linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tilmans, Olivier (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)"  <olivier.tilmans@nokia-bell-labs.com>
To: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@fb.com>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "De Schepper,
	Koen (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" 
	<koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com>,
	"research@bobbriscoe.net" <research@bobbriscoe.net>,
	"fw@strlen.de" <fw@strlen.de>,
	"borkmann@iogearbox.net" <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
	"ycheng@google.com" <ycheng@google.com>,
	"ncardwell@google.com" <ncardwell@google.com>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"agshew@gmail.com" <agshew@gmail.com>,
	"glenn.judd@morganstanley.com" <glenn.judd@morganstanley.com>,
	"kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru" <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	"yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org" <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2] tcp: Ensure DCTCP reacts to losses
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 18:39:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM6PR07MB4821BB64AF86A1A650C95000E0500@AM6PR07MB4821.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <532BB0D8-95C8-4A4D-A73D-3B563909780F@fb.com>

> DCTCP is meant to be used in environments where the switches/routers do
> ECN marking, so it is not surprising that it performs badly when used in
> environments where it was not meant to be used. Has anyone measured the
> effect of this changed when DCTCP is used in environments where all the
> switches/routers do ECN marking? My concern is that we could end up
> hurting performance when DCTCP is used how it was meant to be used in
> order to protect incorrect uses of DCTCP.

The results reported are indeed from a non-optimal setting, and mostly to
show that it was ignoring losses. In practice, we only use DCTCP on 
ECN-enabled AQMs, and rarely see the loss reaction (e.g., a burst of new flows
IW that congest the ToR switch, in which case I'd argue the behavior is
beneficial). I cannot estimate the impact on FB's workloads though.

I had originally put a module parameter to make this loss reaction behavior
optional, mostly to enable people to check first whether it was safe to use 
with their configuration. In hindsight, I should have waited a bit more
before submitting the v2 with its removal as requested.


Olivier

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-04 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-04 12:24 [PATCH net-next v2] tcp: Ensure DCTCP reacts to losses Tilmans, Olivier (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
2019-04-04 13:17 ` Florian Westphal
2019-04-04 13:48 ` Neal Cardwell
2019-04-04 13:55   ` Neal Cardwell
2019-04-04 13:59     ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-04-04 17:52 ` David Miller
2019-04-04 18:10   ` Lawrence Brakmo
2019-04-04 18:39     ` Tilmans, Olivier (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) [this message]
2019-04-04 18:55       ` Lawrence Brakmo
2019-04-05  9:23         ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM6PR07MB4821BB64AF86A1A650C95000E0500@AM6PR07MB4821.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=olivier.tilmans@nokia-bell-labs.com \
    --cc=agshew@gmail.com \
    --cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=brakmo@fb.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=glenn.judd@morganstanley.com \
    --cc=koen.de_schepper@nokia-bell-labs.com \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=research@bobbriscoe.net \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).