Re: [PATCH v1 00/19] Introduce Nuvoton Arbel NPCM8XX BMC SoC

[Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>]

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 1:59 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 22, 2022 at 5:50 PM Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patchset  adds initial support for the Nuvoton
> > Arbel NPCM8XX Board Management controller (BMC) SoC family.
> >
> > The Nuvoton Arbel NPCM8XX SoC is a fourth-generation BMC.
> > The NPCM8XX computing subsystem comprises a quadcore ARM
> > Cortex A35 ARM-V8 architecture.
> >
> > This patchset adds minimal architecture and drivers such as:
> > Clocksource, Clock, Reset, and WD.
> >
> > Some of the Arbel NPCM8XX peripherals are based on Poleg NPCM7XX.
> >
> > This patchset was tested on the Arbel NPCM8XX evaluation board.
>
> Thanks for your submission. Please note a few things about the process here:
>
> - The merge window is currently open, which means a lo

Something wrong with the script?

> Some of the Arbel NPCM8XX peripherals are based on Poleg NPCM7XX.
>
> This patchset was tested on the Arbel NPCM8XX evaluation board.
>
> Tomer Maimon (19):
>   dt-bindings: timer: npcm: Add npcm845 compatible string
>   clocksource: timer-npcm7xx: Add NPCM845 timer support
>   dt-bindings: serial: 8250: Add npcm845 compatible string
>   tty: serial: 8250: Add NPCM845 UART support
>   dt-bindings: watchdog: npcm: Add npcm845 compatible string
>   watchdog: npcm_wdt: Add NPCM845 watchdog support
>   dt-binding: clk: npcm845: Add binding for Nuvoton NPCM8XX Clock
>   clk: npcm8xx: add clock controller
>   dt-bindings: reset: add syscon property
>   reset: npcm: using syscon instead of device data
>   dt-bindings: reset: npcm: Add support for NPCM8XX
>   reset: npcm: Add NPCM8XX support
>   dt-bindings: arm: npcm: Add maintainer
>   dt-bindings: arm: npcm: Add nuvoton,npcm845 compatible string
>   dt-bindings: arm: npcm: Add nuvoton,npcm845 GCR compatible string
>   arm64: npcm: Add support for Nuvoton NPCM8XX BMC SoC
>   arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add initial NPCM8XX device tree
>   arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add initial NPCM845 EVB device tree
>   arm64: defconfig: Add Nuvoton NPCM family supportt of maintainers
>   won't be reviewing your patches at the moment. It may be better to wait
>   for the -rc1 to be out before sending out v2
>
> - don't send your patches to soc@kernel.org unless you want me to pick
>   them up into the soc tree and they have been reviewed already. The series
>   is clearly still under review at the moment, and I expect it to go through
>   a few revisions first.
>
> - gmail marked your emails as possible spam for me. I don't know what
>   happened here, but you may want to look into this to ensure that
>   everybody receives it.
>
> Some of the Arbel NPCM8XX peripherals are based on Poleg NPCM7XX.
>
> This patchset was tested on the Arbel NPCM8XX evaluation board.
>
> Tomer Maimon (19):
>   dt-bindings: timer: npcm: Add npcm845 compatible string
>   clocksource: timer-npcm7xx: Add NPCM845 timer support
>   dt-bindings: serial: 8250: Add npcm845 compatible string
>   tty: serial: 8250: Add NPCM845 UART support
>   dt-bindings: watchdog: npcm: Add npcm845 compatible string
>   watchdog: npcm_wdt: Add NPCM845 watchdog support
>   dt-binding: clk: npcm845: Add binding for Nuvoton NPCM8XX Clock
>   clk: npcm8xx: add clock controller
>   dt-bindings: reset: add syscon property
>   reset: npcm: using syscon instead of device data
>   dt-bindings: reset: npcm: Add support for NPCM8XX
>   reset: npcm: Add NPCM8XX support
>   dt-bindings: arm: npcm: Add maintainer
>   dt-bindings: arm: npcm: Add nuvoton,npcm845 compatible string
>   dt-bindings: arm: npcm: Add nuvoton,npcm845 GCR compatible string
>   arm64: npcm: Add support for Nuvoton NPCM8XX BMC SoC
>   arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add initial NPCM8XX device tree
>   arm64: dts: nuvoton: Add initial NPCM845 EVB device tree
>   arm64: defconfig: Add Nuvoton NPCM family support
>
> - For an initial platform submission, I can merge the
>   clk/clocksource/serial/reset drivers along with the platform if they
>   have an Ack from the subsystem maintainers. I would normally
>   not include the watchdog patch in this as it's not essential, but
>   I suppose that it's fine if you only do a oneline change and it
>   has an Ack. If you have other nonessential drivers that need changes,
>   best submit them separately though.
>
>          Arnd



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko