linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [patch V4 10/15] x86/entry: Use generic syscall entry function
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 20:25:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wo2vz9sc.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202007211440.BEF76E2@keescook>

Kees,

Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:57:16PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> This doesn't look very expensive, and they certain indicate really bad
> conditions. Does this need to be behind a CONFIG? (Whatever the answer,
> we can probably make those changes in a later series -- some of these
> also look not arch-specific...)

The most expensive part is native_save_flags(). The extra branches could
be visible in benchmarks, but its a good question whether this should be
just enabled.

I just keep it as is for now as I would need to make the flags and the
on_thread_stack() part x86 specific anyway, but yes we can revisit that
once we agreed on the general direction of this.

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-22 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-21 10:57 [patch V4 00/15] entry, x86, kvm: Generic entry/exit functionality for host and guest Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 01/15] seccomp: Provide stub for __secure_computing() Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 21:21   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 02/15] entry: Provide generic syscall entry functionality Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 21:38   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-22  7:34     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-22  7:54     ` peterz
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 03/15] entry: Provide generic syscall exit function Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-27 22:37   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 04/15] entry: Provide generic interrupt entry/exit code Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-27 22:39   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-29 12:18     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 05/15] entry: Provide infrastructure for work before exiting to guest mode Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 06/15] x86/entry: Consolidate check_user_regs() Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-27 22:39   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 07/15] x86/entry: Consolidate 32/64 bit syscall entry Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 08/15] x86/entry: Move user return notifier out of loop Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 09/15] x86/ptrace: Provide pt_regs helper for entry/exit Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 10/15] x86/entry: Use generic syscall entry function Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 21:47   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-22 18:25     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 11/15] x86/entry: Use generic syscall exit functionality Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 21:47   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 12/15] x86/entry: Cleanup idtentry_entry/exit_user Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 21:48   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 13/15] x86/entry: Use generic interrupt entry/exit code Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 14/15] x86/entry: Cleanup idtentry_enter/exit Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 21:48   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-21 10:57 ` [patch V4 15/15] x86/kvm: Use generic exit to guest work function Thomas Gleixner
2020-07-21 20:27   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-07-22  7:40     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wo2vz9sc.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=keno@juliacomputing.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).