linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krishna Reddy <vdumpa@nvidia.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Sachin Nikam <Snikam@nvidia.com>,
	"Thomas Zeng (SW-TEGRA)" <thomasz@nvidia.com>,
	Juha Tukkinen <jtukkinen@nvidia.com>,
	Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com>,
	Pritesh Raithatha <praithatha@nvidia.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Timo Alho <talho@nvidia.com>, Yu-Huan Hsu <YHsu@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	Alexander Van Brunt <avanbrunt@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"will.deacon@arm.com" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/7] iommu/arm-smmu: add Nvidia SMMUv2 implementation
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 01:07:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BYAPR12MB2710D40B168C7029758C5481B3B90@BYAPR12MB2710.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f2cbbe2-f6d7-07e3-3fef-18af518dedef@arm.com>

>>> +ARM_SMMU_MATCH_DATA(nvidia_smmuv2, ARM_SMMU_V2, NVIDIA_SMMUV2);
 
>> The ARM MMU-500 implementation is unmodified.  It is the way the are integrated and used together(for interleaved accesses) is different from regular ARM MMU-500.
>> I have added it to get the model number and to be able differentiate the SMMU implementation in arm-smmu-impl.c.

>In that case, I would rather keep smmu->model representing the MMU-500 microarchitecture - 
>since you'll still want to pick up errata workarounds etc. for that - and detect the Tegra integration via an explicit of_device_is_compatible()
> check in arm_smmu_impl_init().

Looks good to me. 

>For comparison, under ACPI we'd probably have to detect integration details by looking at table headers, separately
> from the IORT "Model" field, so I'd prefer if the DT vs. ACPI handling didn't diverge more than necessary.

ACPI support for T194 can be added based on need in subsequent patches. For now, I am updating it for DT support.

-KR

  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-03  1:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-29 22:47 [PATCH 0/7] Nvidia Arm SMMUv2 Implementation Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 1/7] iommu/arm-smmu: add Nvidia SMMUv2 implementation Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 15:02   ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 18:16     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-09-02 13:39       ` Robin Murphy
2019-09-03  1:07         ` Krishna Reddy [this message]
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add binding for nvidia,smmu-v2 Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 12:07   ` Mikko Perttunen
2019-08-30 15:13   ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 18:12     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-09-02  7:38       ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Add tlb_sync implementation hook Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 11:14   ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-30 19:00     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 15:23   ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 18:05     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 22:49       ` Krishna Reddy
2019-09-02 13:00         ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] iommu/arm-smmu: Add global/context fault implementation hooks Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 11:17   ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-30 19:16     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 15:43   ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 17:43     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: tegra: Add Memory controller DT node on T194 Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 11:18   ` Thierry Reding
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64: tegra: Add DT node for T194 SMMU Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 12:09   ` Mikko Perttunen
2019-08-30 18:39     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 15:44   ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 17:25     ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-30 17:45       ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-30 18:35         ` Krishna Reddy
2019-08-29 22:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64: tegra: enable SMMU for SDHCI and EQOS Krishna Reddy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BYAPR12MB2710D40B168C7029758C5481B3B90@BYAPR12MB2710.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Snikam@nvidia.com \
    --cc=YHsu@nvidia.com \
    --cc=avanbrunt@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jtukkinen@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mperttunen@nvidia.com \
    --cc=praithatha@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=talho@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomasz@nvidia.com \
    --cc=treding@nvidia.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).