From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 04/15] entry: Provide generic interrupt entry/exit code
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:18:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgdaa50x.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUBQa=L_Chd=RAPDEihvUWC_9KoHG00zYsGOwiYg87naQ@mail.gmail.com>
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 4:08 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>
>> Like the syscall entry/exit code interrupt/exception entry after the real
>> low level ASM bits should not be different accross architectures.
>>
>> Provide a generic version based on the x86 code.
>
> I don't like the name. Sure, idtentry is ugly and x86-specific, but
> irq gives the wrong impression. This is an entry path suitable for
> any entry that is guaranteed not to hit during entry/exit handling.
> Syscalls, page faults, etc are not "irqs".
Yeah, it's exceptions and interrupts, but I did not come up with a
better name so far.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-29 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-21 10:57 [patch V4 00/15] entry, x86, kvm: Generic entry/exit functionality for host and guest Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 01/15] seccomp: Provide stub for __secure_computing() Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 21:21 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 02/15] entry: Provide generic syscall entry functionality Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 21:38 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-22 7:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-22 7:54 ` peterz
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 03/15] entry: Provide generic syscall exit function Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-27 22:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 04/15] entry: Provide generic interrupt entry/exit code Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-27 22:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-29 12:18 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 05/15] entry: Provide infrastructure for work before exiting to guest mode Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 06/15] x86/entry: Consolidate check_user_regs() Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-27 22:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 07/15] x86/entry: Consolidate 32/64 bit syscall entry Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 08/15] x86/entry: Move user return notifier out of loop Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 09/15] x86/ptrace: Provide pt_regs helper for entry/exit Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 10/15] x86/entry: Use generic syscall entry function Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 21:47 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-22 18:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 11/15] x86/entry: Use generic syscall exit functionality Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 21:47 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 12/15] x86/entry: Cleanup idtentry_entry/exit_user Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 21:48 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 13/15] x86/entry: Use generic interrupt entry/exit code Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 14/15] x86/entry: Cleanup idtentry_enter/exit Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 21:48 ` Kees Cook
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 15/15] x86/kvm: Use generic exit to guest work function Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 20:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-22 7:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sgdaa50x.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=keno@juliacomputing.com \
--cc=krisman@collabora.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).