* How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS @ 2013-11-28 10:53 Peng Tao 2013-11-28 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Peng Tao @ 2013-11-28 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Even if I use `make allnoconfig`, CONFIG_PROC_FS is still set. So I'm wondering how to create a config without CONFIG_PROC_FS for build testing? Thanks, Tao ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS 2013-11-28 10:53 How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS Peng Tao @ 2013-11-28 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2013-11-28 15:02 ` Peng Tao 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2013-11-28 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peng Tao; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote: > Even if I use `make allnoconfig`, CONFIG_PROC_FS is still set. So I'm > wondering how to create a config without CONFIG_PROC_FS for build > testing? It can be disabled only if CONFIG_EXPERT=y. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS 2013-11-28 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2013-11-28 15:02 ` Peng Tao 2013-11-28 17:17 ` Richard Weinberger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Peng Tao @ 2013-11-28 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote: >> Even if I use `make allnoconfig`, CONFIG_PROC_FS is still set. So I'm >> wondering how to create a config without CONFIG_PROC_FS for build >> testing? > > It can be disabled only if CONFIG_EXPERT=y. Cool. Thank you very much! Cheers, Tao > > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS 2013-11-28 15:02 ` Peng Tao @ 2013-11-28 17:17 ` Richard Weinberger 2013-11-28 17:37 ` Peng Tao 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Richard Weinberger @ 2013-11-28 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peng Tao; +Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Even if I use `make allnoconfig`, CONFIG_PROC_FS is still set. So I'm >>> wondering how to create a config without CONFIG_PROC_FS for build >>> testing? >> >> It can be disabled only if CONFIG_EXPERT=y. > Cool. Thank you very much! Out of curiosity, for which use case do you need that? Is is possible to run a sane userspace without procfs? -- Thanks, //richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS 2013-11-28 17:17 ` Richard Weinberger @ 2013-11-28 17:37 ` Peng Tao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Peng Tao @ 2013-11-28 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Weinberger; +Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, Linux Kernel Mailing List On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Peng Tao <lkml.bergwolf@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Even if I use `make allnoconfig`, CONFIG_PROC_FS is still set. So I'm >>>> wondering how to create a config without CONFIG_PROC_FS for build >>>> testing? >>> >>> It can be disabled only if CONFIG_EXPERT=y. >> Cool. Thank you very much! > > Out of curiosity, for which use case do you need that? > Is is possible to run a sane userspace without procfs? > To be frank, I don't know. I just got build failure reports to fix up when CONFIG_PROC_FS is off... Thanks, Tao ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-28 17:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-11-28 10:53 How to create a config that doesn't set CONFIG_PROC_FS Peng Tao 2013-11-28 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2013-11-28 15:02 ` Peng Tao 2013-11-28 17:17 ` Richard Weinberger 2013-11-28 17:37 ` Peng Tao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).