From: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: azat@libevent.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/13] epoll: introduce helpers for adding/removing events to uring
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2019 12:02:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <904d7aea51552c9be9afb3b19bfac66b@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190603090906.GE3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2019-06-03 11:09, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 08:58:19PM +0200, Roman Penyaev wrote:
>> On 2019-05-31 18:51, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> > But like you show, it can be done. It also makes the thing wait-free, as
>> > opposed to merely lockless.
>>
>> You think it's better? I did not like this variant from the very
>> beginning because of the unnecessary complexity. But maybe you're
>> right. No busy loops on user side makes it wait-free. And also
>> I can avoid c11 in kernel using cmpxchg along with atomic_t.
>
> Imagine the (v)CPU going for an extended nap right between publishing
> the
> new tail and writing the !0 entry. Then your userspace is stuck burning
> cycles without getting anything useful done.
Yes, that is absolutely not nice. That also worries me. I wanted
to minimize number of atomic ops on hot path, and of course in that
respect this busy-loop is more attractive.
I will polish and switch back to the wait-free variant and resend the
whole patchset. Could you please take a look? Will add you to CC.
--
Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-03 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-16 8:57 [PATCH v3 00/13] epoll: support pollable epoll from userspace Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 8:57 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] epoll: move private helpers from a header to the source Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 8:57 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] epoll: introduce user structures for polling from userspace Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] epoll: allocate user header and user events ring " Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] epoll: some sanity flags checks for epoll syscalls " Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] epoll: offload polling to a work in case of epfd polled " Roman Penyaev
2019-05-21 7:51 ` Eric Wong
2019-05-22 12:54 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] epoll: introduce helpers for adding/removing events to uring Roman Penyaev
2019-05-31 9:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 11:24 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-31 13:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 11:15 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-31 12:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 14:28 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-31 16:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 12:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 14:21 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-31 16:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 18:58 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-06-03 9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-06-03 10:02 ` Roman Penyaev [this message]
2019-05-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] epoll: call ep_add_event_to_uring() from ep_poll_callback() Roman Penyaev
2019-05-31 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 11:22 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-31 13:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 15:05 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] epoll: support polling from userspace for ep_insert() Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] epoll: support polling from userspace for ep_remove() Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] epoll: support polling from userspace for ep_modify() Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] epoll: support polling from userspace for ep_poll() Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] epoll: support mapping for epfd when polled from userspace Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 8:58 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] epoll: implement epoll_create2() syscall Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 10:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-16 10:20 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-16 10:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-22 2:33 ` Andrew Morton
2019-05-22 9:11 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-22 11:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-22 18:36 ` Andrew Morton
2019-05-31 9:55 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] epoll: support pollable epoll from userspace Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 14:48 ` Jens Axboe
2019-05-31 16:02 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-31 16:54 ` Jens Axboe
2019-05-31 19:45 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-31 21:09 ` Jens Axboe
2019-06-05 6:17 ` Roman Penyaev
2019-05-31 16:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-31 18:50 ` Roman Penyaev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=904d7aea51552c9be9afb3b19bfac66b@suse.de \
--to=rpenyaev@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=azat@libevent.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).