* Subject: [REVERT][v4.x.y] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl
@ 2017-02-02 17:38 Joseph Salisbury
2017-02-02 18:23 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Salisbury @ 2017-02-02 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable, LKML; +Cc: luke, jbacik, dsterba, clm, jbacik, linux-btrfs, 1619918
Hello,
Please consider reverting commit
4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release. It
was included upstream as of v4.7-rc1 This commit introduced a
regression, described in the following bug:
http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918
This new regression was discussed in the following thread:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/6/467
Sincerely,
Joseph Salisbury
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Subject: [REVERT][v4.x.y] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl
2017-02-02 17:38 Subject: [REVERT][v4.x.y] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl Joseph Salisbury
@ 2017-02-02 18:23 ` Greg KH
2017-02-02 19:58 ` [REVERT][v4.10][V2] " Joseph Salisbury
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2017-02-02 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph Salisbury
Cc: stable, LKML, luke, jbacik, dsterba, clm, linux-btrfs, 1619918
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please consider reverting commit
> 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release.
What release can I remove it from?
It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's
reverted in Linus's tree already?
totally confused.
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl
2017-02-02 18:23 ` Greg KH
@ 2017-02-02 19:58 ` Joseph Salisbury
2017-02-02 20:57 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Salisbury @ 2017-02-02 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH, LKML, Linus Torvalds
Cc: stable, luke, jbacik, dsterba, clm, linux-btrfs, 1619918
On 02/02/2017 01:23 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Please consider reverting commit
>> 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release.
> What release can I remove it from?
>
> It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's
> reverted in Linus's tree already?
>
> totally confused.
>
> greg k-h
Sorry, commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 was introduced in
mainline in v4.7-rc1. The request should be only for kernels newer than
4.7-rc1, so 4.9 and 4.10.
I assume it will come down to 4.9 once reverted in mainline.
I updated the subject.
Thanks,
Joe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl
2017-02-02 19:58 ` [REVERT][v4.10][V2] " Joseph Salisbury
@ 2017-02-02 20:57 ` Greg KH
2017-02-02 21:01 ` Joseph Salisbury
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2017-02-02 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph Salisbury
Cc: LKML, Linus Torvalds, stable, luke, jbacik, dsterba, clm,
linux-btrfs, 1619918
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:58:16PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> On 02/02/2017 01:23 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Please consider reverting commit
> >> 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release.
> > What release can I remove it from?
> >
> > It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's
> > reverted in Linus's tree already?
> >
> > totally confused.
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Sorry, commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 was introduced in
> mainline in v4.7-rc1. The request should be only for kernels newer than
> 4.7-rc1, so 4.9 and 4.10.
>
> I assume it will come down to 4.9 once reverted in mainline.
Let me know when it is reverted, and what that revert commit is please.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl
2017-02-02 20:57 ` Greg KH
@ 2017-02-02 21:01 ` Joseph Salisbury
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Salisbury @ 2017-02-02 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH
Cc: LKML, Linus Torvalds, stable, luke, jbacik, dsterba, clm,
linux-btrfs, 1619918
On 02/02/2017 03:57 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:58:16PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>> On 02/02/2017 01:23 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Please consider reverting commit
>>>> 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release.
>>> What release can I remove it from?
>>>
>>> It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's
>>> reverted in Linus's tree already?
>>>
>>> totally confused.
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>> Sorry, commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 was introduced in
>> mainline in v4.7-rc1. The request should be only for kernels newer than
>> 4.7-rc1, so 4.9 and 4.10.
>>
>> I assume it will come down to 4.9 once reverted in mainline.
> Let me know when it is reverted, and what that revert commit is please.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Will do.
Thanks again,
Joe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-02 21:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-02 17:38 Subject: [REVERT][v4.x.y] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl Joseph Salisbury
2017-02-02 18:23 ` Greg KH
2017-02-02 19:58 ` [REVERT][v4.10][V2] " Joseph Salisbury
2017-02-02 20:57 ` Greg KH
2017-02-02 21:01 ` Joseph Salisbury
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).