* Subject: [REVERT][v4.x.y] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl
@ 2017-02-02 17:38 Joseph Salisbury
2017-02-02 18:23 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Salisbury @ 2017-02-02 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable, LKML; +Cc: luke, jbacik, dsterba, clm, jbacik, linux-btrfs, 1619918
Hello,
Please consider reverting commit
4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release. It
was included upstream as of v4.7-rc1 This commit introduced a
regression, described in the following bug:
http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1619918
This new regression was discussed in the following thread:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/1/6/467
Sincerely,
Joseph Salisbury
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: Subject: [REVERT][v4.x.y] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl 2017-02-02 17:38 Subject: [REVERT][v4.x.y] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl Joseph Salisbury @ 2017-02-02 18:23 ` Greg KH 2017-02-02 19:58 ` [REVERT][v4.10][V2] " Joseph Salisbury 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2017-02-02 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph Salisbury Cc: stable, LKML, luke, jbacik, dsterba, clm, linux-btrfs, 1619918 On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > Hello, > > Please consider reverting commit > 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release. What release can I remove it from? It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's reverted in Linus's tree already? totally confused. greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl 2017-02-02 18:23 ` Greg KH @ 2017-02-02 19:58 ` Joseph Salisbury 2017-02-02 20:57 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Joseph Salisbury @ 2017-02-02 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH, LKML, Linus Torvalds Cc: stable, luke, jbacik, dsterba, clm, linux-btrfs, 1619918 On 02/02/2017 01:23 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Please consider reverting commit >> 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release. > What release can I remove it from? > > It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's > reverted in Linus's tree already? > > totally confused. > > greg k-h Sorry, commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 was introduced in mainline in v4.7-rc1. The request should be only for kernels newer than 4.7-rc1, so 4.9 and 4.10. I assume it will come down to 4.9 once reverted in mainline. I updated the subject. Thanks, Joe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl 2017-02-02 19:58 ` [REVERT][v4.10][V2] " Joseph Salisbury @ 2017-02-02 20:57 ` Greg KH 2017-02-02 21:01 ` Joseph Salisbury 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2017-02-02 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joseph Salisbury Cc: LKML, Linus Torvalds, stable, luke, jbacik, dsterba, clm, linux-btrfs, 1619918 On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:58:16PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > On 02/02/2017 01:23 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Please consider reverting commit > >> 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release. > > What release can I remove it from? > > > > It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's > > reverted in Linus's tree already? > > > > totally confused. > > > > greg k-h > > Sorry, commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 was introduced in > mainline in v4.7-rc1. The request should be only for kernels newer than > 4.7-rc1, so 4.9 and 4.10. > > I assume it will come down to 4.9 once reverted in mainline. Let me know when it is reverted, and what that revert commit is please. thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [REVERT][v4.10][V2] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl 2017-02-02 20:57 ` Greg KH @ 2017-02-02 21:01 ` Joseph Salisbury 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Joseph Salisbury @ 2017-02-02 21:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH Cc: LKML, Linus Torvalds, stable, luke, jbacik, dsterba, clm, linux-btrfs, 1619918 On 02/02/2017 03:57 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 02:58:16PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >> On 02/02/2017 01:23 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 12:38:33PM -0500, Joseph Salisbury wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Please consider reverting commit >>>> 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 in the next v4.x.y release. >>> What release can I remove it from? >>> >>> It isn't in 4.4.y, and 4.9.y doesn't make much sense, unless it's >>> reverted in Linus's tree already? >>> >>> totally confused. >>> >>> greg k-h >> Sorry, commit 4c63c2454eff996c5e27991221106eb511f7db38 was introduced in >> mainline in v4.7-rc1. The request should be only for kernels newer than >> 4.7-rc1, so 4.9 and 4.10. >> >> I assume it will come down to 4.9 once reverted in mainline. > Let me know when it is reverted, and what that revert commit is please. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Will do. Thanks again, Joe ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-02 21:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-02 17:38 Subject: [REVERT][v4.x.y] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl Joseph Salisbury
2017-02-02 18:23 ` Greg KH
2017-02-02 19:58 ` [REVERT][v4.10][V2] " Joseph Salisbury
2017-02-02 20:57 ` Greg KH
2017-02-02 21:01 ` Joseph Salisbury
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).