From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 00/17] perf report: Add -F option for specifying output fields (v4)
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:58:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d2g5rgbi.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140424210015.GJ8488@redhat.com> (Don Zickus's message of "Thu, 24 Apr 2014 17:00:15 -0400")
Hi Don,
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 17:00:15 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:41:39PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> Hmm.. it seems that it's exactly sorted by the data symbol addresses, so
>> I don't see any problem here. What did you expect? If you want to see
>> those symbol_daddr,pid pair to be sorted by overhead, you can use the
>> one of -F or -s option only.
>
> Good question. I guess I was hoping to see things sorted by overhead, but
> as you said removing all the -F options gives me that. I have been
> distracted with other fires this week, I lost focus at what I was trying
> to accomplish.
>
> Let me figure that out again and try to come up with a more clear email
> explaining what I was looking for (for myself at least :-) ).
>
> Sorry for the distraction.
No need to sorry and thank you for testing and feedbacks :)
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-25 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-16 3:05 [PATCHSET 00/17] perf report: Add -F option for specifying output fields (v4) Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 01/17] perf tools: Add ->cmp(), ->collapse() and ->sort() to perf_hpp_fmt Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 02/17] perf tools: Convert sort entries to hpp formats Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 03/17] perf tools: Use hpp formats to sort hist entries Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 04/17] perf tools: Support event grouping in hpp ->sort() Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 05/17] perf tools: Use hpp formats to sort final output Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 06/17] perf tools: Consolidate output field handling to hpp format routines Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 07/17] perf ui: Get rid of callback from __hpp__fmt() Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 08/17] perf tools: Allow hpp fields to be sort keys Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 09/17] perf tools: Consolidate management of default sort orders Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 10/17] perf tools: Call perf_hpp__init() before setting up GUI browsers Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 11/17] perf report: Add -F option to specify output fields Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 12/17] perf tools: Add ->sort() member to struct sort_entry Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 13/17] perf report/tui: Fix a bug when --fields/sort is given Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 14/17] perf top: Add --fields option to specify output fields Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 15/17] perf diff: Add missing setup_output_field() Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 16/17] perf tools: Skip elided sort entries Namhyung Kim
2014-04-16 3:05 ` [PATCH 17/17] perf hists: Reset width of output fields with header length Namhyung Kim
2014-04-22 21:16 ` [PATCHSET 00/17] perf report: Add -F option for specifying output fields (v4) Don Zickus
2014-04-23 6:15 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-04-23 12:58 ` Don Zickus
2014-04-24 13:41 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-04-24 21:00 ` Don Zickus
2014-04-25 7:58 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2014-04-28 19:46 ` Don Zickus
2014-04-29 1:13 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-04-29 17:27 ` Don Zickus
2014-04-29 23:38 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-04-30 13:35 ` Don Zickus
2014-05-07 3:05 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-05-07 15:22 ` Don Zickus
2014-05-09 6:11 ` Namhyung Kim
2014-05-09 13:33 ` Don Zickus
2014-05-04 17:53 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-05-07 3:09 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d2g5rgbi.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).