From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>
To: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Discussions about the Letux Kernel
<letux-kernel@openphoenux.org>,
Andreas Kemnade <andreas@kemnade.info>
Subject: Re: [BUG] SPI broken for SPI based panel drivers
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 18:10:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BD3995F3-F4E6-4DC9-B0B9-5DCD6655F049@goldelico.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGngYiVF5yMAGPJ8xZgt=BfJ3JfBMABVC0t+dQ2oOq986T9iKg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Sven,
> Am 01.12.2020 um 17:53 schrieb Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Nikolaus,
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 11:43 AM H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com> wrote:
>>
>> You are right. It is active low.
>>
>
> In that case, we have a very simple solution, just remove the spi-cs-high,
> and things will work.
We originally had it that way and because there was a change in gpiolib we had
to introduce it.
See: f1f028ff89cb0d3
where we were forced to introduce it although I had preferred to not change DT.
I am not sure if DT maintainers accept that we revert a DT change just to
handle some change in a driver. Usually they insist on fixing a driver and
live with the DT. DT is carved in stone or could be ROM...
So you could try to submit a revert of f1f028ff89cb0d3 with a description
why it is needed. And please make sure that it is also applied where your
patch is backported to stable. So it should have some
Fixes: 766c6b63aa04 ("spi: fix client driver breakages when using GPIO descriptors")
>
> In case of SPI CS gpios, the current kernel ignores all
> GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH/LOW
> flags, and uses the presence/absence of spi-cs-high instead, to
> determine active high / active low.
So you mean you are just restoring the behaviour before
6953c57ab172
was introduced?
The alternative is that you restore the cs-gpios + spi-cs-high semantics
as defined by 6953c57ab172 and everything is fine without touching (our)
DTS (again).
BR and thanks,
Nikolaus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-01 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-30 19:03 [BUG] SPI broken for SPI based panel drivers H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-11-30 20:13 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-11-30 20:22 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 8:59 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 12:16 ` Mark Brown
2020-12-01 14:05 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 14:20 ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-01 14:34 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 14:35 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 15:52 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 16:46 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 16:10 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 16:39 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 16:53 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 17:10 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller [this message]
2020-12-01 18:43 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-02 12:19 ` Mark Brown
2020-12-04 10:08 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-04 13:46 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-04 16:49 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-04 19:19 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-04 21:31 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-05 0:25 ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-05 7:04 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-09 8:04 ` Andreas Kemnade
2020-12-09 8:40 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-09 8:38 ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-09 8:45 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 22:51 ` Linus Walleij
2020-12-01 16:44 ` [Letux-kernel] " Andreas Kemnade
2020-12-01 16:51 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 16:52 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 16:55 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 16:20 ` Mark Brown
2020-12-01 16:41 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 17:11 ` Mark Brown
2020-12-01 12:41 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 13:32 ` H. Nikolaus Schaller
2020-12-01 14:08 ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-12-01 15:33 ` Mark Brown
2020-12-05 20:57 ` Pavel Machek
2020-12-07 13:43 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BD3995F3-F4E6-4DC9-B0B9-5DCD6655F049@goldelico.com \
--to=hns@goldelico.com \
--cc=andreas@kemnade.info \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=letux-kernel@openphoenux.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thesven73@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).