[PATCH] clk: rockchip: Fix video codec clocks on rk3288

* [PATCH] clk: rockchip: Fix video codec clocks on rk3288
@ 2019-03-29 21:54 Douglas Anderson
  2019-03-29 23:28 ` Ezequiel Garcia
  2019-04-10 15:45 ` Doug Anderson
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Douglas Anderson @ 2019-03-29 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Heiko Stuebner
  Cc: Tomasz Figa, Ziyuan Xu, Ezequiel Garcia, ryandcase, Elaine Zhang,
	mka, Douglas Anderson, Michael Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
	linux-kernel, linux-rockchip, linux-clk, linux-arm-kernel

It appears that there is a typo in the rk3288 TRM.  For
GRF_SOC_CON0[7] it says that 0 means "vepu" and 1 means "vdpu".  It's
the other way around.

How do I know?  Here's my evidence:

1. Prior to commit 4d3e84f99628 ("clk: rockchip: describe aclk_vcodec
   using the new muxgrf type on rk3288") we always pretended that we
   were using "aclk_vdpu" and the comment in the code said that this
   matched the default setting in the system.  In fact the default
   setting is 0 according to the TRM and according to reading memory
   at bootup.  In addition rk3288-based Chromebooks ran like this and
   the video codecs worked.
2. With the existing clock code if you boot up and try to enable the
   new VIDEO_ROCKCHIP_VPU as a module (and without "clk_ignore_unused"
   on the command line), you get errors like "failed to get ack on
   domain 'pd_video', val=0x80208".  After flipping vepu/vdpu things
   init OK.
3. If I export and add both the vepu and vdpu to the list of clocks
   for RK3288_PD_VIDEO I can get past the power domain errors, but now
   I freeze when the vpu_mmu gets initted.
4. If I just mark the "vdpu" as IGNORE_UNUSED then everything boots up
   and probes OK showing that somehow the "vdpu" was important to keep
   enabled.  This is because we were actually using it as a parent.
5. After this change I can hack "aclk_vcodec_pre" to parent from
   "aclk_vepu" using assigned-clocks and the video codec still probes
   OK.

Fixes: 4d3e84f99628 ("clk: rockchip: describe aclk_vcodec using the new muxgrf type on rk3288")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
---
I currently have no way to test the JPEG mem2mem driver, so hopefully
others can test this and make sure it's happy for them.  I'm just
happy not to get strange errors at boot anymore.

 drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
index 5a67b7869960..4d767f9c3a80 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ PNAME(mux_hsadcout_p)	= { "hsadc_src", "ext_hsadc" };
 PNAME(mux_edp_24m_p)	= { "ext_edp_24m", "xin24m" };
 PNAME(mux_tspout_p)	= { "cpll", "gpll", "npll", "xin27m" };
 
-PNAME(mux_aclk_vcodec_pre_p)	= { "aclk_vepu", "aclk_vdpu" };
+PNAME(mux_aclk_vcodec_pre_p)	= { "aclk_vdpu", "aclk_vepu" };
 PNAME(mux_usbphy480m_p)		= { "sclk_otgphy1_480m", "sclk_otgphy2_480m",
 				    "sclk_otgphy0_480m" };
 PNAME(mux_hsicphy480m_p)	= { "cpll", "gpll", "usbphy480m_src" };
-- 
2.21.0.392.gf8f6787159e-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread