* How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS
@ 2013-11-28 10:53 Peng Tao
2013-11-28 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peng Tao @ 2013-11-28 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Even if I use `make allnoconfig`, CONFIG_PROC_FS is still set. So I'm
wondering how to create a config without CONFIG_PROC_FS for build
testing?
Thanks,
Tao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS
2013-11-28 10:53 How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS Peng Tao
@ 2013-11-28 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-28 15:02 ` Peng Tao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2013-11-28 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Tao; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote:
> Even if I use `make allnoconfig`, CONFIG_PROC_FS is still set. So I'm
> wondering how to create a config without CONFIG_PROC_FS for build
> testing?
It can be disabled only if CONFIG_EXPERT=y.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS
2013-11-28 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2013-11-28 15:02 ` Peng Tao
2013-11-28 17:17 ` Richard Weinberger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peng Tao @ 2013-11-28 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Even if I use `make allnoconfig`, CONFIG_PROC_FS is still set. So I'm
>> wondering how to create a config without CONFIG_PROC_FS for build
>> testing?
>
> It can be disabled only if CONFIG_EXPERT=y.
Cool. Thank you very much!
Cheers,
Tao
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
> -- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS
2013-11-28 15:02 ` Peng Tao
@ 2013-11-28 17:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-11-28 17:37 ` Peng Tao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2013-11-28 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peng Tao; +Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Even if I use `make allnoconfig`, CONFIG_PROC_FS is still set. So I'm
>>> wondering how to create a config without CONFIG_PROC_FS for build
>>> testing?
>>
>> It can be disabled only if CONFIG_EXPERT=y.
> Cool. Thank you very much!
Out of curiosity, for which use case do you need that?
Is is possible to run a sane userspace without procfs?
--
Thanks,
//richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS
2013-11-28 17:17 ` Richard Weinberger
@ 2013-11-28 17:37 ` Peng Tao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peng Tao @ 2013-11-28 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Weinberger; +Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Richard Weinberger
<richard.weinberger@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Even if I use `make allnoconfig`, CONFIG_PROC_FS is still set. So I'm
>>>> wondering how to create a config without CONFIG_PROC_FS for build
>>>> testing?
>>>
>>> It can be disabled only if CONFIG_EXPERT=y.
>> Cool. Thank you very much!
>
> Out of curiosity, for which use case do you need that?
> Is is possible to run a sane userspace without procfs?
>
To be frank, I don't know. I just got build failure reports to fix up
when CONFIG_PROC_FS is off...
Thanks,
Tao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-28 17:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-28 10:53 How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS Peng Tao
2013-11-28 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-28 15:02 ` Peng Tao
2013-11-28 17:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-11-28 17:37 ` Peng Tao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).