linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Xu, Even" <even.xu@intel.com>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Cc: "benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com" <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
	"linux-input@vger.kernel.org" <linux-input@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to support hibernation
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:05:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9577C59DB499174B9340876B077C2E9569DF11EC@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <634cd945beca786dc77876f71e39459cef6fbd75.camel@linux.intel.com>

Ok, sure, I will update patch comments and resubmit.
Thanks Srinivas!

Best Regards,
Even Xu



-----Original Message-----
From: Srinivas Pandruvada [mailto:srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2018 11:31 PM
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>; Xu, Even <even.xu@intel.com>
Cc: benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Xu, Even <even.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to support hibernation

On Tue, 2018-06-12 at 16:53 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> 
> > From: Even Xu <even.xu@intel.com>
> > 
> > Current ish driver only register resume/suspend PM callbacks which 
> > don't support hibernation (suspend to disk). Now use the
> > SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() MACRO instead of struct dev_pm_ops directly.
> > The suspend and resume functions will now be used for both suspend 
> > to RAM and hibernation.
> > 
> > If power management is disable, SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS will do nothing, 
> > the suspend and resume related functions won't be used, so mark them 
> > as __maybe_unused to clarify that this is intended behavior, and 
> > remove #ifdefs for power management.
> 
> This describes details the patch does on code level, but what are the 
> user observable effects? Hibernation resume doesn't fail any more?
> Hibernation
> is possible (and wasn't before)? Did kernel crash while trying to 
> hibernate and this is the fix? Or ... ?
Even,
Can you add more details and resubmit ASAP?

Basically after hiberation, the ISH can't resume properly and user may not see sensor events (for example: screen rotation may not work).
User will not see a crash or panic or anything except the following message in log:
hid-sensor-hub 001F:8086:22D8.0001: timeout waiting for response from ISHTP device 

So this is adding support for S4/hiberbation to ISH.



Thanks,
Srinivas

> 
> Thanks,
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-13  0:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-11  1:56 [PATCH] hid: intel_ish-hid: ipc: register more pm callbacks to support hibernation Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-12 14:53 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-06-12 15:30   ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-13  0:05     ` Xu, Even [this message]
2018-06-13  0:14       ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2018-06-13  0:04   ` Xu, Even
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-02-11 20:11 Even Xu
2018-06-13 11:34 ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9577C59DB499174B9340876B077C2E9569DF11EC@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=even.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).