struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus;
>> -    bool task_work_pending;
>>       u32 len, node_len;
>> -    int ret;
>>         llnode = llist_del_all(&ghes_estatus_llist);
>>       /*
>> @@ -1017,25 +1043,14 @@ static void ghes_proc_in_irq(struct irq_work *irq_work)
>>           estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node);
>>           len = cper_estatus_len(estatus);
>>           node_len = GHES_ESTATUS_NODE_LEN(len);
>> -        task_work_pending = ghes_do_proc(estatus_node->ghes, estatus);
>> +        ghes_do_proc(estatus_node->ghes, estatus);
>>           if (!ghes_estatus_cached(estatus)) {
>>               generic = estatus_node->generic;
>>               if (ghes_print_estatus(NULL, generic, estatus))
>>                   ghes_estatus_cache_add(generic, estatus);
>>           }
>> -
>> -        if (task_work_pending && current->mm) {
>> -            estatus_node->task_work.func = ghes_kick_task_work;
>> -            estatus_node->task_work_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> -            ret = task_work_add(current, &estatus_node->task_work,
>> -                        TWA_RESUME);
>> -            if (ret)
>> -                estatus_node->task_work.func = NULL;
>> -        }
>> -
>> -        if (!estatus_node->task_work.func)
>> -            gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool,
>> -                      (unsigned long)estatus_node, node_len);
>> +        gen_pool_free(ghes_estatus_pool, (unsigned long)estatus_node,
>> +                  node_len);
>>             llnode = next;
>>       }
>> @@ -1096,7 +1111,6 @@ static int ghes_in_nmi_queue_one_entry(struct ghes *ghes,
>>         estatus_node->ghes = ghes;
>>       estatus_node->generic = ghes->generic;
>> -    estatus_node->task_work.func = NULL;
>>       estatus = GHES_ESTATUS_FROM_NODE(estatus_node);
>>         if (__ghes_read_estatus(estatus, buf_paddr, fixmap_idx, len)) {
>> diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
>> index 3c8bba9f1114..e5e0c308d27f 100644
>> --- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
>> +++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
>> @@ -35,9 +35,6 @@ struct ghes_estatus_node {
>>       struct llist_node llnode;
>>       struct acpi_hest_generic *generic;
>>       struct ghes *ghes;
>> -
>> -    int task_work_cpu;
>> -    struct callback_head task_work;
>>   };
>>     struct ghes_estatus_cache {
>> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> index fae9baf3be16..6ea8c325acb3 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
>> @@ -2355,19 +2355,6 @@ static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
>>       }
>>   }
>>   -/*
>> - * Process memory_failure work queued on the specified CPU.
>> - * Used to avoid return-to-userspace racing with the memory_failure workqueue.
>> - */
>> -void memory_failure_queue_kick(int cpu)
>> -{
>> -    struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;
>> -
>> -    mf_cpu = &per_cpu(memory_failure_cpu, cpu);
>> -    cancel_work_sync(&mf_cpu->work);
>> -    memory_failure_work_func(&mf_cpu->work);
>> -}
>> -
>>   static int __init memory_failure_init(void)
>>   {
>>       struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-07  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 121+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-27  4:24 [PATCH] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on action required events Shuai Xue
2022-10-28 17:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-10-28 17:25   ` Luck, Tony
2022-11-02 11:53     ` Shuai Xue
2022-11-22 11:40       ` Shuai Xue
2022-11-02  7:07   ` Shuai Xue
2022-12-06 15:33 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2022-12-07  9:54   ` reply for " Lv Ying
2022-12-07 12:34     ` Bixuan Cui
2022-12-07 12:56     ` Shuai Xue
2022-12-07 14:04       ` Shuai Xue
2022-12-08  2:27         ` Lv Ying
2022-12-06 15:33 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2022-12-06 15:33 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ACPI: APEI: separate synchronous error handling into task work Shuai Xue
2023-02-27  5:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-03-06  0:45   ` Shuai Xue
2023-02-27  5:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-03-16  7:21   ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2023-03-16  9:57     ` Shuai Xue
2023-03-16 16:45       ` Luck, Tony
2023-03-17  1:12         ` Shuai Xue
2023-02-27  5:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-03-16  7:21   ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2023-03-16 11:10     ` Shuai Xue
2023-03-17  0:29       ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2023-03-17  1:24         ` Shuai Xue
2023-03-17  7:24 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-03-20 18:03   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-30  6:11     ` Shuai Xue
2023-03-30  9:52       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-03-21  7:17   ` mawupeng
2023-03-22  1:27     ` Shuai Xue
2023-03-17  7:24 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-03-17  7:24 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-04-06 12:39   ` Xiaofei Tan
2023-04-07  2:21     ` Shuai Xue [this message]
2023-04-08  9:13 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-04-08  9:13 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-04-08  9:13 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-04-11  1:44   ` Xiaofei Tan
2023-04-11  3:16     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-11  9:02       ` Xiaofei Tan
2023-04-11  9:48         ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-04-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-04-11 14:17   ` Kefeng Wang
2023-04-12  2:54     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-12  3:55   ` Xiaofei Tan
2023-04-13  1:42     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-04-11 14:28   ` Kefeng Wang
2023-04-12  2:58     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-12  4:05   ` Xiaofei Tan
2023-04-13  1:49     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-12 11:27 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-04-12 11:28 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-04-12 11:28 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-04-17  1:14 ` [PATCH v7 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-04-24  6:24   ` Shuai Xue
2023-05-08  1:55     ` Shuai Xue
2023-04-17  1:14 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-04-17  1:14 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-09-19  2:21 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous errors in task work with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-09-19  2:21 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-09-25 14:43   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-26  6:23     ` Shuai Xue
2023-09-19  2:21 ` [RESEND PATCH v8 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-09-25 15:00   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-09-26  6:38     ` Shuai Xue
2023-10-03  8:28   ` Naoya Horiguchi
2023-10-07  2:01     ` Shuai Xue
2023-10-07  7:28 ` [PATCH v9 0/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous errors in task work with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-11-21  1:48   ` Shuai Xue
2023-11-23 15:07   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-11-25  6:44     ` Shuai Xue
2023-11-25 12:10       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-11-26 12:25         ` Shuai Xue
2023-11-29 18:54           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-11-30  2:58             ` Shuai Xue
2023-11-30 14:40               ` Borislav Petkov
2023-11-30 17:43                 ` James Morse
2023-12-01  2:58                   ` Shuai Xue
2023-11-30 17:39             ` James Morse
2023-12-01  3:37               ` Shuai Xue
2023-10-07  7:28 ` [PATCH v9 1/2] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-11-30 17:39   ` James Morse
2023-12-01  5:22     ` Shuai Xue
2023-10-07  7:28 ` [PATCH v9 2/2] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-11-30 17:39   ` James Morse
2023-12-01  7:03     ` Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:45 ` [PATCH v10 0/4] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous errors in task work with proper si_code Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:45 ` [PATCH v10 1/4] ACPI: APEI: set memory failure flags as MF_ACTION_REQUIRED on synchronous events Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:53   ` Greg KH
2023-12-21 13:55   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2023-12-22  1:07     ` Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:45 ` [PATCH v10 2/4] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if synchronous memory error not recovered Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:54   ` Greg KH
2023-12-18  6:45 ` [PATCH v10 3/4] mm: memory-failure: move memory_failure() return value documentation to function declaration Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:54   ` Greg KH
2023-12-18  6:45 ` [PATCH v10 4/4] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work Shuai Xue
2023-12-18  6:54   ` Greg KH
2024-02-04  8:01 ` [PATCH v11 0/3] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work to send correct SIGBUS si_code Shuai Xue
2024-02-19  1:46   ` Shuai Xue
2024-02-04  8:01 ` [PATCH v11 1/3] ACPI: APEI: send SIGBUS to current task if synchronous memory error not recovered Shuai Xue
2024-02-19  9:25   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-22  2:07     ` Shuai Xue
2024-02-23  5:26       ` Dan Williams
2024-02-23 12:08         ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-23 12:17           ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-02-24  6:08             ` Shuai Xue
2024-02-26 10:29               ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-27  1:23                 ` Shuai Xue
2024-02-24 19:42             ` Dan Williams
2024-02-24 19:40     ` Dan Williams
2024-02-04  8:01 ` [PATCH v11 2/3] mm: memory-failure: move return value documentation to function declaration Shuai Xue
2024-02-26 10:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-27  1:27     ` Shuai Xue
2024-02-04  8:01 ` [PATCH v11 3/3] ACPI: APEI: handle synchronous exceptions in task work to send correct SIGBUS si_code Shuai Xue
2024-02-29  7:05   ` Shuai Xue
2024-03-08 10:18   ` Borislav Petkov
2024-03-12  6:05     ` Shuai Xue

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80aa34b5-0957-411b-e990-afc7adc6ebd8@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cuibixuan@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lvying6@huawei.com \
    --cc=naoya.horiguchi@nec.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=tanxiaofei@huawei.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhuo.song@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).